Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katherine Harris Wins (Woo hoo!! Go Katherine!!)

Posted on 09/05/2006 7:14:23 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-598 next last
To: Lunatic Fringe
Yeah, that about sounds like the intellectual Feats of Strength a NASCAR fan would come up with.

And the bigotry comes out in an even juicier form! Thanks for handing me the win.

Either provide the Founders' writings I referred to, or go home.

561 posted on 09/06/2006 10:36:07 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (NewsMax gives aid and comfort to the enemy-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1642052/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

Where's your answer to 547?


562 posted on 09/06/2006 10:37:05 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (NewsMax gives aid and comfort to the enemy-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1642052/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
I direct my request in post 547 to you as well.

How about banning sales of Playboy magazine at your local 7/11 or attempting to force TV programs they dont like off the air (including pay cable) rather than just switching the channel? How about sticking their proverbial noses into the Schiavo case? How about preventing the exploration of embryonic stem cell research. Oh and how about forcing school systems in Kansas to teach that God created the world in a literal seven days and that evolution is a hoax and calling it science.

563 posted on 09/06/2006 10:40:11 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
"This is just another great example of Christians attempting to use government to enforce their dogma."

As opposed to secularists enforcing their's.

Someone's values are always being imposed. Of course the situation was much easier and less confusing when there was a value concensus, which today there isn't and thus is precisely the reason public education should be ended.

564 posted on 09/06/2006 10:42:37 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
The funny little Blue Laws comment is pretty funny, too. Oh, the horror!

How about us secular types pass a law that you cant ring church bells on Sunday mornings to avoid waking up those debaucherous folks who partied until six in the morning.

565 posted on 09/06/2006 10:44:45 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"You know, the "real, true" conservatives that FR seems to be flush with."

It's not the real true conservatives that hate her; it's the Bushbots who side w/the Bush brothers who tried to sabotage Harris at every turn. The real true conservatives support Katherine; the lemmings who follow their elitist Rockefeller Republican masters, don't.


566 posted on 09/06/2006 10:44:50 PM PDT by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
It amazes me that people are more concerned about the "harm"(/sarcasm) done to students by a few minutes of prayer uttered at the beginning of the school day, than drugs and sex in the schools.

Arent you the same folks that go ballistic when a local school district allows teachrs to discusses the five principles of Islam in social studies or world history?

567 posted on 09/06/2006 10:49:41 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Actually, Dave, I well remember learning about the prophet Mohammed and Islam in history class in Catholic gradeshool. I can still vividly recall the picture that went with the lesson, Mohammed on horseback, sword in hand leading men into battle.

Nope, no one I know got upset then and no one I know gets upset about it now.

That's quite a bigoted accusation I'd say.

568 posted on 09/06/2006 10:58:08 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
Nope, no one I know got upset then and no one I know gets upset about it now. That's quite a bigoted accusation I'd say

Then you've missed all the bigots on FR that have bitched about such teaching. Dont explain Islam which is constantly in the news but do teach "Intelligent Design".

569 posted on 09/06/2006 11:02:05 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

My understanding is that people get upset when the teaching of Islam is permitted to be taught but not christianity in some public shools.


570 posted on 09/06/2006 11:08:47 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: highball

Exactly!


571 posted on 09/07/2006 6:12:01 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

"Either provide the Founders' writings I referred to, or go home."

You want me to show that the Founders either wrote "We didn't mention God in the Constitution because we were afraid of fundies" or you get to declare that you "won"? Well, yes I cower in the shadow of your mental might. [/sarcasm]

If you can't see how ridiculous you sound, then I suggest you continue to watch cars drive in a circle for amusement. At least then you can delude yourself into the belief that you are an intellectual giant among your own kind.


572 posted on 09/07/2006 6:59:50 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Fundamental Christians like Katherine Harris are NOT conservatives.


573 posted on 09/07/2006 7:49:31 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic
She doesn't look nice.

She looks naughty!!!

In the very best way....

;>)

574 posted on 09/07/2006 10:01:09 AM PDT by Husker8877
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
You want me to show that the Founders either wrote "We didn't mention God in the Constitution because we were afraid of fundies" or you get to declare that you "won"? Well, yes I cower in the shadow of your mental might. [/sarcasm]

No, I'm asking you to back up your assertion. Show me where any of the Founders wrote that they decided (as you assert) to specifically leave mention of a Creator out of the Constitution. Show me where any of them wrote anything that betrayed a fear of Christian participation in government.

If you can't see how ridiculous you sound, then I suggest you continue to watch cars drive in a circle for amusement. At least then you can delude yourself into the belief that you are an intellectual giant among your own kind.

Actually, I'm more of a football kind of guy...but I appreciate you're continuing to show your own lack of intellectual prowess by substituting bigoted anti-NASCAR rants for facts.

575 posted on 09/07/2006 10:37:10 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Help honor those 2,996 people lost on 9/11-- www.dcroe.com/2996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Arent you the same folks that go ballistic when a local school district allows teachrs to discusses the five principles of Islam in social studies or world history?

First, I believe that (at best) you're thinking of the case in California, where students were required to practice components of Islam for a school unit. That's a long way from teaching what the five pillars are. These kids were required to fast and pray to Allah. Would it be OK with you if they were required to recite the Lord's Prayer and go to confession to learn about Christianty, or be made to stand before the class and declare their is no God before they can learn about the life of a prominent atheist? Here's one of many articles on what went down in Cali.

Second, can you provide a case where Christians or any other group have opposed a school district teaching a "just the facts" course on Islam, where history and practice (such as the pillars) are discussed? I'm not aware of any number of Christians opposing the teaching of these sorts of things and would be glad to oppose them.

576 posted on 09/07/2006 10:54:37 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Help honor those 2,996 people lost on 9/11-- www.dcroe.com/2996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Don't you love the effort on FR lately to redefine conservatism so that Christians are excluded from the definition? I wonder what Washington, Madison and Lincoln would think about that? Actually, scratch that, I don't wonder at all, I'm pretty sure they'd think it was coo-coo for cocoa puffs.


577 posted on 09/07/2006 10:56:52 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Help honor those 2,996 people lost on 9/11-- www.dcroe.com/2996)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Show me where any of the Founders wrote that they decided (as you assert) to specifically leave mention of a Creator out of the Constitution.

The fact that the Constituion does not mention God is evidence that the Framers decided to leave mention of a Creator out of the Constitution.

Now for my next trick, I'll will provide evidence that I did not have eggs for breakfast.

578 posted on 09/07/2006 11:45:22 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Don't you love the effort on FR lately to redefine conservatism so that Christians are excluded from the definition?

The efforts of fundamental Christians to expand the powers of government by imposing legislative morality flies in the face of limited-government conservatism. I would be less suspicious of Christians if their entire agenda wasn't about turning my government into a theocracy. Now if you could set aside your social agenda, I would welcome your support of smaller government. If not, then maybe you and the other Fundies should go form your own party and stop trying to hijack ours.

579 posted on 09/07/2006 11:49:35 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

BTW, Lincoln was not a conservative. He expanded and abused his authority, but he saved the Republic. He was a social liberal. He was a "Christian" but thoroughly rejected concepts like Hell and Original Sin and would probably be labeled a RINO by today's standards.


580 posted on 09/07/2006 11:52:13 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580581-598 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson