Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Growing number of CBS affiliates refusing to carry profanity laden program
American Family Association/Action Alert/Email | Donald E. Wildmon

Posted on 09/06/2006 10:46:23 AM PDT by Iam1ru1-2

Ask the FCC to enforce broadcast decency laws should CBS air profane language during prime-time viewing hours this Sunday evening

Earlier I wrote you about the plans by CBS to air "9/11" containing hardcore profanity during primetime viewing (Supreme Court's 'safe-harbour') hours when children are most likely to be watching television. The program is schedule to air this Sunday evening.

Because of your actions, CBS announced they would not seek sponsors for the program. But they also said, sponsors or no sponsors, that they will not mute the profanity.

A growing number of CBS affiliates have publicly stated that they would not carry the program. Other affiliates are expected to drop the show or air it late at night. Those that do carry it risk at fine of $325,000 for each indecent incident. Potential fines could run into the millions of dollars.

But CBS has responded by saying that the profanity is ok to broadcast to children because it will be shown "in context" of the program itself.

If the FCC allows this as an acceptable excuse to air the profanity, it leaves the door open for CBS to show anything and everything because anything, and everything, is always "in context."

For instance, suppose CBS decides they want to air a documentary concerning pornography. Using CBS's logic, the network could show actual hardcore pornographic scenes in an "after school special" saying the scenes are "in context" and necessary because they are an integral part of the documentary.

The phrase "in context" means that CBS could (and would) show anything because it is "in context." In the final analysis "in context" means nothing is exempt.

I urge you to email the FCC urging them to reject the "in context" argument. A copy will also go to CBS. And please forward this to your friends and family.

Take Action

Send the email to the FCC asking them to reject the "in context" argument.

Contact your local CBS affiliate" and ask them not to air "9/11." Tell them you are prepared to file a formal complaint with the FCC if they do.

Please inform your friends and family.

Click Here to Email the FCC Now!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: abuseof1stamendment; bdlnguge; cbs; churchlady; dancingbolivians; donaldwildmon; fcc; fifthanniversary; lostmymind; mrsgrundy; naughtywords; pansies; profanity; thoushaltmeddle; wtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-330 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2006 10:46:25 AM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

ever notice how they apply this law literally when something is of interest to conservatives, but never when it is of interests to liberals and perverts?


2 posted on 09/06/2006 10:48:25 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

What the heck is this?


3 posted on 09/06/2006 10:49:14 AM PDT by Scourge of God (Remember, liberals, 'baaa' means NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
I see nothing wrong with beeping out f-ing this (as in this ain't f-ing disneyland).
4 posted on 09/06/2006 10:49:26 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

"I urge you to email the FCC urging them to reject the "in context" argument."

-I reject this post, no matter what the context.


5 posted on 09/06/2006 10:50:14 AM PDT by theanonymouslurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

That documentary is reality - deal with it.

And if you don't like it, don't watch it. But please, we don't need you playing nanny for the rest of us.


6 posted on 09/06/2006 10:50:58 AM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Donald Wildmond is a tireless worker of keeping our airwaves clean.
7 posted on 09/06/2006 10:50:59 AM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle

What in the heck are you talking about?


8 posted on 09/06/2006 10:51:25 AM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2; All

I usually like AFA, but they can go pound sand.

This is a documentary.

It should not be censored.

AFA is on the side of terrorists apparently.


9 posted on 09/06/2006 10:52:17 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Have you seen this program?

I have; it has NOTHING to do with the profanity; it's what really happened.

This "campaign" is a prime example of "pick your battles."


10 posted on 09/06/2006 10:52:47 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Nonsense. Every profanity costs the network $300,000. They're not about to sprinkle dirty words around at those rates.


11 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:04 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Agreed.


12 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:15 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Don't really care about the profanity, the subject is the firey murder of 3000 innocent people by Islamic terrorists for crying out loud.

What I want to know is does this program portray a true reflection of the horrific attack, or is it more apologist, terrorist-glorifying, morally ambiguous propaganda from our Hollywood leftists?


13 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:27 AM PDT by wvobiwan (BOYCOTT NYT, LAT, AP, Reuters, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, BBC, WaPo, Haaretz, and ALL leftist rags!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
American Family Association

I bet they are demonrats, looking to abort the truth.

14 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:47 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
I urge you to email the FCC...And please forward this to your friends and family.

Wouldn't it make more sense if I simply exercised my prerogative as a parent and simply informed my children that they were not allowed to watch the program?

Or, better yet, not having a head filled with oatmeal mush, I bet I can find the on-off switch by myself.

I care less what the networks do.

I will monitor what my children do and the networks will either respond to the lack of viewers by stopping the broadcast of the questionable content or they won't, at which point they will lose sponsors and viewers and eventually will go away, anyway.

I don't need the state to be a nanny and this type of solicitation of protest is exactly that.

I will decide what my children watch or do not watch.

15 posted on 09/06/2006 10:53:53 AM PDT by OldSmaj (I am a sworn enemy of islam and all things muslim. And that's the end of the discussion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Is this the documentary done by the Frenchmen?

If so, this is a must-see, profanity or no.

I suspect it's mostly the liberal crowd who don't want this shown, just as they like to keep all reminders of 9-11 away from the public. Taking advantage of some gullible conservatives, I suppose.

16 posted on 09/06/2006 10:54:35 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Do they use actual content, or is this some low life CBS sponsored dog and pony show. How much you want to bet that NO profanity towards the Islamofascist will be presented.


17 posted on 09/06/2006 10:56:37 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

LOL. Censoring the f-word and the s-word now means that one is on the side of the terrorists.

Hyperbole, anyone?

For the record, don't bleep the words out, it's a documentary and the use of the words reflects the harsh reality we faced that day.


18 posted on 09/06/2006 10:56:47 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Donald Wildmond is a total ass. He would rather fret about some silly words and thus blunt the impact of the reality of that day than push to have MORE people watch this.

Go mind your own f-ing business, jerk--don't like it? DON'T WATCH IT!

19 posted on 09/06/2006 10:57:03 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Well ****!


20 posted on 09/06/2006 10:57:03 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-330 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson