Skip to comments.Meet the No Planers. They believe there weren't any planes on 9/11, just missiles
Posted on 09/11/2006 7:10:10 AM PDT by aculeusEdited on 09/12/2006 3:52:54 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
They believe there weren't any planes on 9/11, just missiles wrapped in holograms - and there weren't any London terrorists on 7/7 either. The new-wave conspiracy theorists aren't green-ink types: they're educated; they have secret service connections; they live in Highgate.
At first sight, David Shayler and Annie Machon's home in Highgate - the leafiest of London's leafy suburbs - looks like a picture of middle-class respectability. There are Japanese landscape paintings on the living-room walls. Shelves groan under the weight of hardback novels and books on politics. An Alsatian with a well-kept, glossy coat looks on curiously as Belinda McKenzie - the grandmotherly landlady of the house - serves tea in china cups with a plate of delicious shortbread biscuits. "Enjoy," she says in a soft, plummy English accent.
Then you notice the curiosities. On the table sits a document about the "controlled demolition" of the twin towers. The shelves hold books titled The 9/11 Commission Report: omissions and distortions and The New Pearl Harbor: disturbing questions about the Bush administration and 9/11. There's a stack of colourful leaflets advertising a club night called Truth 9/11, to take place in Brixton in a week's time, the "11" in "9/11" represented by two tall stereo speakers. DVDs litter a work desk. One is called 7/7: mind the gap. The cover of another, titled Loose Change, asks: "What if 9/11 were an inside job rather than the work of al-Qaeda...?"
This cluttered house in the heart of respectable, latte-drinking Highgate doubles as the hub of the British and Irish 9/11 Truth Campaign. It's a loose group, founded in January 2004, which suspects precisely that 9/11 was an "inside job", organised and executed by a "shadowy elite" made up of individuals from the FBI, the CIA, the arms industry and politics. Shayler and Machon - the boyfriend-and-girlfriend former spies who famously left MI5 in 1996 after becoming disgruntled - are its leading lights. They've gone from being the Posh and Becks of the whistle-blowing world to something very like the Richard and Judy of the 9/11 conspiracy-theory set.
Sitting on the comfy couch, their cups of tea in hand, they try to convince me that the 11 September 2001 attacks were executed by elements in the west who wanted to launch wars and "make billions upon trillions of dollars".
"We know for certain that the official story of 9/11 isn't true," says Shayler. "The twin towers did not collapse because of planes and fire; they were brought down in a controlled demolition. The Pentagon was most likely hit by an American missile, not an aeroplane." Machon nods. In black trousers and black top, this sophisticated blonde in her late thirties comes across more like a schoolmarm than a 9/11 anorak. "The Pentagon's anti-missile defence system would definitely have picked up and dealt with a commercial airliner. We can only assume that whatever hit the Pentagon was sending a friendly signal. A missile fired by a US military plane would have sent a friendly signal." She says this in a kind of Anna Ford-style newsreader's voice, as if she were speaking the truth and nothing but the truth. She takes another sip of tea.
Say the phrase "conspiracy theorist" (but don't say it to Shayler and Machon if you can help it, because they angrily deny being conspiracy theorists) and most people will think of those nutty militiamen in redneck areas of America who hate Big Government, or of taxi drivers with possibly anti-Semitic leanings in some hot, dusty backwater of the Middle East who revel in telling western clients in particular: "America and the Jew did 9/11." Yet, here in Highgate, I am talking to a man and woman who have worked in the British secret services and who, together with their landlady Belinda, a professional linguist, truly believe that American elements facilitated 9/11 in order to "justify their adventurism in oil-rich countries in the Middle East", in Shayler's words. Here we have a new kind of conspiracy theorist: the chattering conspiracist, respectable, well-read, articulate, but, I regret to report, no less cranky than those rednecks and misguided Kabul cabbies.
The 9/11 Truth Campaign tries to distance itself from the green-ink loons who have been spreading rumours about 9/11 ever since the first plane slammed into the World Trade Center. "In London we meet socially on the first Monday of every month, and for a discussion on the third Monday of every month," says the ever-chirpy Machon, as if describing a Women's Institute get-together to discuss knitting, rather than a meeting of individuals who think a dark cabal of nutters controls the world. Its activists - many of whom are fairly well-to-do, and who include lecturers, film-makers and other whistle-blowers - pore over footage and photos of the events of 9/11, furiously debate them online, and argue that, scientifically, the official version of events doesn't add up. For Belinda - who describes herself as the "tea-maker and dishwasher of the movement" and allows activists from outside London to stay at her home - this is about "getting to the historical truth of what happened".
Yet, for all their forensic pretensions, their views remain crankily conspiratorial and unfounded. Take the claim that a plane did not hit the Pentagon, which has been doing the rounds since the French journalist Thierry Meyssan published 9/11: the big lie in 2002. "Just look at the news footage," says Shayler. "You won't see any plane debris on the Pentagon lawn."
Truth-seekers on a mission
True, but there was plenty of plane debris inside the Pentagon, where Flight 77 entered and exploded. There are numerous photographs of the blackened belly of the Pentagon crash site, taken by officials of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and other rescue workers, which clearly show airliner wheel hubs, landing gear, part of a nose cone and bits of fuselage in the smouldering rubble (I hate to have to do this, but if you don't believe me take a look here: [http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm]). What kind of warrior for historical truth doesn't pay attention to basic photographic evidence?
Or consider the claim that the twin towers were brought down in a controlled demolition (which would have involved sinister individuals planting tonnes of dynamite in the weeks prior to 9/11 without being spotted by any of the good citizens of New York). The US National Institute of Standards and Technology investigated the cause of the collapse - during which "some 200 technical experts reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs [and] analysed 236 pieces of steel" - and it found "no corroborating evidence" that the towers had been toppled by dynamite. There is a lot of scientific evidence there, yet it is ignored or discounted by the apparently scientifically minded truth-seekers of this campaign.
At times, the line between these middle-class campaigners' apparently "scientific investigations" and old-fashioned conspiracy-mongering seems uncomfortably thin. One of their leaflets has a web address for David Icke, the former sports presenter-turned-"Son of God" who thinks the world is run by a race of reptilian humanoids. Shayler says: "There is a Zionist conspiracy; that's a fact. And they were behind 9/11." Machon intervenes diplomatically: "Not everyone in the campaign shares that view."
Then things really go off the rails. I ask Shayler if it's true he has become a "no planer" - that is, someone who believes that no planes at all were involved in the 9/11 atrocity. Machon looks uncomfortable. "Oh, f*** it, I'm just going to say this," he tells her. "Yes, I believe no planes were involved in 9/11." But we all saw with our own eyes the two planes crash into the WTC. "The only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes," he says. "Watch the footage frame by frame and you will see a cigar-shaped missile hitting the World Trade Center." He must notice that my jaw has dropped. "I know it sounds weird, but this is what I believe."
The 7/7 photo "forgery"
What about 7/7? Some in the 9/11 Truth Campaign aren't "really into 7/7", in Belinda's words. But Shayler is. He recently finished making 7/7: mind the gap, a film in which he suggests that, given the late running of trains on that fateful day last year, the four bombers could not have blown themselves up in London at the times claimed. He also believes that the closed-circuit TV image of the four men entering Luton Station is a "Photoshop job - a forgery, and a bad one at that". He goes so far as to argue that those who forged the photo did it badly in order to send a signal to the rest of us. "This could be elements in the New World Order saying, 'Look, we're sick of lying. We've had enough.'"
So have I. The thought of behind-the-scenes suits being cajoled by their evil paymasters to create an image of four rucksack-wearing terrorists in order to cover up their own bombing of London is just too ludicrous. These 9/11 truth campaigners merely add a supposedly scientific gloss to already existing conspiracy theories, trying to make the ridiculous seem respectable. In the process, they actually do a disservice to "historical truth". History gets reduced to a mysterious force beyond our control, and politics - real politics - is imagined to be the preserve of unknown, faceless puppet-masters whom we can never hope to influence. And the rest of us are reduced to the status of helpless spectators, searching amid the rubble of 9/11 and the aftermath of 7/7 for signs of truth and meaning.
Read more of my articles for the New Statesman here.
Meet the loons.
As Charlie Sheen has said...
Anyone who believes this theory is delusional. Coming in this morning, the radio was playing clips from 9/11/01. There were several calls from folks who were near the Pentagon made to the radio station within minutes after the attack. Everyone single one described a plane going in to the building. That cannot be faked. Just that example disproves the theory.
Funny how these conspiracy theorists never explain what happened to the passengers of the planes if it in fact were missiles...
Yesterday there was some wingnut professor of something from somewhere on Fox News, asserting that there were no airplanes anywhere, and that the video images we saw were some kind of hologram or something.
No one landed on the moon. Pass it on.
More like "No Brainers."
There. I fixed the headline.
Yep. Same LooneyTuners claimed the
"US Landing on the Moon" was actually
filmed on a Hollywood back lot.
Why do we bother even giving this
kind of Idiot media space?
The REAL insult is having them receive
professors'salaries at some of our Colleges!
Talk about 'Stuck on Stupid', geeze!!!
Unbelievable. Where do they find people like this? Spending too much time on the holodeck set of STTNG. I'll tell you, just when you think there can't be any more loony idiots in the world, people like these come along.
So, they were missles shaped like 737s? Right.
Ahh, the technological superiority of troglodyte Afghani terrorists.
Just 8 months in office and Bush planned and pulled this off. Wow, he's brilliant!
My mother saw the first plane hit the first tower. She's not part of any conspiracy.
What disgusts me is the news media reports on these lunatic's theories like they might be legitimate instead of treating them like the lunatics they are. Why don't the major networks and the major newspapers write articles with the true facts and show that these people are wrong? Isn't that an IMPORTANT story? Aren't those important FACTS to let the people know?
We have no legitimate news media. They no longer are in the business to inform the public of the facts. They are only another entertainment source that tells stories.
The reason for my tagline..
the biggest problem these idiots have is that the second plane was filmed going in from so many different cameras at so many different distances..that's alot of holograms to create for alot of different cameras.
The problem isn't that crazy people believe things like this. The problem is that the MSM gives them even the slightest amount of airtime - because when they do, even when they portray the loons as the butt of a joke, it encourages other loons who take such television appearances as "proof" of the conspiracy's existence.
Forty years ago, no matter how much the MSM might have hated the President, they knew what boundaries should never be crossed.
The conspriatorial wingnuts say the planes and people that took off from Boston were taken to Area 51 in NV - the planes you saw crash into the WTC were remotely piloted and nobody was on board. Listen for yourself to Errhead Amerika, the land of fruits, nuts and crazies! Their expert was on Mike Malloy right before he got fired. They believe the Federal Government perpetrated this hoax so they could launch a war into Iraq (gimme a break - thought we targeted Afghanistan??) Webster Tarpley, author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA.
Respectable, well heeled loons are still a few bricks short at the end of the day.
The stupidest president and the most incompetent administration in history pulled off this amazingly complex plot flawlessly. Wow! Imagine what they could do if they actually had brains!
He must have started working on it when he was governor of Texas.
Brendan O'Neill can forget about being invited back here.
Tin foil available here. I bet they would pay $1,000,000 per roll. Idiots.
This is insanity. I just returned from a week-long counter-terrorism training course which was attended by at least 8 first-responders from NYC. They are aghast at the fools outside the area that believe this nonsense.
There's no cure for willful blindness.
Sponsored by Reynold's brand tinfoil hats.One only needs two tools in life: WD-40 to make things go, and duct tape to make them stop.
Would it be fraud to type up "corroborating" documents and sell them to these fools for vast amounts of money, using the "fake but accurate" defence, and "a fool and his money are soon parted" rationale? You know, sort of like an original Hitler diary, written on Barbie stationary?
Hating Jews makes you crazy.
If someone thinks that a huge plane thousands saw and heard go into a building was an optical illusion, then a few hundred people here and there are easy to explain away.
These people are living examples of something we see to a lesser extent on DU. They first make up their minds according to their Bush hatred, and then seek the facts to fit.
Probably being named Webster Tarpley has unhinged his brain.
...shaking my head....asking the Heavenly Father to forgive them....for they do not know......what they believe.....
They must get along real good with the "Flat Earthers."
They violated their low-level security clearances by publishing material which they hoped would be politically sensitive enough to bring down the Tory government.
Nothing they published made a ripple in the press.
They were fired, prosecuted and Shayler spent 6 months in jail.
They are legends in their own minds - Jonathan Pollard was far savvier than they, and he is obviously a complete joker.
"The Mind Gap" seems pretty wide.....o.O
Besides, I got your missile wrapped in a hologram right here, baby..
Tell us more.
That's some "hologram".
Idiots. How can people be so damn stupid with the overwhelming amount of evidence right in their face?
I suppose those planes hitting the twin towers were just a figment of our imagination.
Now that is true; I looked out that night and the moon wasn't even out.
Funny how these conspiracy theorists never explain what happened to the passengers of the planes if it in fact were missiles...
They're either at Roswell or in one of the secret CIA prisons...still investigating and will advise.
I think I know why this pair left MI5.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.