Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Adder
"So you are saying that the generator I am using to keep my home going is fair game for the state/city to take and let my neighbor use because he doesn't have one? And because I am "compensated", its ok?"

Don't get your panties in a wad. The purpose of the law is to permit government agencies to use resources available--such as that generator in the hardware store, whose owner has evacuated and can't be reached for permission. This happened repeatedly in Gulfport and Biloxi--needed resources in intact retail establishments couldn't be legally used because the owners "just weren't there"--so the cops, firefighters, and other emergency workers broke in an used them anyway.

It wouldn't apply to your personal generator used to power your refrigerators.

Now, the part about confiscating personal firearms IS illegal (proven by court cases in New Orleans).

31 posted on 09/12/2006 4:50:44 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

""--so the cops, firefighters, and other emergency workers broke in an used them anyway."

Does the Cooper City law limit the seizure of property to closed retail establishments?

Your "don't worry" attitude would be right at home in the Cooper City council.


33 posted on 09/12/2006 5:07:42 AM PDT by gas0linealley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog

"The purpose of the law is to permit government agencies to use resources available--such as that generator in the hardware store, whose owner has evacuated and can't be reached for permission. This happened repeatedly in Gulfport and Biloxi--needed resources in intact retail establishments couldn't be legally used because the owners "just weren't there"--so the cops, firefighters, and other emergency workers broke in an used them anyway."

Yeah...I can recognize the intent and it all sounds so reasonable and cuddly.
Not having read the actual ordinance in question, I should simply defer to all that reasonableness.
Unless it actually prohibits taking personal generators as I described or even one's home for some perceived good/better use is problematical.

Along with any potential gun seizures. Take the guns, taking the property becomes a lot easier.


38 posted on 09/12/2006 5:27:49 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog
"Now, the part about confiscating personal firearms IS illegal (proven by court cases in New Orleans)."

Help me here. Which cases are you citing?

47 posted on 09/12/2006 6:20:53 AM PDT by OldEagle (May you live long enough to hear the legends of your own adventures.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog

I wouldn't think there would be a problem regarding the government paid the owner to repair any damage caused by the government breaking in and the price for the equipment taken. Of course the government would then have to be responsible to secure the building as well against anyone taking advantage of it's forced entry.


144 posted on 09/12/2006 6:29:07 PM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog

Just cause it's illegal, doesn't mean that it couldn't or wouldn't happen. It happened in New Orleans. It could happen here in Texas too. Only difference is, here in Texas, somebody on the side of the 'firearm confiscators/takers' would get shot.

___
Now, the part about confiscating personal firearms IS illegal (proven by court cases in New Orleans).


150 posted on 09/12/2006 9:35:35 PM PDT by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson