Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(OBIT) Defendant in landmark sodomy ruling was not motivated by politics (Lawrence v. Texas case)
Houston Chronicle ^ | Sept. 14, 2006, 12:05AM | By ZEKE MINAYA

Posted on 09/14/2006 8:53:47 AM PDT by weegee

1967 TYRONE GARNER 2006

Defendant in landmark sodomy ruling was not motivated by politics

The key civil liberties victory for gays was 'fight against all odds'

Tyrone Garner, whose arrest in violation of Texas sodomy laws led to a challenge before the Supreme Court and an eventual victory that struck down such statutes across the country, died after a lengthy illness, friends said Wednesday. He was 39.

Garner, who died Monday of meningitis in a Houston-area hospital, was openly gay but not politically active when he chose to fight his arrest in court, said his lawyer, Mitchell Katine.

"He was very shy and did not like to speak publicly," Katine said. "But privately he was very happy to be part of the civil rights fight for gay and lesbian people."

One of the greatest civil liberties victories for gay Americans began with a petty grudge.

On Sept. 17, 1998, Garner was in the home of John Lawrence in defiance of the wishes of his partner at the time, Robert Eubanks. Eubanks called the Harris County Sheriff's Office and told authorities that a crazed gunman was in the house.

"I think he was jealous," Garner said of Eubanks in a 2004 interview with the Houston Chronicle.

Two deputies arrived and found the door unlocked and Garner and Lawrence having sex. The pair was arrested and charged with "homosexual conduct," a misdemeanor that made it a crime for same-gender couples in Texas to have sex, even in private. They spent several hours in jail before posting $200 bond.

Lawrence and Garner were approached by Katine and the New York-based Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. Lawrence wanted to challenge the arrest, but Garner was initially reluctant.

"I didn't think we'd win," Garner told the Chronicle. "I didn't enjoy being outed with my mugshot on TV. It was degrading to me."

They pleaded no contest in criminal court and took their case to the state appellate level, where they lost. In 2002 their case landed before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"He decided to fight against all odds," Katine said of Garner. "We lost at every level in Texas, and the only place we won was the Supreme Court."

The court ruled 6-3 in favor of Lawrence and Garner, deciding that the Texas law violated the Constitution's privacy guarantee. The decision also struck down the remaining similar laws that were still on the books in 13 states.

In the opinion for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote:

"The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government."

Paul Scott, the executive director of Equality Texas, a gay rights advocacy group based in Austin, said that Garner's victory set the stage for the battle over same-sex marriage.

"I think sometime people don't realize how great a victory it was," Scott said. "In many states sodomy laws were used to deny people custody of their children, it affected employment and sometimes was used to prevent people from seeking legal redress because they were considered criminals."

Scott said that a great debt was owed to Garner.

"Anyone having to be the public face of this issue would have had to go through some hard times," Scott said. "It took a lot of courage to fight."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: abunchofbaloney; activistcourt; chuckrosenthal; culturewar; homosexualagenda; houston; judicialtyranny; lawrencevtexas; medialies; mediarationalizing; roberteubanks; sodomy; texas; totalbs; tyronegarner; yeahright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: LexBaird

Thanks, I prefer it when it's not necessary. ;-)


41 posted on 09/14/2006 11:31:17 AM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob

Kozak points out that he suffered with meningitis for six months, so it wasn't bacterial meningitis but possibly viral meningitis caused by the HIV virus, so he may actually have caught meningitis by this route in a circuitous fashion, making me doubly wrong!


42 posted on 09/14/2006 11:36:59 AM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

TB and fungal meningitis are also high on the list of things people get as secondary infections from AIDS.


43 posted on 09/14/2006 11:44:12 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
I have to give you credit. It takes a stand-up person to make amends for being testy. Best Regards.
44 posted on 09/14/2006 11:45:58 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob

No problem and thank you.


45 posted on 09/14/2006 11:48:58 AM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

From the web, Medical Microbiology:

"Retroviruses

Human immunodeficiency virus can cause acute and progressive CNS disease. HTLV-I causes chronic spastic paraparesis in a small number of infected persons."

One of many possibilities along with other STDs or simple bacterial infection.


46 posted on 09/14/2006 11:57:51 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

I would think TB would be the least likely just because TB is not very common in the US. From my reading HIV meningitis is very common in people who are HIV positive and often kind of comes and goes multiple times. Cryptococcal meningitis is common and often fatal. My guess is that would be the most likely, what do you think?


47 posted on 09/14/2006 12:00:54 PM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Baacterial menigitis is rather quick if not treated immediately; retroviruses can linger on.


48 posted on 09/14/2006 12:03:43 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

AND - they had tried to get cops to come before and witness their sodomy just to get a case going. This was not their first attempt.

The article is a lie.


49 posted on 09/14/2006 12:19:02 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

I wonder about the writer of this article...

(I'd do some research but we're super busy right now...)


50 posted on 09/14/2006 12:20:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
I want to apologize.

Classy (no sarcasm,) as befits a real FReeper.

51 posted on 09/14/2006 12:27:46 PM PDT by JRios1968 (9-11, 5 years later...NEVER forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

I must have never heard of the latter since every case of meningitis I have heard of the deaths are within days or even less.


52 posted on 09/14/2006 12:33:42 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government."

Where in the Constitution does it say that the State cannot control a person's destiny?

53 posted on 09/14/2006 12:35:24 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative4Life

Hmm.. lengthy illness = the AIDS?


54 posted on 09/14/2006 12:58:39 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

RIP.


55 posted on 09/14/2006 3:36:20 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Men In Gitis.


56 posted on 09/14/2006 3:37:28 PM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson