Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WmShirerAdmirer

Electronic voting machines should just be electronic card punchers.

Input your vote, the machine punches your card, you verify it, and feed it into a machine built by a second manufacturer, which electronically counts and securely stores the card in tamperproof cases.


14 posted on 09/14/2006 2:05:02 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coconutt2000

sorry, coconutt2000, your idea makes too much sense

it will NEVER pass bureaucratic scrutiny


by the way, your tag-line is great:

(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))


32 posted on 09/14/2006 2:54:44 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: coconutt2000

Good system design. The other problem with these machines is that they need to be very cheap, because nobody wants to stand in line behind a single voting machine, and you can't afford a lot of security bells and whistles when each polling station needs 20-30 of them and has a limited budget. By contast, polling places with paper ballots have many stations (basically a chair and a privacy screen) where ballots are filled out, but one ballot box where they are stored. In your analogy, you'd have lots of cheap "electronic" card punchers and then one or two more expensive (and hence better built) electronic ballot boxes to count/store them.


33 posted on 09/14/2006 3:02:13 PM PDT by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson