Skip to comments.
US federal judge declares boating illegal in all US navigable waters
International Boat Industry ^
| 091406
| IBI Magazine
Posted on 09/15/2006 8:09:05 AM PDT by AdAstraPerArdua
In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried, Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi River and other navigable waters in the US.
In the case of Normal Parm v. Sheriff Mark Shumate, James ruled that federal law grants exclusive and private control over the waters of the river, outside the main shipping channel, to riparian landowners. The shallows of the navigable waters are no longer open to the public. That, in effect, makes boating illegal across most of the country.
"Even though this action seems like a horrible pre-April fools joke, it is very serious," said Phil Keeter, MRAA president, in a statement. "Because essentially all the waters and waterways of our country are considered navigable in the US law, this ruling declares recreational boating, water skiing, fishing, waterfowl hunting, and fishing tournaments to be illegal and the public subject to jail sentences for recreating with their families."
Last month, James rejected the findings of the Magistrate judge who found earlier that the American public had the right under federal law and Louisiana law to navigate, boat, fish, and hunt on the waters of the Mississippi river up to the normal high water line of the river. Judge James Kirk relied on the long established federal principles of navigation that recognized the public navigational rights "
entitles the public to the reasonable use of navigable waters for all legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating, sailing for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire, and in any kind of watercraft the use of which is consistent with others also enjoying the right possessed in common."
"MRAA is working with the Coast Guard, state boating law administrators, and NMMA to fight this onerous ruling," said Glen Mazzella, MRAA chairman, in the statement.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: blackrobedthugs; blackrobedtyrant; blackrobedtyrants; donutwatch; fiat; govwatch; jackbootedthug; jbt; judgislators; judicialactivism; libertarians; notfromtheonion; propertyrights; rfe; scotus; stenchfromthebench; stringhimup; totalitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-353 next last
To: AdAstraPerArdua
I was going to buy a new boat, but I'm not sure now! :(
To: AdAstraPerArdua
The nightmare continues......
3
posted on
09/15/2006 8:11:19 AM PDT
by
Fighting Irish
(Béagán agus a rá go maith)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
A Carter or a Clintoon judge?
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Somehow I doubt I'll face arrest for taking my boat out on the lake.
5
posted on
09/15/2006 8:11:31 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
The Clintons,Kerrys and Cronkites are OUTRAGED! No more yachting off of Martha's Vineyard?
6
posted on
09/15/2006 8:11:50 AM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
To: AdAstraPerArdua; xzins; blue-duncan; jude24
Ok Judge, you've made your ruling. Now try to enforce it.
7
posted on
09/15/2006 8:11:59 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
I won't write here what should happen to judges like this, but I can think it.
The judiciary in this nation is going nuts.
8
posted on
09/15/2006 8:12:30 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
Ping for later......this is unbelievable.
To: P-Marlowe
The problem is, those whose responsibility it is to enforce the laws on the books, are required to enforce this ruling. This places law enforcement agencies in an untenable situation.
10
posted on
09/15/2006 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Think of all the gas it will save.
11
posted on
09/15/2006 8:14:39 AM PDT
by
Racer1
To: AdAstraPerArdua; xzins; blue-duncan; jude24
James, Robert Gillespie
- Born 1946 in Ruston, LA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Nominated by William J. Clinton on January 27, 1998, to a seat vacated by John M. Shaw; Confirmed by the Senate on July 31, 1998, and received commission on August 3, 1998.
Education:
Louisiana Tech University, B.A., 1968
Louisiana State University Law School, J.D., 1971
Professional Career:
Private practice, Ruston, Louisiana, 1971-1998
Business law instructor, Louisiana Tech University, 1992-1998
Judge, Ruston City Court, Louisiana, 1985-1998
Race or Ethnicity: White
Gender: Male
12
posted on
09/15/2006 8:15:12 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
FYI:

Judge James Robertson
Judge Robertson was appointed United States District Judge in
December 1994. He graduated from Princeton University in 1959
and received an LL.B. from George Washington University Law School
in 1965 after serving in the U.S. Navy.
13
posted on
09/15/2006 8:15:24 AM PDT
by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
To: Prince Charles
>>A Carter or a Clintoon judge?
"In 1998, the vacancy created by the assumption of senior status of Judge Shaw was filled by Robert G. James. Judge James serves as a district judge in the Monroe Division at this time."
That would be the 'Toon.
From here:
http://www.lawd.uscourts.gov/USDC/WDLAHIST-06.html
14
posted on
09/15/2006 8:15:25 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
I think I just heard Huckleberry Finn laugh out loud.
15
posted on
09/15/2006 8:15:37 AM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried, Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi River and other navigable waters in the US. Who's going to enfore this again?
16
posted on
09/15/2006 8:16:20 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Property tax is feudalism. Income taxes are armed robbery of the minority by the majority.)
To: DoughtyOne; xzins; blue-duncan
The problem is, those whose responsibility it is to enforce the laws on the books, are required to enforce this ruling. This places law enforcement agencies in an untenable situation.No they are not. We don't enforce immigration laws.
17
posted on
09/15/2006 8:16:31 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: Prince Charles
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Sometimes I feel like I'm living in an alternative universe. This is insane.
19
posted on
09/15/2006 8:17:10 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(You've been zotted, sucka.)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
20
posted on
09/15/2006 8:18:06 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: P-Marlowe
I didn't know 'White' was a race or an ethnicity! I thought it was a color!
Surely you can be of many different races and ethnicities and still be white?
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Buy and boat and several guns.
22
posted on
09/15/2006 8:18:19 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
To: Robe
You've got the wrong judge.
23
posted on
09/15/2006 8:18:23 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western Division of Louisiana
I question that he has the authority to make such a ruling and I challenge him to find enough law enforcement officers who will enforce it.
However, the next time Lousyana floods, I hope he won't be relying on anyone with a boat to rescue his dumb butt - don't wanna break his law, doncha know.
Maybe Nagin will send him a school bus . . . . . . .
24
posted on
09/15/2006 8:18:56 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
I got a couple of bags of feathers. Anyone out there got any tar?
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
25
posted on
09/15/2006 8:19:16 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: P-Marlowe
LMAO...
Yes, that is true, but the powers that be haven't called them on the carpet for it. If this judge decides to do so, he can make things very difficult for agencies that don't abide by this ruling.
26
posted on
09/15/2006 8:19:19 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: FreedomPoster
Yes, he's been bought and paid for from the first:
"... Judge James Robertson, who dismissed tax evasion charges against Webster Hubbell, is the same judge who recently threw out several charges against two Tyson Food officials indicted by independent counsel Don Smaltz. The pair were convicted on the remaining charges after a two-hour jury deliberation."
To: DoughtyOne
Another idiot judeg, what the heck was he thinking????
28
posted on
09/15/2006 8:20:24 AM PDT
by
groovejedi
((Bolton For Prez!!))
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Judge James Kirk....
I swear you can't make this crap up.
29
posted on
09/15/2006 8:20:41 AM PDT
by
JamesP81
(The answer always lies with more freedom; not less)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Is it still ok to drive on the roads? Whenever you hear of this kind of lunacy you will find a liberal at the center of the absurdity.
30
posted on
09/15/2006 8:21:20 AM PDT
by
Edgerunner
(The greatest impediment to world peace is the UN and the Peaceniks)
To: bmwcyle
Another tidbit about this Bush hater:
"A US federal judge has resigned from the court that oversees government surveillance in intelligence cases in protest at President George W. Bush's secret authorization of a domestic spying program, according to a Washington Post story. US District Judge James Robertson, a member of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, sent a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts late last Monday notifying him of his resignation without providing an explanation, the report said."
To: cripplecreek
Somehow I doubt I'll face arrest for taking my boat out on the lake.That would depend on which lake you are talking about. Certainly the Great Lakes are navigable, as are other large lakes around the country.
33
posted on
09/15/2006 8:22:34 AM PDT
by
basil
(Exercise your Second Amendment Rights--buy another gun today.)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Traditionally, a landowners rights extended to either the mean high water or mean low water mark, and that varied from state to state.
Does this mean that ocean beachfront property owners rights include all the beach in front of their homes that are not already public property. In fact, does this mean that they own out to the 3, 12 or 200 mile limit?
Does this mean that I own the airspace above my home and that to fly in any airspace off a federal airway, the pilot flying over my house must have my permission?
34
posted on
09/15/2006 8:22:52 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Geeze, what a stupid ruling.
35
posted on
09/15/2006 8:22:54 AM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Has this story been reported anywhere else but this source. This decision is loony even by liberal standards.
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Welcome, boating friends, to the world we in general avaition have been living for the past 40 years.
http://www.aopa.org
To: groovejedi
He's probably a diciple of the River Navigators program, set up by the dufus from Hope.
38
posted on
09/15/2006 8:23:43 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: JamesP81
But is it James "T" Kirk.
39
posted on
09/15/2006 8:23:45 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Freedom of religion means freedom to practice Islam®)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Well, at least AIR is still free...............for a while, anyway........
40
posted on
09/15/2006 8:24:21 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Is Castro dead yet?........)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
?
So, who annointed (er, appointed) THIS idiot?
41
posted on
09/15/2006 8:24:29 AM PDT
by
Robert A. Cook, PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Edgerunner
Whenever you hear of this kind of lunacy you will find a liberal at the center of the absurdity. But of course. Deconstructionist Theory requires it.
42
posted on
09/15/2006 8:24:30 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Freedom of religion means freedom to practice Islam®)
To: DoughtyOne
If this judge decides to do so, he can make things very difficult for agencies that don't abide by this ruling.Judges have no power to enforce the law. Only the executive branch has that power. All the judge can do is bluster. This is a stupid decision. He is a stupid judge. He's a Clintoon appointee. What else needs to be said.
Now if we can just show all the boat owners in the world what will happen to them if they vote democratic, the republicans may hold 400 seats in the house in January.
43
posted on
09/15/2006 8:25:25 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
To: reagan_fanatic
To quote Bob Grant.. "It's sick out there and getting sicker!"
To: abbi_normal_2; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; AMDG&BVMH; amom; AndreaZingg; ...
Believe it or not this story is not from the onion or scrappleface.com it did come from the judges home planet of bizzaro world though.
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
45
posted on
09/15/2006 8:26:18 AM PDT
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
They are about to tangle with a very large group with a lot of bucks.
More money is spent on boating and fishing than any other sport....and nothing else even comes close.
46
posted on
09/15/2006 8:26:39 AM PDT
by
capt. norm
(The liberal anti-war movement = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: AdAstraPerArdua
Private vehicles on the public highways are also merely tolerated. For the time being.
47
posted on
09/15/2006 8:27:17 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Ramius
48
posted on
09/15/2006 8:27:19 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Don't mix alcopops and ufo's)
To: freepatriot32
To: AdAstraPerArdua
My suggestion ignore the ruling. If everybody who now boats on the Miss. river and other open waters continue to do their thing what are they going to do ? fine everybody, so don't pay the fines, throw you in jail ? yeah right their going to put 10 million people in jail for recreational boating on an open water way.If people continue to let reckless government rulings like this one stand, get used to having personal freedoms taken away one by one !!!
50
posted on
09/15/2006 8:28:12 AM PDT
by
Obie Wan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351-353 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson