Posted on 09/20/2006 3:24:37 AM PDT by goldstategop
You might want to check snopes.com.
I seem to have little success using snopes. (My own limited understanding of search engine useage probabbly)
Following up on your suggestion was no different, although I did try. I assume you are saying that has been challenged for accuracy? Debunked?
That's the part that amazes me. The very things they say they want will go away under the New Islamic Republic of America.
I remember when we had a school prayer before lunchtime in Texas in 1972. We also had dress codes, girls had to wear skirts or dresses no more than 6 inches above the knee or you were sent home. Of course the school could spank your butt for acting up. My dad always told me that if I ever got into that much trouble at school to deserve a spanking that I would get it twice as bad at home.
FYI:
"..This is just a more involved version of the "Communist Rules for Revolution" that were supposedly found after WWI in Germany. This is almost certainly a hoax. Read all about it at http://www.snopes.com/language/document/commrule.htm
..."
11 posted on 08/17/2003 6:46:43 PM PDT by MrShow-BobAndDavid
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/965685/posts?page=11#11
Good Article
Be prepared .. scary times are still ahead
Well, you mean Jessica Lange?
"Liberalism is the acquired immune deficiency that destroys the ability of the West to defend itself. Islamofacism is the opportunistic infection."
Is this a quotation or your own?
Beyond that though, the snopes piece primarily is dealing with something supposedly published much earlier. Plus this snipped out of the article: and noted that "the extreme right also follows rules, one of which is to make maximum use of false, misleading and fear-inspiring quotations." I mean really, how much of that really happens compared to the shenanigans of the left. One gets the idea that Rush, Ann Coulter etc. are being targeted with that comment.
Bottom line, I am not sure if snopes is any more 100% trustworthy than any other source. So, color me still a little skepticle.
Thanks for the links, BTW.
First you must discern what is Good and Evil. You must see clearly the most important principles.
Both sides will use the sword, the gun and the bomb. Both sides will accuse the other of hypocrisy and lies. Both sides will claim they are for Peace and are the true followers of the one True God.
If you cannot see clearly the underlying truths, then this will make little sense, and you risk being a pawn of the side of evil.
bttt
Perception is reality for an awful lot of people. My point was, to these people what we are doing is precisely the same as what the Left does.
I agree that these folks suffer from a moral blindness that you called "moral equivalence."
Feder's article should be a RNC ad shown in all 50 states. It would be worth the money to get it printed and put in MSM media outlets.
it's not the first time i've said it here in FR, as far as i know it's my own
Liberalism is the AIDS. Islamism is the TB.
Bump!
“Moreover, as a lazy person myself, I can assure you that low expectations for lazy people was also attributable to the generation that preceded hippies (and boomers in general).”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Maybe, but as a self-identified lazy boy born during world war two I can assure you that people who think they are hard working today cannot imagine doing the amount of physical labor I used to do as a twelve year old who did his best to avoid work. Most thirty year olds now have never in their entire life done the amount of hard labor I did in my senior year of high school and don’t expect to ever do it if they live to be 100.
My father didn’t get all the work he wanted from me but he certainly didn’t have low expectations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.