Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The United Nations: Land of Socialists, Despots and Final Warnings
Sierra Times ^ | 9/20/06 | Joanie Fischer

Posted on 09/20/2006 11:29:31 AM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy

I saw/heard the president’s address to the U.N. on C-Span this morning. I also heard the speeches of Secretary General Annan, the President of the General Assembly (Al Khalifa), and the President of Brazil (Da Silva), all of whom preceded Bush.

It's not surprising that a Muslim is now the President of the General Assembly, since the U.N. is now entirely controlled by the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

Until now, I had never witnessed the proceedings on the floor of the U.N. for any length of time, and, despite my loathing of that body as the most prominent reason for the global spread of Marxism and the emboldening of terrorism, I still found myself incensed at what I saw and heard. I literally felt in need of a shower after turning off the television -- as if I had spent the morning in a toxic waste dump.

Other than making token and hypocritical reference to the value of freedom and excellence (both of which the villainous world body disdains), every speech leading up to the president's extolled the value of, and the pressing need for, the working people of the world to give up (at the point of a gun, if need be, although that remained unsaid) a large portion of the fruits of their labor for the 'disadvantaged' of the world.

That's it. That's what the U.N. of 2006 stands for -- redistribution of wealth and prosperity, at the point of a gun, if need be (and, it goes without saying, the destruction of the state of Israel, although that, too, remained unspoken).

I am not a fan of the president. But, as I saw and heard him speaking to that malevolent body, I became acutely aware of the fact that America's days are numbered. That the rest of the world is seeking to build a future that is in direct and violent contrast to the vision of America's Founders. And that our leadership in Washington either (1) hasn't a clue as to how to go about preserving the American vision against the vile madmen who see it as their destiny to annihilate it, or (2) prefers to indirectly ally themselves with the madmen.

I'm afraid we live in a violent, unjust world -- perhaps moreso than at any time in the history of mankind. And this morning when I saw and heard leaders of virtually every nation on the globe gathered together planning how best to foist upon what remains of the free world their often violent vision of the ultimate worldwide socialist utopia...and I heard the American president speaking to them as if his words had any hope of piercing their arrogant, powerful, self-serving armor...I became indescribably sad for us all. They haven't any use for us, other than to plunder from us the hard-won rewards of our two-plus centuries of historically unparallelled liberty-based prosperity...so as to use their ill-gotten gains to see their new-world agenda to its contemptible end. And (mark my word), barring a miracle, or a significant change in the resolve of the free world, they will.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; iran; president; socialism; terrorism; un; unitednations; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: SiliconValleyGuy

"That place is a cesspool of commies, villains and socialists that aspire together to take over the powerful and successful.

They haven't always been very successful. (I wish I could find the picture the old Bolshevic pounding the UN podium with his shoe. I suppose that image has been consigned to the memory hole.)


21 posted on 09/20/2006 12:11:06 PM PDT by oyez ( The older I get, the better I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: free from tyranny

BTTT!


22 posted on 09/20/2006 12:18:22 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Yeah, that old Bolshevic "buried us," didn't he? (Thanks to Ronald Reagan!) LOL!


23 posted on 09/20/2006 12:20:12 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SiliconValleyGuy

That NYC UN building would be a heck of a place for sume luxury condos.


24 posted on 09/20/2006 12:22:01 PM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez

I remember... though Kruschev was our enemy, his reasoning wasn't blinded by suicidal hate such as fanatic Ahmadnutjob.


25 posted on 09/20/2006 12:23:51 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SiliconValleyGuy

It's also known that the federal fascist bureaucrats are implementing unratified UN treaties.

Example -

In 1994, the US senate rejected the UN Biodiversity Treaty. The treaty called for setting aside vast expanses of public and private land for biodiversity, whatever the hell that means in UN soft law interpretation.

Clinton told the bureaucracy to implement the treaty anyway.

Result -

The federal bureaucracy let loose with the endangered species act and clean water act to remove millions of acres of property, both public and private, from development.

And now the USSC has stepped in with Kelo, which essentially takes all private property and sets it on the sales block to further the collective Marxist good as defined by the state.


26 posted on 09/20/2006 12:43:03 PM PDT by sergeantdave (Consider that nearly half the people you pass on the street meet Lenin's definition of useful idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton
That NYC UN building would be a heck of a place for sume luxury condos.

Or the "northern branch" of the Pentagon.

27 posted on 09/20/2006 12:58:49 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Un-friggin-believable. Just another lesser known branch of the "Clinton Legacy."


28 posted on 09/20/2006 12:59:54 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

Kruschev did know his limitations. Nicky conducted foreign affairs like a school yard bully. He at one point he thought he had JFK on the ropes. After the Cuban Missile Crisis the Grand Soviet decide that Kruschev wasn't entertaining any more. p>


29 posted on 09/20/2006 2:25:36 PM PDT by oyez ( The older I get, the better I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Chavez

illiterate drug-lord

30 posted on 09/20/2006 2:27:15 PM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SiliconValleyGuy
She definitely gets it. So, what's her problem with Pres. Bush? He makes me mad on a number of issues but not at all in this context. Unless it's not being aggressive enough on terrorists.

If you have to make concessions to your liberal friends by de facto bashing of Bush then your support for the war against the war against civilization your just spitting in the wind. You're either with us or with the enemy. That isn't political sloganeering that's reality.

As for wealth redistribution ... socialism sucks. Here, there or anywhere. It's the poison that pees in everyone's rice bowl equally.

31 posted on 09/20/2006 3:02:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; joanie-f
She definitely gets it. So, what's her problem with Pres. Bush?

I wouldn't attempt to speak for her, but the author of this Sierra Times article is Freeper joanie-f. I know she has major criticisms of Bush's stand on our open border and on his spending, so I suspect that is what she means when she says she's not a fan. I'm pinging this to her so maybe she'll answer herself. ;)

32 posted on 09/20/2006 6:32:44 PM PDT by SiliconValleyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SiliconValleyGuy; joanie-f
Yikes! I'm a big fan of joanie-f. I didn't know (should have) her actual surname/pen name. My apologies, joanie!

I do know why you're not a fan in that context.

(arghhh. crawling back into my cave)

33 posted on 09/22/2006 6:25:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson