Posted on 09/20/2006 3:16:24 PM PDT by reaganson77
Giving heart attack survivors stem cells from their own bone marrow did little to repair their damaged hearts, according to the three best studies to date of this controversial therapy.
The modest results suggest more study is needed and, some scientists say, demonstrate the need to lift political limits on using cells from embryos, which offer more promise for turning into heart-repairing tissue.
The optimal cell type has not been discovered yet, said Dr. Kenneth Chien, director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cardiovascular Research Center, who had no role in the studies.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
Modest results are better than NO results, which is exactly what embryonic stem cell use has had.
You don't reckon these guys have any agenda at all, do you? /sarc
I am sure that embryonic stem cells would enable us to regenerate hearts.
But this study doesn't sound to me as if it actually proved anything about the type of stem cells used, since the delivery method seems quite likely to be the explanation for lack of success.
A tiny balloon momentarily blocked regular blood flow into the heart and stem cells were injected in an attempt to give them a couple of minutes to try to take root.
It's hardly surprising that having the cells briefly sloshing around in the blood inside the heart wouldn't cause them to "take root", since that obviously bears no resemblance at all to the way functional cardiac muscle cells came to be present in the heart. I wonder if somebody has tried injecting the stem cells into the heart muscle itself, where the cells would sit in place and be surrounded by the factors that normally surround functioning cardiac muscle cells.
More likely to regenerate WHOLE hearts for transplants, though, rather than regenerate tissue in an existing heart.
Adult Stem Cell Research At UB Targets Damaged Hearts
Umbilical Cord Blood Limits Heart Attack Damage
Adult Stem Cells Improve Cardiac Function And Blood Flow In Patients With Heart Disease (Bone Marrow)
Bone Marrow Stem Cells May Heal Hearts Even Years After Heart Attacks
Menstrual Blood Yields Stem Cells (Makes Heart Cells)
Co. Puts Stem Cells In Failing Hearts
Stem Cells From Fat
Singer Don Ho Says Procedure Saved Him
Heart Attack Patients Use Own Stem Cells To Heal, Research Finds
Israeli Stem Cell Research Shows Umbilical Cord Blood Can Rejuvenate Damaged Heart Tissue
Heart Attack Patients Use Own Stem Cells To Heal, Research Finds
Stem Cells With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Heart Failure Patient Shows Astonishing Improvement
Stem Cell Study For Patients With Heart Attack Damage Seeks To Regenerate Heart Muscle
Stem Cells Might Fight Circulatory Disorder Peripheral Arterial Disease
Cells derived from heart stem cells can repair heart attack damage
Study launched to study effect of using ADULT stem cells to prevent congestive heart failure
Cloning the heart (using ADULT Stem Cells)
Administering Stem Cells To Patients With Myocardial Infarction Leads To Reduction Of The Infarct
embryonic research is about 10 years old.
adult is decades old. The limited amount of funding from private sources will be unable to keep pace with the needs of the stem cell research community.
thanks for the ping...
I think the issue of delivery is going to be as big a challenge as getting the cells (embryonic or adult) to differentiate as needed. Per my previous post, this delivery method sounds sort of bizarre to me. Perhaps there's evidence of that sort of approach having some effectiveness in animal studies, though I haven't heard about it. If any kind of stem cells were prone to sticking to the interior of the heart and "taking root" there, it seems to me that everybody's heart would be getting clogged up pretty fast, since there are various types of stem cells circulating in the blood normally (some of which were used in one of these studies).
If the FDA would get out of the way and let some of this research in adult stem cells be done on WILLING patients in the US, I believe you will see money coming from everywhere going into this research.
Since when is adult stem cell therapy "controversial"?
Of course, researchers in just about ANY scientific field will readily claim that they need government funding, because private funding "won't be enough". Personally I'd like to see both embryonic and adult stem cell research plow ahead with no government funding, and as much private funding as the researchers can get their hands on. Private money tends to get spent much more judiciously than tax money.
I have yet to hear any claim of potential for either adult or embryonic stem cell research and treatment derived therefrom, that pertains to any legitimate PUBLIC health issue. Show me how it's going to effectively highly contagious diseases, bioterrorism attacks, etc., and I'll see the need for public funding. But we should also pull public funding for every other type of medical research that isn't clearly related to PUBLIC health threats.
SARCSM, SARCASM, SARCASM
LOL. Would you like to borrow my tag line?
OK
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.