Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.J. court tells police limits on car searches don't apply to homes
Star-Ledger Staff ^ | Thursday, September 21, 2006 | BY ROBERT SCHWANEBERG

Posted on 09/21/2006 3:53:20 PM PDT by Focault's Pendulum

In New Jersey, one's home is not one's castle after all. The real castle, it turns out, is the car.

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled 4-3 yesterday that police do not need a reason to ask permission to search someone's home.

The same court four years ago issued rules saying police must have a good reason before asking motorists if they can search their cars.

Yesterday the court said the rules for cars -- which prohibit police from asking motorists if they can conduct a search unless they have "a reasonable and articulable suspicion" of criminal activity -- are designed specifically to combat racial profiling on the state's highways and do not apply to searches of homes.

(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 4a; 4thamendment; blackrobedthugs; blackrobedtyrants; bozoronewjersey; constitutionalchaos; constitutioninexile; downtheshore; fourthamendment; freekinjersey; gardenstate; gardenstateparkway; govwatch; judicialoligarchy; libertarians; newjersey; nj; njtp; propertyrights; racialprofiling; search; searchandseizure; seizure; sopranos; thegardenstate; thesopranos; whatexit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: Gondring
Thanks for the ping. Quite an interesting thread. Glad I'm retired! ;o)
101 posted on 09/21/2006 11:43:54 PM PDT by jan in Colorado ("Show me what Mohamed brought that was new & you 'll find only evil and inhuman")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
I work every weekend near the bar/nightlife area in my town. I have seen this exact scenario repeated countless times over the years. Almost always, the police take all of the stuff out of the vehicle, leave it lying all over the parking lot, and then get back in their vehicles and drive off; leaving an innocent motorist to spend the next 20 or 30 minutes picking up all of his stuff and putting it back in the trunk.

The drug dog always indicates that drugs are present in the vehicle. The police definition of "probable cause" is very different from mine.

102 posted on 09/22/2006 12:05:20 AM PDT by j. earl carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
Liberals believe you have privacy in your car but not in your home! I wonder what brought them to that kind of conclusion?

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

103 posted on 09/22/2006 2:14:05 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
"I suspect his dog "found something" in order to justify a further search."

I contend this as well although a while back on another thread a LEO said I was dead wrong.

Nonetheless if the dog "detects" something it then creates probable cause, giving them license to check it. Yeah, sure, every LEO is a model citizen and everyone who doesn't submit is a scumbag.

I've been told that when asked I should ask what's their probably cause for searching, but I've always figured that'd just p' them off even more.

104 posted on 09/22/2006 2:23:43 AM PDT by Proud_texan (Philosophy consists very largely of one philosopher arguing that all others are jackasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Yeah, that's the usual routine. Last time they did that to me the excuse was, "The dog alerted to something around your bumper." Afterwards, another cop showed up, one who liked me, and he told me, that on Thursday evenings they like to give the dog a workout.


105 posted on 09/22/2006 2:33:05 AM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

BUMP


106 posted on 09/22/2006 3:10:45 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

For what it's worth, a couple of years ago I had a bit of a run-in with the (now former) captain of the southeast region of the TN highway patrol, Lucious Howard. He was honestly one of the worst people I have ever met. I did at least have the pleasure of making him look rather foolish, though.


107 posted on 09/22/2006 4:38:18 AM PDT by Sloth ('It Takes A Village' is problematic when you're raising your child in Sodom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

So...is the lesson, "Never trust a cop from Tennessee?" ;-)


108 posted on 09/22/2006 5:18:12 AM PDT by Gondring (Hindus think it's abominable to use cattle for terrorism; when they detonate, Muslims call it noble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
He will do that to someone who has some time on their hands and will find out where he and the dog live. Then leave a few hot dogs laced with Drano or some such for the payback to begin. Cops can be nasty. So can their victims.
109 posted on 09/22/2006 5:34:44 AM PDT by sportsterinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
"When a police officer asks if they can step inside my home, I politely decline and step outside to speak with them."

How often does a police officer ask to step inside your home?

110 posted on 09/22/2006 5:38:50 AM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

Did he like your car?


111 posted on 09/22/2006 5:46:13 AM PDT by A. Pole (Solzhenitsyn:Anyone who proclaimed violence his method inexorably must choose lying as his principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steveegg

"This would be the same Kangaroo Court that said that the 'RATS and only the 'RATS can replace candidates after filing deadlines at will."

If Menendez loses any more ground, look for a replacement.


112 posted on 09/22/2006 6:00:47 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Freedom by its nature cannot be imposed, it must be chosen")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
1) was this a highway patrolman or a local cop, and if so, what jurisdiction?

2) in some states you may have a legal basis to declare the dog defective, iirc, and pursue this course.. not sure if TN is one.


Local, city cop. I just phoned my lawyer, we'll see.
113 posted on 09/22/2006 7:12:28 AM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Did he like your car?

I wouldn't think so. I drove our "baby mobile", a silver Malibu Maxx.
114 posted on 09/22/2006 7:15:56 AM PDT by Jaysun (Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
The police need a warrant before they can enter the premises.

All they need is permission.

When a police officer asks if they can step inside my home, I politely decline and step outside to speak with them.

Why would they ask to step inside your home?

115 posted on 09/22/2006 7:22:09 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meyer; Jaysun
I'd certainly consider getting a lawyer. Trumped-up false dog-sniffing BS isn't probably cause - it's harassment.

Lawyers cost money. The guy lost a half hour of his life. What is that worth? Maybe a couple of sawbucks? It will cost him thousands of dollars and maybe months off his life to pursue this matter. I say get over it.

116 posted on 09/22/2006 7:31:56 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney; Jaysun
Sitting on a jury is free (well, you do lose time and pay). But when the cop is on the witness stand, or better yet the defendant, there's your chance for revenge.

Are you suggesting he do something dishonest? Are you suggesting he let a guilty person go free just to spite the cops?

117 posted on 09/22/2006 7:37:33 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

bookmarking


118 posted on 09/22/2006 8:10:00 AM PDT by EdReform (Protect our 2nd Amendment Rights - Join the NRA today - www.nra.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

"I don't know. It was in Fayetteville, just across the Alabama state line. I did speed and I took my ticket, but beyond that this was absurd."

My favorite police traffic abuse story:

I was in the military driving in a military car from NY to Cape Cod for a military conference. On the interstate in Conn, at sunrise (driving right into the sun), I was driving 65 during the 55mph silliness under Carter. As I drove along with the sun in my face, I noted a black shape on the side of the road, a car minus any markings and the silouette of a person, minus hat, standing on the side of the road pointing at the ground. I figured he was warning me of some obstacle, the one that stopped him, slowed down, got into the outside lane, and drove past. When I got up to the car I note the figure standing there was a cop minus smokey bear hat and was having a fit. He runs to his car, throws it in gear, goes screaming after me at perhaps 90, even though I am already slowing down to stop, throws himself in front of me and slams on the brakes, causing me to nearly hit him.

By then I was more than a bit hot but restrained myself expecting a speeding ticket (the Conn tax). Instead this idiot writes me up for failure to stop, reckless driving and speeding.

I did note he was in the rising sun and out of uniform in an unmarked car and that HE was the only person driving recklessly but the silly twit was too full of self importance to care. All told the fine was over $400 in 1970's bucks.

My next favorite bit of abuse was an accident on a military base. I am at a 4 way stop. To my left also stopped is a big honking truck with other cars sort of visible behind it. As I had the right of way, I proceeded half way across the street where I was promptly smashed into by the police car that had been stopped in traffic behind the truck but was too self important to obey the traffic laws. The cops decided to pass the stopped truck and run the stop sign. No lights, no siren, and no emergency. They promptly gave me a ticket for failure to yield! This time I knew the military judge who threw the case out and dumped all over the police.


119 posted on 09/22/2006 8:24:34 AM PDT by Jim Verdolini (We had it all, but the RINOs stalked the land and everything they touched was as dung and ashes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tiger-one

"Cops can lie to get to the truth"

Or lie to get a ticket quota. Fortunately most are simply too honest to play games with folk


120 posted on 09/22/2006 8:32:23 AM PDT by Jim Verdolini (We had it all, but the RINOs stalked the land and everything they touched was as dung and ashes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson