Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What do you make of this, folks?
1 posted on 09/21/2006 6:07:24 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Aussie Dasher

Last I'd heard, it's correct.


2 posted on 09/21/2006 6:08:27 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

It was southern Dems that started the KKK, but I don't think MLK was a Republican.


3 posted on 09/21/2006 6:08:30 PM PDT by loreldan (Without coffee I am nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

its probably true. Not only that i bet most Democrats are criminals too.


4 posted on 09/21/2006 6:09:47 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Well,of course THEY did!His name is Nathan Bedford Forrest!!By the way,(in case Charlie Rangel doesn't know),"Bull"Conner was a DemonRat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 09/21/2006 6:10:03 PM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

6 posted on 09/21/2006 6:11:45 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

I don't know about the MLK thing (it might be true I just have never heard it before) the KKK thing seems pretty accurate though.


7 posted on 09/21/2006 6:12:15 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Er, ah... Well, it happens to be true. After the Civil War southern Democrats did form the White Leagues, or the Ku Klux Klan, as they're more commonly known. But in 1876 the Republicans, to their eternal discredit, effectively agreed to turn a blind eye to the actions of the KKK, in exchange for the southern electoral votes needed to put Rutherford B. Hayes in the Presidency.
9 posted on 09/21/2006 6:15:20 PM PDT by Lucretia Borgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Can't wait for this to be released.

Exclusive to NewsMax.com
By Jason Apuzzo & Govindini Murty

New Film Praises Republicans' Role in Civil Rights Movement

snip

Nina May and Tricia Erickson's inspiring new film "Emancipation, Revelation, Revolution" is one such documentary that portrays the foundational role of the Republican Party in ending slavery and supporting the Civil Rights movement. The film argues that the Republican Party was created to end slavery. Major legal reforms and acts of legislation passed to give black Americans the vote; and full civil rights, equal to whites, were created and passed by Republican legislators.

http://www.errvideo.com/Press/newfilm.html


10 posted on 09/21/2006 6:15:44 PM PDT by be4everfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Nothing matters but the truth here. Anyone know what it is.

The attempts to discredit the information are going to be intense. However, if your going to make the claim be ready with the documented facts of the case, in fact you should lead with them becaues the MSM is not going to let your facts post claim reach the airwaves in front of bellicose staged indignation...

11 posted on 09/21/2006 6:16:07 PM PDT by Eddie01 (please let me know if I missed anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

MLK a Republican? No way!
Democrats-KKK? True!


12 posted on 09/21/2006 6:17:25 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

The ad is the truth.

Lincoln and the Republicans and the abolitionists were on the same side.

The southern and northern democrats were content to retain slavery with no protest permitted.

All of the anti-black sentiment from the Civil War until now came out of the Democrat party. Everything from George Wallace to Jim Crow was Democrat.


13 posted on 09/21/2006 6:18:14 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troo This means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

African Americans should come home to their true home, the party of Lincoln and Emancipation.


14 posted on 09/21/2006 6:18:39 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Wouldn't MLK be registered as either a republican or Democrat? It seems like that would be public record.
17 posted on 09/21/2006 6:22:00 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

I think MLK, Sr., was a Republican.


19 posted on 09/21/2006 6:24:26 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

They can always argue, "what's in the name?" The 'roles' seem to be exchanged. After all, nowadays the South is Republican strength, and those places that used to be the bastion of Republican party slowly turned Democrats. I wonder if at one point Republican was seen as the 'progressive, liberal' party in social issue, while Democrat was the more conservative one. On economic issue, the roles seem the same as today, I think.


24 posted on 09/21/2006 6:29:37 PM PDT by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
The book, "North and South", gives an interesting description of politics during the cival war.

It is absolutely true, that the Democratic party was the party of rich southern slave owners.

It is also true, that the Republicans in NY rioted against the draft, not wanting to die to defend a bunch of southern slaves.

No one's hands are clean.

25 posted on 09/21/2006 6:29:59 PM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

Lot's of good first hand info of the period during and after the War Between the States here: http://memory.loc.gov/wpaintro/wpahome.html

Search for "reconstruction" and "KKK" (and its variants). You will see why it was impossible for a Republican to get elected in the South for almost a hunderd years after reconstruction. Democrats were elected because they would keep the Negro down.

A good book, still available, is Charles William Ramsdell's RECONSTRUCTION IN TEXAS (copyright 1910).


26 posted on 09/21/2006 6:30:15 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

It's histroically accurate.

Don't know how it'll play though....without seeing the ad...


27 posted on 09/21/2006 6:30:41 PM PDT by MikefromOhio ("...America has confronted evil before, and we have defeated it...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher

The KKK was the militant wing of the Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party was the author of the "Jim Crow" racial laws, they were the party of race obsession and race repression for a century after the Civil War, and they were the party dedicated to the protection of slavery as an institution prior to the war.

The Republican Party was started by religious folk who abandoned their previous party because it refused to take a stand on slavery. The GOP was the "abolitionist" party from day one.

The abolitionist movement was a distinct minority in politics prior to the Civil War, even in the North, but from the moment the party was established to the moment slavery was abolished, only a very few years passed, only a decade; you could almost choose to see the hand of God, were you so inclined. They formed in the mid-1850s; elected Lincoln in 1860, and slavery was gone by 1865.

They opposed Jim Crow race repression all during the bad old days, and were the Civil Rights party when Civil Rights wasn't cool.

When you see old photographs of lynch mobs, of civil rights marchers being put down with fire hoses and clubs, when you see photos of crosses burning, you should understand that these are photos of Democrats in action. The men with the guns and the clubs and the ropes and the torches are Democrats, every last one of them. Thats their history. You can understand why they want so badly to re-write history. It isn't very pretty.


28 posted on 09/21/2006 6:31:03 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aussie Dasher
Why would Martin Luther King, Jr. NOT be a member of the party of Lincoln?

The Dems do not want to empower blacks, they want to keep them down and dependent on the government.
29 posted on 09/21/2006 6:31:22 PM PDT by msnimje (Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson