He's also tied in to Hizb ut tahrir, Savior sect, and the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood).
Posted on 09/21/2006 6:38:46 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
'...I guess this doesn't qualify as "hate speech"?'
Looks like 'hate speech' only applies to those of us who are critical of death threats from islamonazi's.
Your observation brings back memories. Hardly a case for cold-case files though.
In the 1960's a Polish "refugee" came to London. He built an empire of vice. He ran young girls. Murky figures who were prominent politicians, were to partake of the "forbidden fruit". He was Peter Rachman. The whole thing was ready to break via the press. (Ok, ok to the point).
He had a slight heart murmur. He was admitted to the Middlesex Hospital, for tests. Healthy otherwise.
Rachman exited in a black box. Ahem, complications unforseen, every care taken.
They have their chance again. As the Duke of Windsor said in the 1930's- "Something must be done". Laughs
He's also tied in to Hizb ut tahrir, Savior sect, and the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood).
He's also tied in to Hizb ut tahrir, Savior sect, and the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood).
-----
and he's entitled to claim welfare? The english are NUTS!
The author of this article seems to think he will be embarrassed by youthful sins of drinking and promiscuity.
So, he sinned, and then he got religion. If that were all, it would be no big deal.
If he had any real conscience, he would be a lot more embarrassed by his current behavior: abandoning his family, leaching off his neighbors and his country, and conspiring to kill people. But I'm sure he's proud of it. That's the problem with Islam in a nutshell.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.