Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRCC pulls Graf ads in Arizona
thehill.com ^ | September 22, 2006 | Aaron Blake

Posted on 09/22/2006 12:07:50 PM PDT by VU4G10

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: onyx
Graf won the primary and it is his duty and the duty of his supporters to see that he is elected. The GOP and RNC should back him 100%

Really? Even though graf didn't condemn the $175,000 in DNC help to defeat huffman.

Like I said it is the democrats who are smiling about graf's win, it was money well invested for them.

41 posted on 09/22/2006 4:18:13 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

BUMP --- that is my original point: David Duke needs to stay the hell out of politics.

Now back to my other concern: David Duke knows he's radio active, so why does he publicly and vociferously and monetarily back some candidates? I question his motives seriously.


42 posted on 09/22/2006 4:19:22 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I am just as concerned about the RNC backing Kolbe's guy as I am about the democrats lending support to Graf.

It was an OPRN seat and should have been left to the individuals to raise their own campaign funds. (In a perfect world).


Voters decided. I hope Graf wins.


43 posted on 09/22/2006 4:21:25 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: onyx

You raise an interesting point. There's gotta be an underlying reason why he's meddling in Arizona.


44 posted on 09/22/2006 4:22:28 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: onyx

OPEN seat.


45 posted on 09/22/2006 4:22:44 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I am just as concerned about the RNC backing Kolbe's guy as I am about the democrats lending support to Graf.

The DNC was for graf in the GOP priumary, the RNC against him.

That should tell you something, even though you wish not to admit it.

46 posted on 09/22/2006 4:23:19 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
I swear these "true Conservatives" spend more time aligning themselves with kooks and reprobates, it's no wonder they turn voters off.

Better kooks and reprobates than RNC bootlickers

47 posted on 09/22/2006 4:24:34 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dane; onyx
It's no secret that Democrats have been actively trying to set themselves up to win in red states in the west.

That may be part of the reason they backed Graf. Graf presents an easy target for them to destroy later.

48 posted on 09/22/2006 4:24:56 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Michael Weiner is that you? Shouldn't you be doing a radio show about now?


49 posted on 09/22/2006 4:25:39 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dane


What am I trying not to admit?

That the DNC deemed Kolbe's guy more of a threat so they backed Graf?

That's a DUH, Dane, but it doesn't lessen my concern.


50 posted on 09/22/2006 4:26:22 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
That may be part of the reason they backed Graf. Graf presents an easy target for them to destroy later.

And who's fault is that. I would say graf's, especially with david duke gravitating towards him.

51 posted on 09/22/2006 4:29:13 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dane

1 - Unless Graf asked for or thanked Duke for his 'support', that should be a non-issue. I dare say Duke has 'endorsed' Republicans far more often than he has Democrats - does that make republicans racists?

If Duke wanted Graf elected, he would have kept his unwelcome mouth shut.

2 - Dems prefered to run against Graf because Graf is more conservative. The question is, Is Graf too conservative for a republican majority district?

That is something for the voters to decide, preferably based on issues rather than smears. Unfortunately, the dems don't even need to smear Graf - his fellow republicans (like yourself) are doing it for them.

Do you enjoy doing the work of Howard Dean, Dane?

I live in this district, Dane. It ain't Rhode Island, or Maine, or California. I understand when they elect RINO's, since dems outnumber them and even the republicans are mostly RINOs, themselves. But the republicans here aren't libs, or even moderates. And immigration is an issue where many dems agree with us on - so why not TRY?

But it hurts when supposed allies stab us in the back.


52 posted on 09/22/2006 4:29:29 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Dems don't need to destroy Graf. There are plenty of Republicans here on FR that are willing to do it for them!


53 posted on 09/22/2006 4:30:33 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
If Duke wanted Graf elected, he would have kept his unwelcome mouth shut.

david duke is a meglomaniac, he thinks his word is divine. He ain't going to shut up.

That duke wished to cozy up to graf speaks volumes about graf.

54 posted on 09/22/2006 4:31:50 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Dems don't need to destroy Graf.

Graf destroyed graf, especially with his rhetoric that would make david duke want to cozy up to him.

55 posted on 09/22/2006 4:33:08 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

FGS --- not one poster on the whole of FR will have any influence on the outcome of this race.

Have a look at the state flags. Few posters reside in AZ let alone in his district.

Y'all can see to his election. I wish him and y'all the best of luck. He can certainly win and I think he will.


56 posted on 09/22/2006 4:35:23 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Dane

It's Graf's fault he hasn't denounced Duke and told Duke where he can take his endorsement.


57 posted on 09/22/2006 4:37:06 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Can you quote that rhetoric? I haven't heard it.

Has Graf talked about white supremacy, or suggested blacks and latinos are sub-human?

Has he said something like, "Kick the spics outta here?"

Just what rhetoric are you talking about? My filipina wife voted for Graf - is she a David Duke supporter?


58 posted on 09/22/2006 4:51:22 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

The fact that duke supports graf, and graf's belated condemnation speaks volumes.


59 posted on 09/22/2006 4:55:05 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: All; bayourod; Dane
Please note that Dane's pledge to support the party nominee lasted all of one week.

Dane is the biggest hypocrite on the planet. He constantly attacked Tancredo for burning bridges with other Republicans, then demands Graf burn bridges with other Republicans who supported him in the primary. He accuses the DNC of being for Graf and the RNC being against Graf, then a week after he "endorses" the GOP nominee, he starts using DNC talking points against him and opposes the RNC position on immigration. I bet Dane's little buddy, the now banned BayouRINO, is probably writing a big fat check to DemocRAT nominee Giffords as we speak.

I knew Dane's "endorsement" of Graf and pledge to back the choice of Republican Party voters wouldn't last more than a few days. The Danes and BayouRINOs of FR accuse others of undermining the GOP in order to justify their open borders position, but it is them who openly assist Dems if they don't get their way in the primary.

You don't see me giving aid and comfort to Bill Nelson because my candidate didn't win the primary.

Dane is a pitiful sore loser consumed with hated of Graf and anyone else who follows the GOP's 180 year old tradition on limited, legal immigration.

60 posted on 09/22/2006 5:16:05 PM PDT by BillyBoy (ILLINOIS ELECTION "CHOICES:" Rod Bag-o-$hit or Judas Barf Too-Pinka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson