Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2006 12:38:10 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Jorsett

More money for less work. I believe that has been the union way for some time. Just ask all the steel workers, oh yeah, I forgot, there aren't any.


2 posted on 09/22/2006 12:41:00 PM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

"Paycheck protection legislation has a clear neg­ative effect on public sector union contribu­tions to candidates for state legislative offices"

I wonder what effect it has on private sector union contributions.


3 posted on 09/22/2006 12:42:13 PM PDT by Roccus (Dealing with Democrats IS the War on Terror. [Stolen from FReeper Stallone])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

Any union that does business with state, local or federal governments, police or fire, teachers, etc. should be prohibited by law from engaging in political activities, donations, or endorsements. And that's my opinion.


6 posted on 09/22/2006 12:44:37 PM PDT by AbeKrieger (Liberals are the Mongol hordes destroying America from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

As a former union member myself I can tell you what my biggest problems with unions are.

First would be union involvement in politics. Unions need to mind their own business and stop taking money from members to support politicians the members may not support.

Second is scale based pay. I think people should be paid based on merit. There's nothing more irritating that struggling with a project because the guy watching you struggle "doesn't get paid for THAT job".


7 posted on 09/22/2006 12:47:09 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett
They also get a leadership that pursues its own priorities outside of negotiating employment con­ditions, priorities which may or may not reflect union members’ wishes.

Anyone remember the California Grocery Store strike? Union leaders, who make $300,000+ a year, had these people almost destitute (while the leadership didn't miss a single paycheck), and ended up with a contract that was worse than the one originally proposed by Management.

Yeah, I want these guys on my side.

8 posted on 09/22/2006 12:47:52 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Insultification is the polar opposite of Niceosity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett
Doesn't matter what they want.
Doesn't matter if they got most of the mafia out of their unions.
What matters is they seem to be paid way out of line for compared to what nonunion folks do in the private sector and they in the end close down the companies they got the big contracts from and end all the jobs because the company can't compete.

The last refuge of these scoundrels seems to be government connected jobs where there seems to be the endless ability to tax people more and more to compensate people at 200% of private sector value.
IMO it needs to stop.
A nice law that no government employee job should exceed the average wage and benefits of what is found in the private sector.
Probably would pay back the national debt in 7 years with that one.
9 posted on 09/22/2006 12:49:56 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett
Unions should not spend any money on candidates or political parties.

I believe it is perfectly reasonable for unions to endorse individual candidates based on their positions and voting record.

10 posted on 09/22/2006 12:53:26 PM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett

What union memebers want? Well, I want the security to know I won't get fired for turnin in a legitamate safety violation. I want the security I won't lose my job because the bosses dumbass brother-in-law needs a job and can't get one because he's a dumbass. I want the security to say no to mowing the bosses lawn, building him a deck or watching his pets when he's on vacation with the idea I won't lose my job. Those are the ones that get promoted to supervision and that's fine with me. I know I'm in the minority here and I will get flamed but there are two sides to every coin. But I know YOU won't see it.


11 posted on 09/22/2006 12:57:39 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I get homesick when I look up in the skies and see my home planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Jorsett
Paycheck protection legislation has a clear negative effect on public sector union contributions to candidates for state legislative offices. These laws reduce union campaign donations by approximately 50 percent. The odds of random chance explaining these results are less than one percent.

That's why unions have fought these laws tooth and nail.

21 posted on 09/22/2006 1:10:35 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson