To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B-Chan; barkeep; ..
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
2 posted on
09/25/2006 5:00:21 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Hugo Chavez is the Devil! The podium still smells of sulfur...)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"NASCO is there to help facilitate these solutions."
Bull$hite.
I take it this article is available in Chinese?
3 posted on
09/25/2006 5:02:09 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The MSM: State run Democrat media masquerading as corporations)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
No way is the US going to give up its pesos.
4 posted on
09/25/2006 5:02:16 PM PDT by
CindyDawg
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Unfortunately goofball theories aren't limited to the Left. There are nuts aplenty on both sides to keep the conspiracy theory industry going for quite a ways.
6 posted on
09/25/2006 5:04:45 PM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is no planned NAFTA Superhighway.Jerome Corsi will be deeply saddened.
7 posted on
09/25/2006 5:05:15 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Everybody gets a black helocopter but meee.
8 posted on
09/25/2006 5:16:32 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do I understand correctly, that "inland ports" will allow outbound freight to check through Mexican customs in, say, Kansas, which means they don't have to check through customs again at the Mexican border... ? Theoretically if they have a certificate issued at the "inland port" they won't have to open up again at the border...?
Will Mexican trucking companies handle that traffic, since it is intended to drive straight through into Mexico? Meaning Mexican trucking companies will operate on the US side of the border as far inland as, well, Kansas? Or will US truckers haul the load as far as the border, and then drop it for Mexican drivers to pick up there?
Is their any equivalent "inland port" on the Mexican side of the border envisioned?
9 posted on
09/25/2006 5:19:38 PM PDT by
marron
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Alright...this should make aluminum foil futures climb a few points.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"As a tri-national, nonprofit, trade and transportation coalition, we are committed to ..."
Another example of NGOs taking control from national governments.
15 posted on
09/25/2006 5:55:31 PM PDT by
ViLaLuz
(Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS. JUST MOVE ALONG.20 posted on
09/25/2006 6:46:44 PM PDT by
NaughtiusMaximus
(Aside from abortion, perversion, sedition and corruption, what do the Democrats stand for?)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The fact this organization has to come out and defend itself, makes me a little more than skeptical. When was the last time our Gov. or a multinational consortium told us the 'complete' truth about anything?
24 posted on
09/26/2006 4:14:47 AM PDT by
wolfcreek
(You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson