To: SirLinksalot
Iders look at the same evidence but come up with the conclusion that Random mutation plus natural selection cannot produce the complexity of life as we see it. THAT's WHATs wrong. IDers don't go to the Bible at all. Many IDers are agnostic. Ah. Agnostic but believing in some sort of Q Continuum interloper. By defintion this is neither falsifiable nor testable.
You have but to produce the Designer for an interview and ID wins the day. But if said Dsigner keeps skulking in the shadows, ID is useless as a scientific idea and fails as a Scientific Theory.
639 posted on
09/28/2006 6:33:09 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
To: freedumb2003
Ah. Agnostic but believing in some sort of Q Continuum interloper. By defintion this is neither falsifiable nor testable. You have but to produce the Designer for an interview and ID wins the day. But if said Dsigner keeps skulking in the shadows, ID is useless as a scientific idea and fails as a Scientific Theory.
HA HA HA, and you have produced the testable and repeatable random mutation plus natural selection producing life ? Producing complexity ?
That would be news to me.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson