Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress bans internet gambling
Reuters/Washington Post ^ | 9/30/06 | Peter Kaplan

Posted on 09/30/2006 9:43:50 AM PDT by Alterboy1964

Congress approves Internet gambling ban bill

By Peter Kaplan Reuters Saturday, September 30, 2006; 12:52 AM

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Most forms of Internet gambling would be banned under a bill that received final U.S. congressional approval early Saturday.

The House of Representatives and Senate approved the measure and sent it to President George W. Bush to sign into law.

The bill, a compromise between earlier versions passed by the two chambers, would make it illegal for banks and credit card companies to make payments to online gambling sites.

Democrats had accused Republicans of pushing the bill to placate its conservative base, particularly the religious right, before the November 7 congressional elections.

"It's been over 10 years in the making. The enforcement provisions provided by this bill will go a long way to stop these illegal online operations," said Sen. Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican and a chief sponsor of the measure.

Negotiators from the Republican-led House and Senate reached a deal on the legislation Friday and attached it to unrelated legislation to bolster port security, which the Congress approved.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican and potential 2008 presidential candidate, recently appeared at a hearing in Iowa -- the state that holds the first presidential nominating contest for the 2008 election -- to listen to concerns about Internet gambling.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abuse; comingforyou; control; gambling; governmentcontrol; helpless; internet; lookout; responsibility; scary; trollbait; waste
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-270 next last
To: doc

Amen.


81 posted on 09/30/2006 10:23:54 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

You signed up just to post this?


82 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:13 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"If the President hasn't signed this yet...he shouldn't"


He won't. it was tacked on to the Port Security by Bill Frist in the Senate and Dennis Hastert in House. The Port Security Bill passed unanimously in then Senate and with only two votes against in the House. It is highly probable that most members of Congress didn't even know the anti-gambling legislation was in the bill when they voted on it.


83 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:33 AM PDT by Alterboy1964
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

ping


84 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:48 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
See The Web: WTO's gambling deadline missed.
85 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Treaty Fetishism: "[The] belief that a piece of paper will alter the behavior of thugs." R. Lowry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Can't trust any of those pigs.

I've been saying that for years!!!!

86 posted on 09/30/2006 10:24:57 AM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: durasell
I could get half a dozen guys to run a website. A casino hotel employs hundreds.

You conveniently forget that businesses are primarily in business to make money.

Why spend millions of dollars in start-up costs, hiring, construction, land, etc. when they can run the same enterprise for a fraction of the cost?

87 posted on 09/30/2006 10:26:12 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
If the websites are overseas, it is very possible (if not probable) that some of these sites are funding terrorism and the like.

Not likely. This is a capitalistic endeavor. The goal of the terrorists is to destroy the infratructure that makes capitalism possible.

88 posted on 09/30/2006 10:26:30 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964
Nanny State BS ping...for all those smoking ban, trans fat ban, etc. ban, folks.

Good bye personal freedoms!

89 posted on 09/30/2006 10:27:12 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I bet this is the dumbest post I read today.


90 posted on 09/30/2006 10:27:50 AM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: durasell

With the rake they are taking no doubt.........


91 posted on 09/30/2006 10:27:55 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You conveniently forget that businesses are primarily in business to make money.




Just saying that if I were in congress, I'd support bills that either created jobs or kept jobs in the U.S. Flame me if you will, but that's my opinion on the situation.


92 posted on 09/30/2006 10:28:47 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964
Betting on football games, poker hands, and dogs over the internet is dangerous and immoral. Betting on horses over the internet on the other hand; that's as wholesome and American as apple pie.

I've just about had it with the Republicans and corrupt Congresscriminals in general.

93 posted on 09/30/2006 10:29:17 AM PDT by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why spend millions of dollars in start-up costs, hiring, construction, land, etc. when they can run the same enterprise for a fraction of the cost?

Because it's not "the same enterprise" anymore than sitting in front of your PC every waking hour for a week provides the same experience as a week's vacation in Las Vegas.

94 posted on 09/30/2006 10:30:20 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964

Shut down the stock exchanges...VULNERABLE people can lose thousands there.


95 posted on 09/30/2006 10:32:02 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

...sitting in front of your PC every waking hour for a week provides the same experience as a week's vacation in Las Vegas.




Oddly, both leave you in the same psychological and physical state...I can attest to this after more than 150 trips to Vegas for business.


96 posted on 09/30/2006 10:32:07 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
That's exactly right. It's not about the poor downtrodden addicts...it's about the tax dollars. If it was about helping the addicts...they would ban all the others aspects of gambling...state lottos....casinos...etc. They don't like this because they don't get taxes from it.

Hypocrites. How our alterboy can't see that is beyond me.

97 posted on 09/30/2006 10:32:29 AM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alterboy1964
VULNERABLE

As in, "Women and children... hardest hit."?????

98 posted on 09/30/2006 10:32:42 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. "--Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

As someone who plays Texas Hold'em and has not lost thousands, but has made thousands over the last 3 years on the Internet, this is ludicrous.

Maybe casino games are a form of gambling, but poker and sports betting is a skill.

Why doesn't Congress outlaw bingo in the church basement?

I know the Dems are out to lunch, but there seems to be still a large number of morons in the Republican Party who have no idea what the hell they're voting for.


99 posted on 09/30/2006 10:34:51 AM PDT by inottawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Just saying that if I were in congress, I'd support bills that either created jobs or kept jobs in the U.S. Flame me if you will, but that's my opinion on the situation.

Well it makes you a hypocrite. Because as a Republican Congressman, you're supposed to be in favor of the free market which weeds out inefficiencies and maximizes profits. That's what Internet gambling does for online casinos. Players also save tons of time which reduces opportunity costs more. I take it you're a RINO Congressman, hypothetically?

100 posted on 09/30/2006 10:36:22 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson