Posted on 09/30/2006 12:32:12 PM PDT by Prost1
A video report from CNN's Jack Cafferty says that buried deep within the pending plan to create military tribunals for those suspected of terrorism is amnesty for present U.S. officials.
He said that President Bush "is trying to pardon himself" with the plan, which is in the last stage of congressional endorsement and next will go to the president's desk. "Here's the deal:" Cafferty said. "Under the War Crimes Act, violations of the Geneva Conventions are felonies, in some cases punishable by death. When the Supreme Court ruled that the Geneva Convention applied to al-Qaida and Taliban detainees, President Bush and his boys were suddenly in big trouble.
"They've been working these prisoners over pretty good. In an effort to avoid possible prosecution they're trying to cram this bill through Congress before the end of the week before Congress adjourns," he said.
"The reason there's such a rush to do this? If the Democrats get control of the House in November this kind of legislation probably wouldn't pass," he said.
Cafferty said the "real disgrace" was that Sen. Bill Frist and U.S. Rep. Dennis Hastert "and their Republican stooges apparently don't see anything wrong with this. I really do wonder sometimes what we're becoming in this country."
The plan to authorize military tribunals came after a June ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court that said the White House's earlier parameters for putting those accused of terrorism on trial wouldn't be allowed.
That plan had held that those suspects could be put before military commissions the president would assemble.
The House approved the new plan 253-168. It would outline interrogation tactics and set up procedures for trials for a couple dozen suspects held at a military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Those include Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who's accused of planning the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The Senate voted 65-34 for the plan, and the remaining step was for the House to endorse Senate changes in the proposal.
Sen. John McCain, who was tortured as an enemy prisoner during the Vietnam War, said the nation owes it to its fighting soldiers to affirm the Geneva Conventions. He says this legislation ensures that.
President Bush said in a statement that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 would allow to continue "one of America's most potent tools in fighting the War on Terror."
A review of federal legislation actually shows that the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 provides that "it shall be a defense" for anyone in any civil or criminal action arising from the "detention and interrogation of aliens" suspected of terrorism simply that their actions were authorized and "determined to be lawful at the time."
A provision of the 2006 act allows that such a defense shall apply "to any aspect of the detention, treatment, or trial of any person detained at any time" since Sept. 11, 2001; and to any claim or cause of action from that.
A report in the Chicago Tribune summarized the bill as shielding U.S. officials from prosecution under the War Crimes Act retroactively to 1997. That's when the original law was passed criminalizing violations of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.
The Geneva convention says that these terrorists are not uniform soldiers and thus not entitled to protection.
Too bad this "reporter" can read the agreement. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court cannot rule on an international agreement, only on the Constitution.
The POTUS is Supreme in Foreign and Military matters.
This is proof positive that Cafferty and the rest of the left really DO want our president to be tried/hanged for "war crimes."
Traitors all. I think I want to throw up.
Just another Olbermann wannabe.
Cafferty is to be pitied.
He's just an old, old man who should be retired but looks like he forgot to contribute to his 401K
Yes, it is time for this senile , cantankerous, old coot to be put out to pasture.
Put him in the Members Only jacket and unleash him on the dog track.
OMG, I had an uncle, rest his soul, who fit that description perfectly.
:)
Just watching him and Blitzed french kiss each other is something to behold.
Any day now I expect CNN to add Herr Olberwomann to their stable of asses.
The President hasn't done anything to warrant a pardon.
Bingo!
But has anyone told the USSC?
Actually, the constitution says that all treaties are automatically part of the law of the land. This gives the SC ample power to interpret how treaties should be observed.
"Actually, the constitution says that all treaties are automatically part of the law of the land. This gives the SC ample power to interpret how treaties should be observed."
No, because the Supreme Court was chartered to rule only on the Constitution. I doubt this "law of the land" concept, because it would have been negotiated by the Exec Branch and approved by the Senate independent of the Supremes.
But, as to the exact reading of the Geneva convention and the opportunity to cancel the agreement....terrorists have no rights!
Anyone who says otherwise is provoking a Constitional Crisis because it is the Exec that is reponsible for Foreign Policy and War.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.