Again, for what? IMing a 16 year old which is the age of consent in DC.
Don't know and don't care if 16 is the age of consent in DC - this guy is a pervert. If he was trying to seduce a 13 year old boy in Thailand (where that is the age of consent), would that be okay with you?
"Again, for what? IMing a 16 year old which is the age of consent in DC."
Don't you suspect that perhaps these IMs are the tip of the iceberg?
As of today, we know about these IMs. Tomorrow, we may be hearing about actual sex/molestation (not cyber-sex), and perhaps even with a 15yo (or perhaps a 16yo in a different jurisdiction such as Florida, Virginia, or Maryland.)
I am just shocked at how many on FR jump to defend this perversion.
Okay, that is a SICK level of excuse for a pederast.
50 year old gay male IM's your 16 year old son. You gonna be "fine with it"?
Are you in any way giving any support for a reprobate 50+ year old that hits on 16 year old boys?
Actually, with your statement above you already answered my question. Pull your head out of your posterior, you science-fiction obsessed twit. Or just go get lost.
On this matter, "Republican" or no, no ground should be ceded. Actually, it is helpful, as we see those on this forum too twisted to understand simple wrong from right, evil from good. Thanks for your reply, I now see what camp you fall in.
What is the age of consent in LA?