Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

5 Weeks to the election! The GOP campaign will now begin in earnest, and the GOTV efforts will culminate in a 72 hour effort never before seen in a midterm election.

I still think when all is said and done VA, TN and MO are going to not be that close, and we win all three by comfortable margins (more than 5 points). Those three seats give us 51, and a majority.

I still see EVEN to -2 in the Senate as the most likely range, and +1 is posssible if we can pick off NJ and MD, and retain OH, PA, and MT.

Of the dark horse candidates-- Bouchard, McGavick and Kennedy-- I hope to see movement in their direction over the last 5 weeks. Due to the awful economy in Michigan, I give Bouchard the best chance of the three, and Kennedy (MN) and McGavick (WA) have closed the gap some.

I hope Chafee gets crushed, I can't believe we would spend a nickel to get him re-elected.

I had said I would move Florida into the Contests if Harris could get any momentum, but I don't think she has a chance. If I put her on the contests, it would be with a less than 5% chance. I hope to be proven wrong, and to have this pick be a permanent blot on my prediction record.

I was 2 for 2 in the Chafee/Laffey and Cardin/Mfume primary predictions. I hope I am wrong about Harris in the general.

1 posted on 10/01/2006 8:04:13 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: uscabjd; Kahuna; GOPsterinMA; george76; Russ; Don'tMessWithTexas; UNGN; ClaireSolt; ...

Senate 2006 Midterm ping.

If anyone wants on or off the Senate 2006 ping list, send me Freepmail.


2 posted on 10/01/2006 8:04:54 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

My sister lives in Michigan. She says people are turning against Stebenow in droves. That she hasn't found one sign for her in her community for her and there are hundreds for Bouchard.

Of course they still have to contend with the voter fraud in the Detroit area.


7 posted on 10/01/2006 8:12:25 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

According to Survey USA, Bill Nelson has a 42% approve / 39% disapprove. Of course this does not mean Katherine Harris is going to win. I suspect the drop in Nelson's approval ratings is due to him getting incredibly smug. Katherine should get 40% of the vote in the end. A major moral victory for her.

As Conrad Burns, regards of the MT race, we need to give Burns a good smack for giving us stressful nights over a Senate seat that shouldn't be in play to begin with.


12 posted on 10/01/2006 8:16:41 PM PDT by Kuksool (Design your Own Polls. Go Vote and Take a Few Others With You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

BUMP


14 posted on 10/01/2006 8:18:07 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

All your predictions make sense, but I think Allen in VA will barely survive if he does.


15 posted on 10/01/2006 8:19:52 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

According to SUSA, Chafee has an approval rating of 49. He's a toss-up or nearly so.



23 posted on 10/01/2006 8:26:02 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Good analysis. I'm not sure I'm quite so hopeful about Dewine and Burns keeping their seats, but I'll defer to the information you seem to have that indicates a better than 50-50 chance. I share your confidence that Steele could beat Cardin in Maryland though just by drawing enough of the black vote, or holding it down for the Democrats, to allow Steele to squeak by. Plus I believe Steele has about a 3 to 1 money advantage over Cardin.


28 posted on 10/01/2006 8:36:52 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

If you have a Senate race ping list, will you ad me to it? Thanks!


29 posted on 10/01/2006 8:37:53 PM PDT by MikeA (Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

A tidbit from a local city in MT : yesterday : one lone anti-war picketer(hard core dem)walking the street; today : 100 pro-lifers standing on all 4 corners of our main intersection. Burns is pro-life of course, tester is pro-death(like his terrorist friends). If that ratio holds, our man Conrad will win again. Also, lindeen, Denny Rehberg's dem opponent, is such a whacko that she'll pull tester's numbers down even further.


39 posted on 10/01/2006 8:52:58 PM PDT by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa; Clintonfatigued; AntiGuv; Torie
Might as well post my Senate ratings here. Since this is my first ratings edition, I feel that I should define my categories of vulnerability. I have no "Safe" categories as I don't like that term when talking about election races.

Therefore the "safest" categories are "Strong Democrat/Republican". These are races that the incumbent party has very little chance of losing (like under 5 percent).

Next come the "favored" categories. These candidates can range anywhere from having a solid 5 or 6 point average lead in the latest polling all the way up to a 15 to 20 point lead.

Finally there are the "tilt" categories. In the closest races this can be basically a "pick 'em" because the race is so close to even. However it can also apply in cases where one candidate has a narrow, within the MOE, lead in the polls.

STRONG GOP:

IN Lugar
ME Snowe
MS Lott
NV Ensign
TX Hutchinson
UT Hatch
WY Thomas

GOP FAVORED:

AZ Kyl (Kyl's lead in the polls is consistent despite the Democratic candidate spending gobs of his own money on ads. The only concern here is that, one: Kyl's lead is around 10-12 points and two: Janet Napolitano, the Democratic Governor, might have a bit of a coattail effect on downticket races given her high polling numbers.)

TILT GOP:

NJ Menendez (I predict this as our only pickup this year. Despite NJ's blue hue, voters there are disgusted with Corzine and the whole current corrupt regime. Kean has had a small but steady advantage in the polls for the last two months. Polling does tend to overestimate the GOP in NJ, but I think Menendez's current scandal will be enough to make him lose.)

MO Talent (The last three polls here have Talent down, but I'm not giving up. McCaskill lost her statewide race for Governor in 2004, so she's a polarizing figure. Talent's race in '02 was extremely close, but he pulled it out and Missouri is light red, hence the rating.)

VA Allen (The latest Mason-Dixon poll has a tie here with high undecideds. Survey USA has found Allen up 5 and then 6 points lately. I think Dems have been doing better here over the last few years, but the undecideds should go Allen in this redder state. If Webb starts to lead in the polls by even 2 or 3 points, though, I'll be very worried.)

TN Corker (This is the closest race in this category to being moved to "Tilt Dem". Corker has run a lackluster campaign. His numbers should have gone up after winning the primary; instead they've gone done. Tennessee voters aren't responding to the scandals surrounding Ford's family. Corker will be pretty lucky to win at this point.)

TILT DEM:

MD OPEN (Sarbanes) (It appears that Mfume's primary loss did indeed alienate some black voters, a huge group in Maryland. If Steele can win enough of them then Cardin is toast. One poll had Steele up one, and two others had Cardin up 7 and 11. In that case we have to conclude that the one that disagrees is probably off a bit so this stays Tilt Dem.)

MT Burns (I'm very close to making this "Dem Favored". Burns continues to languish in Montana. He's old and ineffective at refuting all the kinds of allegations against him. Plus the polls all agree that Tester is up almost completely outside the margin of error. Also Montanans have shown themselves willing to elect Dems (just look at Baucus all these years). Burns is running out of hope and hasn't closed the gap at all.)

OH DeWine (We've actually had some decent news in this race, mainly that the margin of the Dem's lead is shrinking. However DeWine has not led since June 20th in any poll and the last six polls from Ohio have found (from oldest to newest: DeWine -6, -1, -4, -10, -5, -2). If the election were today DeWine would lose.. and he's not going to get any help from the top of the ticket, where Blackwell will almost certainly lose by double digits.)

RI Chafee (I disagree with OP on this race.. Chafee has a MUCH better chance of winning than Burns or Santorum. He's down in the polls about the same amount as DeWine. Here, though, undecideds will probably break for the Dem.)

DEM FAVORED:

WA Cantwell (Cantwell's post-McGavick DUI-bounce disappeared, but she's still up almost double digits in a blue state. The only thing helping McGavick right now is that he can partially self-finance.)

MI Stabenow (This is almost a Strong Dem race now. The majority of polls right now, except Strategic Vision and Rasmussen, have Stabenow up double digits. The last two MI Senate polls have Stabenow up over 20 points. I don't think Bouchard can close that gap at this point.)

MN OPEN (Dayton) (Kennedy has never led here. The last four polls here have Klobuchar over 50 percent and Kennedy down between 8 and 24 points. Even disregarding the Star-Trib poll, Kennedy is still down double digits in 2 out of 3 polls)

PA Santorum (Santorum's late August bounce is gone now. He's down at least 10 now and despite his massive money advantage and the fact that he's a good campaigner, I don't see him coming back.)

STRONG DEM:

CA Feinstein
CT Lieberman
DE Carper
FL Nelson
HI Akaka
MA Kennedy
ND Conrad
NE Nelson
NM Bingaman
NY Clinton
VT Sanders
WI Kohl
WV Byrd

So the final verdict right now is that I see us losing a net of 3 seats. Minimum seats I see now are 47 minimum GOP, 40 minimum Dem. It would take something extraordinary for the GOP to have less than 48 or for the Dems to have less than 44. After that, we could get a maximum of 56. Dems can get a maximum of 52. (That assumes one party carries all the "Tilt" seats.)

The most likely Senate makeup I see is 52GOP/48DEM.

41 posted on 10/01/2006 8:59:20 PM PDT by okstate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

FL- D- Nelson safe
HI- D- Akaka safe
MA- D- Kennedy safe
NE- D- Nelson safe (sorry FL Freepers- prove me wrong!)

OK, we will, Rob! BTW, could you move that up a few lines? Thanks..............FRegards


53 posted on 10/01/2006 11:06:31 PM PDT by gonzo (.........Good grief!...I'm as confused as a baby in a topless club!.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
There are three safe Dem seats in deep red states (ND, WV, and NB), and one GOP loss in a deep blue state (and, as you say, good riddance!).

There are currently 11 Democrat senators from deep red states (Bush >54% 00/04), and three, soon to be 2, Republicans from deep blue states.

Until the GOP starts contesting these seats, any GOP majority will be small, and always endangered.

55 posted on 10/02/2006 4:27:20 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Who you gonna call?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
So far, you'r right about Harris, however I have heard she is starting to move.

A little on the ground stuff from Mont. Co., OH---which is THE swing county in OH:

more Blackwell signs than Strickland signs by a FOUR-TO-ONE ratio. This is odd because in 2004, Bush wasn't doing this well in the "yard sign" race.

We have walkers out five days a week, two shifts. Callers going every night.

The GOP effort, esp. at governor, was late in starting, but I get the sense that it's really rollin' now.

60 posted on 10/02/2006 5:54:01 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: uscabjd; Kahuna; GOPsterinMA; george76; Russ; Don'tMessWithTexas; UNGN; ClaireSolt; ...

As of October 13, here's my opinions on the races:

The SENATE "CONTESTS" (Ranked most likely GOP to least)
[Note: We have 48 seats besides these 12 that are either not up for reelection or they are not close enough to be in play.]

VA- R seat- ALLEN vs. Webb (80%)
TN- R seat- Corker vs. Ford (60%)
MO- R seat- TALENT vs. McCaskill (60%)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^Needed to Keep 51 seat GOP control ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(Note: need two of three for 50-50 Cheney majority, but this entails power-sharing in cmtes, etc)

OH- R seat- DEWINE vs. Brown (55%)
NJ- D seat- Kean vs. MENENDEZ (50%)
MT- R seat- BURNS vs. Tester (50%)
RI- R seat- CHAFEE vs. Whitehouse (45%)
^^^^^^^^^^^^ Needed to Maintain 55-45 GOP (status quo ratio) ^^^^^^^^^^^^

MD- D seat- Steele vs. Cardin (45%)
PA- R seat- SANTORUM vs. Casey (45%)
WA- D seat- McGavick vs. CANTWELL (35%)
MI- D seat- Bouchard vs. STABENOW (30%)
MN- D seat- Kennedy vs. Klobuchar* (25%)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^Needed to Attain 60 seat majority ^^^^^^^^^^^

My bottom line is I still see even to -2 seats as the most likely outcome, and do not see us losing the majority barring unforseen events. Most unforseen events would actually favor the GOP at this point.


74 posted on 10/13/2006 12:38:49 PM PDT by RobFromGa (Monthly donors rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Exactly how does Lieberman fit in? If he is seated as an Independent, does his seat count to the Dem majority, or hopefully minority, in terms of committee assignments etc?


88 posted on 10/13/2006 2:04:58 PM PDT by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO WANT TO TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Bump for reference.


92 posted on 10/13/2006 4:20:39 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

NJ- D seat- Kean vs. MENENDEZ (60%)

This is a chance for us?


98 posted on 10/14/2006 6:37:40 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Thank you again Jimmy Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

http://www.nypost.com/seven/10242006/postopinion/opedcolumnists/06_elex__back_to_toss_up_opedcolumnists_dick_morris__eileen_mc_gann.htm

from www.electionprojection.com

One of two articles.


123 posted on 10/24/2006 5:00:07 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Tá brón orainn. Níl Spáinnis againn anseo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
Thanks for the ping, Rob, I always read your predictions with interest.

Remember, Pubbies (learn from the Dims) Vote early and vote often! :)

132 posted on 10/24/2006 5:10:13 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

..Allen has been getting hammered, not because of 2006, but because of 2008--they are afraid of him...


173 posted on 10/25/2006 11:07:17 AM PDT by WalterSkinner ( ..when there is any conflict between God and Caesar -- guess who loses?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson