Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moose2004

Keeping the Senate in GOP control is more important that keeping the House. Why? Because I believe the Prez will have the opportunity to appoint, at least, one more Supreme Court Justice before he leaves office in two years and it's the Senate that does the "confirmation thing".


14 posted on 10/02/2006 6:05:12 AM PDT by no dems (I'll take a moral Mormon over a demonic Democrat or repugnant RINO anyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: no dems

Great point. Ginsberg and Stevens might retire. the only problem is the House is much tougher to get back. It only took us 40 years to get it back last time


17 posted on 10/02/2006 6:28:35 AM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
Keeping the Senate in GOP control is more important that keeping the House.

If Dems take the House, impeachment is right around the corner.

I think that will tick off the public, but the lib base will demand it.

19 posted on 10/02/2006 6:34:33 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: no dems
yes but doesn't the house issue articles of impeachment? if the house ends up in dem hands you can bet they'll tie down bush for the rest of his term fighting bogus impeachment hearings.

Bottom line: GOP better hold both senate and house.

25 posted on 10/02/2006 8:59:47 AM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson