Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Compound Eyes, Evolutionary Ties
University of California, San Diego ^ | 02 October 2006 | Kim McDonald

Posted on 10/03/2006 7:19:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Biologists at the University of California, San Diego have discovered that the presence of a key protein in the compound eyes of the fruit fly (which glow at center due to a fluorescent protein) allows the formation of distinct light gathering units in each of its 800 unit eyes, an evolutionary change to an “open system” that enabled insects to make significant improvements in visual acuity and angular sensitivity. In contrast, beetles (shown surrounding the fruit fly), bees and many mosquito species have the light-gathering units fused together into a “closed system.”

In a paper published in this week's early online edition of the journal Nature, the scientists report that one of three proteins needed to form these light gathering units is present in the visual system of fruit flies, house flies and other insects with open eye systems, but conspicuously absent in beetles, bees and other species with closed systems. The researchers showed that the loss of this protein, called “spacemaker,” can convert the eyes of fruitflies — which normally have open eye systems — into a closed one. In contrast, the introduction of spacemaker into eyes with a closed system transformed them into an open one.

Pic too big to post here.

Charles Darwin was so enamored by the intricate complexity of the eye that he wondered how it could have evolved. “These results help illustrate the beauty and power of evolution and show how ‘little steps’—like the presence of a single structural protein—can so spectacularly account for major changes in form and function,” said Charles Zuker, a professor of biology and neurosciences at UCSD and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, who headed the research team.

Andrew Zelhof, a postdoctoral researcher working in Zuker's laboratory, was the first author of the study, which also involved Robert Hardy and Ann Becker of UCSD. The research was supported by the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bstoobigtoposthere; crevolist; govtgrants; junkprofs; keywordspam; loser; nicetry; pathenrylosesagain; tenuredidiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last
Everybody be nice.
1 posted on 10/03/2006 7:19:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 390 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 10/03/2006 7:21:03 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

From my observation, two have stop lights and two have go lights. So now we have traffic control.


3 posted on 10/03/2006 7:24:59 AM PDT by azhenfud (an enigma between two parentheses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Help for new visitors to the evolution debate
Another service of Darwin Central, the conspiracy that cares.

If you're interested in learning about evolution, visit The List-O-Links.
If you'd like to understand the concept of speciation, visit Micro-evolution, Macro-evolution, and Speciation.
If you're serious about debating this issue, see How to argue against a scientific theory.

4 posted on 10/03/2006 7:25:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

More evidence of evolution.

Darwin: 17,823,592
God: 0


5 posted on 10/03/2006 7:25:38 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

I do not believe it possible to derive a score for God. It can be stated that the score for creationists is 0, but I have yet to see demonstrated that -- despite their assertions -- they actually speak on behalf of any real deities.


6 posted on 10/03/2006 7:27:58 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Darwin: 17,823,592
God: 0

Only if you consider the two to be mutually exclusive. : )

This is a great article, in any case.

7 posted on 10/03/2006 7:28:07 AM PDT by Quark2005 ("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
an evolutionary change to an “open system” that enabled insects to make significant improvements in visual acuity and angular sensitivity

Or it was just made that way.

"Discovering" the way something currently is has nothing to do with proof that it changed by itself.

8 posted on 10/03/2006 7:31:06 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

YEC INTREP


9 posted on 10/03/2006 7:33:38 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
More evidence of evolution.

Darwin: 17,823,592
God: Creationists/ID: 0

Also that number for Darwin seems just a little low.

10 posted on 10/03/2006 7:35:10 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
How Could An Eye Evolve? An issue frequently raised by creationists.
11 posted on 10/03/2006 7:36:41 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
Darwin: 17,823,592
God: Creationists/ID: 0

Also that number for Darwin seems just a little low.

Because every similarity between any two creatures "proves" Darwin. Interesting point system.

12 posted on 10/03/2006 7:39:05 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Because every similarity between any two creatures "proves" Darwin.

You are misrepresenting the evidence for evolution in your attempt at sarcasm.
13 posted on 10/03/2006 7:41:13 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

subtraction of an exsisting protien yeilding "closed" not too impressive (hardly address gain of information on demostrates a loss of information), far more impressive would have been to show beetles eyes could gain this protein and become "open"


14 posted on 10/03/2006 7:47:37 AM PDT by flevit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
The bogus quotes about eye evolution are sure to arise in this thread, so I'm going to cut them off at the pass.

Darwin saying: “To suppose that the eye...". See post 7.

Darwin's letter to Asa Gray" “The eye to this day gives me a cold shudder.”. See post 14.

15 posted on 10/03/2006 7:48:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Because every similarity between any two creatures "proves" Darwin.

No, this similarity makes a prediction about the biogeographical distribution of species, the temporal an geographical locations of specific fossils, and the location of particular artifacts in disparate genomes which can be (and have been) verified in later finds.

What specific predictions does the creationist 'model' make?

16 posted on 10/03/2006 7:50:06 AM PDT by Quark2005 ("Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs." -Matthew 7:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Check what I responded to before accusing me of sarcasm.
17 posted on 10/03/2006 8:11:02 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
What specific predictions does the creationist 'model' make?

What kind of prediction does Creation need to make?

Creation predicts that the human condition will devolve. Have you noticed how many people around you are fat, ugly, wear glasses, are in wheelchairs, can't reproduce, have heart desease, have extreme allergies, etc etc etc. There is a prediction that creation makes that you see coming true all around you.

18 posted on 10/03/2006 8:14:02 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DungeonMaster
Check what I responded to before accusing me of sarcasm.

You are incorrectly assuming that I did not consider the full context of your statement. You are incorrect. Your response is no less a strawman based upon the context.
19 posted on 10/03/2006 8:17:25 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
What specific predictions does the creationist 'model' make?

The Five Failed Predictions of Creationism

20 posted on 10/03/2006 8:18:33 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-263 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson