Skip to comments.
Bernanke: Baby Boomers Will Strain U.S. (the sky is blue alert)
AP ^
Posted on 10/04/2006 10:47:36 AM PDT by SDGOP
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Ay caramba
1
posted on
10/04/2006 10:47:37 AM PDT
by
SDGOP
To: SDGOP
Ah that is a misquote. He said they would stain US. Guess no one told him about Bill Clinton.
2
posted on
10/04/2006 10:49:52 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
To: SDGOP
You have a problem with what he said?
3
posted on
10/04/2006 10:50:34 AM PDT
by
Jedidah
To: SDGOP
Should read.... Illegal immigration threatens retirements of baby boomers.
4
posted on
10/04/2006 10:50:40 AM PDT
by
fourmation599
(Infidel is in the eye of the beholder)
To: SDGOP
As the population ages, the nation will have to choose among higher taxes, less non-entitlement spending by the government, a reduction in spending on entitlement programs, a sharply higher budget deficit or some combination thereof, Bernanke said. Meanwhile our political leaders stick their fingers in their ears and say "la-la-la-la-la-I'm not listening-la-la-la-la-la".
5
posted on
10/04/2006 10:51:07 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Dems - Your conduct is an invitation to the enemy, yet few of you have heart enough to join them.)
To: Jedidah
No, i have no problem with what he said. My problem is all these baby boomers who didnt plan for retirement and are goin to screw my generation over by demanding we pay for theirs.
6
posted on
10/04/2006 10:52:14 AM PDT
by
SDGOP
To: SDGOP
If history is any indicator, no they won't.
Too many Boomers sucking on social services will cause the cessation of social services, just like in The Wiemar Republic. Hopefully without a dictatorship, but the abandonment of large elderly populations with little intimate connection to the younger generations is not a new happenstance, and the consequences are not going to be something new either.
7
posted on
10/04/2006 10:53:29 AM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Always look on the bright side of life.)
To: SDGOP
I have a feeling, horrible as it is, that the cries for euthanasia will be increased because of this.
<.sarcasm>What better way to care for the old then by removing all their burdens?</.sarcasm>
8
posted on
10/04/2006 10:55:41 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: SDGOP
Finally, this man opens his mouth and something other than unadulterated and destructive bullshit comes out. "Baby boomers" are a red herring, they aren't the problem. Haven't they been paying into these socialist programs for half a century now? Where's their money? The problem isn't the baby boomers, it's the programs themselves. They're set up and operate in the same way that a chain letter is set up and operates. They're unsustainable.
9
posted on
10/04/2006 10:57:38 AM PDT
by
Jaysun
(Idiot Muslims. They're just dying to have sex orgies.)
To: SDGOP
The President tried to talk about this, the Whining Baby Boomers said no.
Have the Whining Baby Boomers ever been told no?
To: SDGOP
11
posted on
10/04/2006 10:59:23 AM PDT
by
groanup
(The FairTax has no payment deadline for the tax payer - ever.)
To: SDGOP
As the population ages, the nation will have to choose among higher taxes, less non-entitlement spending by the government, a reduction in spending on entitlement programs, a sharply higher budget deficit or some combination thereof, Bernanke said.
I vote for option three.
To: SDGOP
I planned for retirement, but it included social security and medicare. After all, I paid into those all my working life. I wouldn't starve without them, unless I got a serious illness, in which case my savings would get eaten up pretty quickly.
We need to find a way to phase things our gracefully, so that we don't get screwed too bad and you don't get screwed too bad. The problem is that those things were publicly financed instead of private.
I understand your self-interest, but I'm sure you don't want to cut out medicare and have your parents wind up in the poor house because of unexpected medical bills wiping out their savings. After all, when they paid their taxes for that, they thought it was like insurance.
What do you suggest?
13
posted on
10/04/2006 11:03:19 AM PDT
by
Kenton
To: Spirochete
Berneke left out the most obvious option.... and one that should be added.
START BRINGING IN ILLEGALS BY THE TRAINLOADS AND THEY WILL PAY THE
BENEFITS OF RETIRING BABYBOOMERS. (SAC OFF)
To: SDGOP
"My problem is all these baby boomers who didnt plan for retirement and are goin to screw my generation over by demanding we pay for theirs."
Why don't you PROVE that baby boomers "didn't plan for retirement" to a greater extent than other generations?
Baby boomers, who have paid for earlier generations' retirements all their working lives, don't whine like you do.
To: Kenton
For one thing, give benefits to people on it now, and drastically cut benefits for people who won't be collecting it for some time. This way thep eople who are on it now aren't screwed, and people decades down the line will have no choice but to come up with a way to take care of themselves.
16
posted on
10/04/2006 11:06:44 AM PDT
by
SDGOP
To: groanup
Can no person say....PONZI SCHEME?
17
posted on
10/04/2006 11:06:56 AM PDT
by
litehaus
(A memory tooooo long)
To: SDGOP
"No, i have no problem with what he said. My problem is all these baby boomers who didnt plan for retirement and are goin to screw my generation over by demanding we pay for theirs."May I amend your statement?
No, I have no problem with what he said. My problem is all these baby boomers who didn't plan for retirement and are goin to screw my generation, AND THE BABY BOOMERS WHO DID PLAN FOR RETIREMENT, over by demanding we pay for theirs.
To: SDGOP
As the population ages, the nation will have to choose among higher taxes, less non-entitlement spending by the government a reduction in spending on entitlement programs, , a sharply higher budget deficit or some combination thereof, Bernanke said. I pick the highlighted item.
To: truth_seeker
You forget, that you baby boomers who paid all your life paid MUCH LOWER rates. Today tax rates are high, and they will get higher. There's a big difference there. If you want proof baby boomers didn't plan for retirement, only 1/4th of people over the age of 50 have savings of 250k+, 1/3rd have nothing, the rest have a median of around 10k or so i think. That sounds like a lot of planning if you ask me.
Make no mistake, if something isn't done to solve this problem quickly there will be a massive young vs old crisis in our society. Young people just aren't going to tolerate tax rates in the 60's and 70's to bankroll people just sitting around for 30 or 40 years.
20
posted on
10/04/2006 11:09:06 AM PDT
by
SDGOP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-154 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson