Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meet Jordan Edmund One Mark Foley Instant Messanger
Passionate America ^ | 10/4/06 | Wild Bill

Posted on 10/04/2006 1:58:14 PM PDT by Gribbit

Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag! Mark Foley is a scumbag!

Now that that is out of the way I will reveal how I (and a few others) discovered Jordan Edmund was one of the former house pages that participated in sexually explicit instant messages with Rep. Mark Foley. Also I will explain to you why I believe it necessary to reveal Jordan Edmund's identity. You may not agree with my decision, but I hope to explain my reasoning by the end of this story.

Read More HERE!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Conspiracy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200302; 200304; blackmail; edmund; ernestistook; foley; foleygate; istook; jordanaedmund; jordanedmund; lolakana223; loraditch; markfoley; matthewloraditch; mattloraditch; messages; page; pageis21now; phigammadelta; traitor; ucberkeley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-540 next last
To: Alter Kaker

Nobody forced him to talk to Foley; he could have blocked him.

What Foley did was wrong, and may have been illegal. He should go to jail.

But, this boy is not all innocent, either.


181 posted on 10/04/2006 5:28:19 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Once this hits I don't think they will in denial any more, since they can demonstrate they were deliberately set up by a media lie (that the IMs were evidence that Foley was hitting on underage pages and that the Republicans must have known about it).

The Republicans have said they didn't have any evidence prior to this that Foley was actually doing anything. They may be vindicated, especially if it turns out the "underage page" is actually a political operative tied to Soros or the Dems.

Now it's back to the media outing a gay man. Politically incorrect, you know, for the sensitive inclusive Dems.


182 posted on 10/04/2006 5:28:26 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

"but an "outing" like this would not be the end of the world if people found out he was conversing with me. I somehow doubt it will be the end of his world."

I'm glad there are people like you out there who know how to think of the glass as half full..

"He is on a Republican campaign staff, and he needs to be fired tomorrow"

Yes, suddenly being seen as a liability to present and future employers for no reason isn't the end of the world at all..


183 posted on 10/04/2006 5:28:51 PM PDT by ivyleaguebrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Gribbit
Instant Messanger

What is a messanger? That isn't a word in English.

184 posted on 10/04/2006 5:29:53 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

(LOL, let's see if it was Ross who set up the bogus blog!)


185 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:23 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Sarah

We knew about the fake blog, days ago. I haven't seen any information about the kid turning over the IMs years ago. The only claim of having made a report, years ago was by Kirk Fordham, the former staffer for Foley. His word is extremely doubtful, since he is also gay and was being pressured by the same rabid gay activists that set up the fake blog.


186 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:24 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Paine's Ghost

If he is a real Republican, he will come forward soon.

If he is not, he will stay silent and should be forever blacklisted from ever working again.


187 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:28 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat; All
Where are you guys getting this "bombshell" that he was 18 when the IMs happened? In one of them he says "im not 18 till feb 23."

Now, are we sure this particular IM is from this Jordan guy?

It's my understanding that there are multiple IM recipients and logs out there now.

188 posted on 10/04/2006 5:30:36 PM PDT by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot; tirednvirginia
Usually O'Reilly is not Live. Usually recorded in late afternoon.

Correct, O'Reilly is probably taped at around 4 or 5 PM Eastern time.

There are many instances where breaking news has occured between 5 and 8 PM Eastern time and O'Reilly's show doesn't mention that breaking news.

It's probably in his contract that the show is taped in the late afternoon so he can have a 9-5 job.

189 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:02 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Sarah

AOL DOES allow something called "recording" of IM's.

I thought that Blog post said something about IM's going to cell phones.

Point is, some way, somehow, those IM's were saved. The cell phone thing is one way. A copy and paste well hey, I can sit and type all kinds of things in Word and it's just that....me typing fiction. I can call them IM's but that doesn't mean it's so.

Someone went out of their way to save a verifiable record of those IM's.


190 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:12 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
"then again, Ive heard in legend of Barney Frank (who definitely makes my favorite politicians list, btw) holding up a list, McCarthy-style, of prominent closeted gay repubs, so you never know"

I sure wish I could get to that site and read all of it. That was an interesting statement they made.
191 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:20 PM PDT by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
He was 16 when he was a page, but apparently not when the IM's took place. Haven't heard that in the media though. Shocker.

Palmer is denying a meeting between him and Fordham. Somebody is lying. Foley and Fordham were being threatened by this Rogers guy.

192 posted on 10/04/2006 5:31:32 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Paine's Ghost

He is a scumbag and I can say that with authority after the dirty tricks he pulled in the Governor's primary.


193 posted on 10/04/2006 5:32:13 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( Go Sooners! George Allen for President in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I am intrigued by your assertions.

Could you enlighten us?


194 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:11 PM PDT by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Wow, I'm totally lost.
What would gay activists have to gain by this scandal?


195 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:11 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat

The IM's were dated April ...2 months AFTER Feb B-day.


196 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:14 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Sarah

No, but he should have reported it EARLIER.

This damn fool decided to wait until it would hurt his party the most.

We may lose the whole Congress because of this.


197 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:19 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

And another thing, if this guy is a "real Republican" why the vitriol by the DUmmies against this blog when this blog came up with the inofrmation.


198 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:27 PM PDT by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Sarah
I'm tired, it's 2:15 am where I live... It's deduced from his birthday and the dates of the IMs

Thanks Sarah,
I deal with clients all day that sound like some of these posters so I just couldn't bring myself to answer them either. Good night.

199 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:42 PM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

OK, I get it now (after going back and reading ALL the posts).

This is NOT the Louisiana boy whose parents filed a complaint against Foley.

This is a person, presumably a mole or a turncoat within the Republican Party, who carried on filthy conversations with Foley by IM. He was NOT a page at the time and was of age. He kept the IM's for blackmail purposes. How many other politicos did he do this with?

Regardless, Foley is a homo punk and deserved to be outed and forced to resign.

Now let's get all the other rotten immoral people in Congress. (Eyes rolling...that would be a lifelong endeavor).


200 posted on 10/04/2006 5:33:55 PM PDT by Palladin (Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 521-540 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson