Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Red Alert for N(uke) Test" [Hint: MORE Important Than Foley]
Herald Sun, Australia (2 hours ago) ^ | 6 October 2006 | Herald Sun, Australia (2 hours ago)

Posted on 10/06/2006 10:24:04 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo

TOKYO - Japan is ready for North Korea to carry out its threatened nuclear test as soon as this weekend, officials said yesterday. Japanese Vice-Foreign Minister Shotaro Yachi, on a visit to Washington, said Pyongyang's resolve to test its first atom bomb should not be underestimated.

"We discussed the possibility that the test would occur this weekend," Mr Yachi said after talks with US Deputy National Security Adviser Jack Crouch. North Korea issued a statement on Tuesday saying it would test a nuclear bomb, dramatically raising the stakes in its standoff with the US on its quest for atomic weapons. "They will probably go ahead and do it as they had that tone in their declaration," Mr Yachi said.

"It possibly means they are already very prepared." North Korean leader Kim Jong Il reportedly gathered top military commanders for a rally yesterday, urging them to bolster defences.

Attendees responded with cheers of hurrah and chanted slogans such as, "Let's fight at the cost of our lives for the respected Supreme Commander comrade Kim Jong Il". Tomorrow is the anniversary of Kim Jong Il's appointment as head of the Korean Workers' Party in 1997. In Tokyo, the Government said it was ready for a test by the arch-rival communist state. "We are making preparations keeping any possible scenario in mind," chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki said. Japan would know immediately if there was a test, he said. Japan's new Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said he would try to find common ground with his counterparts from China and South Korea when he saw them on his first foreign trip, which starts tomorrow. "We need to send messages together to stop the north before they make such a reckless action," Mr Abe said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axis; dprk; focus; gilju; important; kilchu; kilju; kimjongil; nkorea; northkorea; nuclear; nukes; pyongyang; rok; test; underground; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

placemark


81 posted on 10/06/2006 12:03:33 PM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Correct ....but you have to balance the reaction to the fact they can take out Seoul in minutes and kill millions.

Oh, pshaw. It's not like they're our casualties.... (/keyboard kommando)

82 posted on 10/06/2006 12:14:35 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: webheart

ROFL! I was thinking the same thing!! QUITE a "voluntary chant" from the peanut gallery!


83 posted on 10/06/2006 12:24:20 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator
Radiation is so over rated, I don't see people in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, dropping like flys.

Didn't a lot of actors filming westerns in the area of the desert test sites later all get cancer and die prematurely? Bonanza actors, etc?

84 posted on 10/06/2006 12:27:38 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator
Don't get me wrong, I don't want the NK's to have a nuke, but a test is not a war or an attack.

That's pretty much the same rationale used to excuse Germany's rearmament prior to WWII.

85 posted on 10/06/2006 12:49:44 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator

Radiation is so over rated, I don't see people in Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, dropping like flys

Not so fast on the overrated. It has always been my contention that John Holmes was born and raised near one of those locations.


86 posted on 10/06/2006 12:54:17 PM PDT by jblair (Son of a Wild Weasel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc
how long it takes Japan

It will take longer for Parliament to decide to build nukes than it will to build nukes.

87 posted on 10/06/2006 12:56:38 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Bitsy
Additionally, anything that can be brought up that infers this is the result of the Bush Administration, then that angle will be played. For the libs, this will be their response, rather than getting behind the President, Japan and the civilized world.

Actually, that's pretty much what the pre-scripted Democrat talking points look like: 1)President Bush calling NK part of the "axis of evil" caused them to restart their nuke program. 2) President Bush should have held the two party talks Kim Jong Il wanted. 3) President Bush could have negotiated a NK "nuclear freeze" like the brilliant agreement Jimmy Carter and Maddy Albright got for BJ Clinton.

Sadly, too many people will buy into this if the President fails to get right out in front with a program of military and/or economic measures to pressure the NKs. Personally, I think that the other 5 members of the six power talks have some economic surprises in for KJI, if he pulls his nuke smoke wagon.

88 posted on 10/06/2006 1:07:09 PM PDT by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator

Tell that to Chernobyl-ites and hibakusha in Hiro and Naga.


89 posted on 10/06/2006 1:29:17 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: 6ppc
What the heck.

I'm in.

I'll put down 10 October 2006 local time in Korea (within that 24 hour time frame).

90 posted on 10/06/2006 1:31:18 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
What? You think the dumbocrat voters know this?
91 posted on 10/06/2006 7:36:13 PM PDT by GregoryFul (cheap, immigrant labor built America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator

But NK took lots of considerations from the US for their pledge to not pursue nuclear bomb ambitions (Clinton's treaty). So what now - they renege on their pledge, and the US does squat? What do you think, scrub?


92 posted on 10/06/2006 7:44:31 PM PDT by GregoryFul (cheap, immigrant labor built America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

My fearless prediction: (remember you heard it here, first)

li'l Kim lights a nuke. He and the Bush admin will let loose with enough bluster to make all the jihadis in Mohammadom green with envy. Kim will go MIA for a few months, Americans maintain status quo and wait for the next sex scandal to pop up.


93 posted on 10/06/2006 8:00:20 PM PDT by Nachoman (There is nothing so good in this world that it can't become an unhealthy obsession.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This ought to "blow Foleygate" off the front pages.

Foley Gate is about to be dropped by the MSM like a Hot Nuclear Potato. In a nut shell - The mother of a gay page working for Pelosi was writing a book on pages. The book writer was in contact with Foleys pages. There was also a TV show in the works. The pages were trolling for book and movie worthy encounters. The Democrats will be looking for their next October Surprise this weekend or early next week. Looks like North Korea will supply the template for the next in their series of surprises. The Democrats probably already have their speeches and sound bites written for how Bush et. al. caused this North Korea mess.

We know what Japan will do. Will South Korea go nuclear in response ?

94 posted on 10/06/2006 8:08:29 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
But NK took lots of considerations from the US

Yes considerations we should never have given. This is all water under the bridge, Now What? Nuke North Korea, fallout from our weapons spreads around the world, all because NK tested one of their own nukes. I still don't see what the test will prove. Let Lil Kim jump up and down, stamp his feet, throw a Nuclear tantrum on his own country,it will be just one less nuke he has to use in the future.

I don't want NK to have any nukes, but they do and a test still will not bring about all out war.

95 posted on 10/06/2006 8:28:46 PM PDT by The Turbanator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: The Turbanator
Your policy would open the floodgates for all tinpots to get the bomb (how about a nuclear Cuba). There would be no nonproliferation treaty, no controlling legal authority would exist. Lots of people around the world, not too long ago, thought that spreading nukes around the world would be a very bad thing - and would inevitably lead to widespread nuclear conflict. This seems a reasonable projection to me. So before the problem gets really big, some nation or group of nations has to manage it.

In the case of NK, we've tried diplomacy, bribery, threats, etc., apparently to no avail with this rogue nation - the rest of the world watches to see if we indeed are just a paper tiger.

96 posted on 10/07/2006 4:52:51 PM PDT by GregoryFul (cheap, immigrant labor built America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson