[inpajamas]

HERE ALSO

Christian leaders facing Soros-funded 'witch hunt'

[BipolarBob]

I thought libs were AGAINST profiling. Or is this one of those "I was aginst profiling before I was FOR profiling" Kerry stances?

[frogjerk]

The Devil is persistent.

[trisham]

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

***********

It's almost funny.

[headstamp]

I could imagine them inquiring about any other "group". The liberal howling would be deafening.

[rhombus]

Christianaphobia? They have to do better than that. People can't evem pronounce it.

[Nathan Zachary]

How about a list of gays and lesbians, pinko's and muslims Soros?
Better yet, step out in front of a fast moving bus.

[100-Fold_Return]

Link's no-workie.

As long as Buffett, Soros, T. Boone Pickens and their lapdogs keep panting after Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson as some sort of Christian leaders--the actual leaders in getting the Gospel throughout the world are barnstorming away.

[hope those demons don't read this, LOL!]

[TeleStraightShooter]

LOL...from the CREW that refuses full discloser to FBI on it harboring Foley's eMails {& IMs?} since 2005.

[FlingWingFlyer]

It's becoming more and more obvious that the "We Gotta Get Religion" gig didn't work out for the Commies down at the DNC. Apparently, the 'RATS have decided that it would be easier for them to just destroy Christians than for DemocRATS to pretend to be Christians in order to get the religious vote.

[Mo1]

fyi ping

[Beagle8U]

Soros and CREW wont keep Christians out of the White House, but they will likely get them out of the RAT party!

[sgtbono2002]

How many iof these anti-American groups like Move-On and Crew dos george Soros sup[port.

Since we know Soros doesnt put out money unless he makes double back. What is he up to in his efforts to destroy America with these insane liberals.

[savedbygrace]

Here's something singularly interesting. CREW's Business Manager is listed as Mayanna Prak, and the CREW website says she "assisted an ambassador in the operation of a foreign embassy", but they don't ID the embassy. Google turns it up - Cambodia.

Can't find much else on her.

[RobRoy]

Interesting. I have never heard of CREW until yesterday, but they are now in the middle of two big and unrelated stories, both breaking in the same couple of days.

Looks like they are the "October surprise" machine this time around.

[Doctor Raoul]

Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho, CREW bigots have got to go.

[Jack Black]

I think an appropriate response would be: "We don't interrogate visitors to the white house about their religious beliefs. We talk to believers in all faiths as a normal part of "doing the work of the American people". Thus it is not possible for us to comply with this request.

The following individuals are from organizations that have the terms "Christian, Christ, Jesus" in their names.

[mtntop3]

CREW and similar groups have similarities with Islamic terrorists. Here they aim at conservative Christians.

It would be salutary if CREW would kindly provide a record of all ITS contacts. Remember, this is supposed to be a non-partisan organization for tax purposes.

[ironmaidenPR2717]

WND has an opinion poll on this. Personally, I think ALL visitors to ALL administrations should be public knowledge. This sword oughta cut both ways. Besides, Christians should have nothing to fear if it shows they visited the Whitehouse - on the other hand, those who visit any 'rat administration SHOULD fear exposure.

[gidget7]

"These are people that are publicly identifiable as leaders of what I would call the Christian right, and we are interested to know the extent of influence that they may have had on the president and his policies," Anne Weismann, chief counsel for CREW, told Cybercast News Service. "



Uhhhhh how bout the Christian groups ask the same of CREW and Moveon.org, make them release all their information on how much influence they have/had on Democratic leadership. While they are at it ask, how much money they paid Democratic leadership to get their leftist agendas passed.

Who is crew to ask anything of the secret service?? They're a bunch of conniving (to be kind) leftist wackos!

[piasa]

Speaking of Anne Weismann of CREW [and CREW of deFoleyation and Nigerflap fame]... doesn't this look like advance preparation for the historical revisionists' wet dream, the arrival of Sandy Berger ?

<snip>

1 Oral Arguments in Electronic Records Court Case -- On June 27, Judge Paul Friedman of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard oral arguments in the case of Public Citizens v. John Carlin, U.S. Archivist -- Case Number 1:96 CV02840. The American Library Association, the National Security Archive, the American Historical Association, the Organization of American Historians, as well as individual researchers are co-plaintiffs in this case. Michael Tankersley, accompanied by Alan Morrison, presented the case for the plaintiffs and Anne Weismann, accompanied by Jason Baron, presented the government's case. The suit challenges the Archivist's promulgation of a "General Records Schedule" authorizing all federal agencies, at their discretion, to destroy the only electronic version of Federal agency records stored on agency electronic mail and word processing systems provided the agency has printed a hard copy of the electronic record on paper of microform. The complaint states that the Archivist has "improperly ignored the unique value of electronic records" and "has abdicated his statutory responsibility to appraise the historical value of such electronic records."

The government rooted its defense in the argument of content versus form, stressing that while the electronic record is not being preserved the content is being preserved in paper form. Additionally, the government's position rested on the assertion that some agencies are not as technologically sophisticated as others and preservation of content in paper format is what is realistic and that saving all electronic mail would clog the system. Judge Friedman interrupted with frequent questions: Would it be all right to destroy all memorandum, regardless of format? How could a plaintiff file an FOIA for electronic material if it has been destroyed? Hasn't the Archivist given a blanket authorization to agencies? Most corporations have record keeping policies that specify specific time periods, and if not this is suspect, why not the same for the government? If the U.S. Archivist doesn't know what electronic records are being destroyed by agencies, is he fulfilling his role as gatekeeper on preservation of federal records? Why does the government have to have one government wide plan, why couldn't it have different plans for agencies that are more technologically advanced?...</snip>

------- NCC Washington Update 3:26, 6/30/97
http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byform/mailing-lists/exlibris/1997/06/msg00223.html