Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weekend Show *Preview* for 10/7 - 10/8/06 (not the live thread)
Network and Cable News Networks | 10/6/05 | Network and Cable News

Posted on 10/06/2006 5:32:15 PM PDT by Phsstpok

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Saturday Shows for 10-7-06

Below are the topics and guests announced for these programs, along with my take on the "memes" that the shows are trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.

The Beltway Boys (Mort Kondracke, Fred Barnes)

CNBC's Tim Russert Show (Tim Russert)

Fox News Watch (Eric Burns)

Journal Editorial Report (Paul Gigot) - FNC show page


1 posted on 10/06/2006 5:32:18 PM PDT by Phsstpok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
NBC Meet The Press (Tim Russert)

Below are the topics and guests announced for this program, along with my take on the "memes" that the show is trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.


2 posted on 10/06/2006 5:33:25 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
CBS Face The Nation (Bob Schieffer)

Below are the topics and guests announced for this program, along with my take on the "memes" that the show is trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.


3 posted on 10/06/2006 5:34:34 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Fox News Sunday (Chris Wallace)

Below are the topics and guests announced for this program, along with my take on the "memes" that the show is trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.


4 posted on 10/06/2006 5:35:27 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
ABC This Week (George Stephanopoulos)

Below are the topics and guests announced for this program, along with my take on the "memes" that the show is trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.


5 posted on 10/06/2006 5:36:19 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
CNN Late Edition (Wolf Blitzer)

Below are the topics and guests announced for this program, along with my take on the "memes" that the show is trying to push.  With each guest's name are a series of links that I found in a web search that helped me get a handle on who they are and what their likely positions will be when they are interviewed.


6 posted on 10/06/2006 5:36:59 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Thanks Phsstpok, I'll try to muddle through this tonight. Or tomorrow. LOL


7 posted on 10/06/2006 5:40:55 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Well, some of the Foley e-mails discussed things such as penis measurements.


So we should conclude that Republicans are closeted gays or perverts who measure male organs. Whereas Democrats would never measure the male parts.


And all of this should influence how we vote because????????/


8 posted on 10/06/2006 5:46:01 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; Bahbah; Txsleuth; MNJohnnie; eeevil conservative; Alas Babylon!; Seattle Conservative; ...
Ping

The Weekend Talk Show Preview Thread is up

If you would like on or off my ping list please Freepmail me

See the initial post for my "usual witty commentary"

It's week five of the drive by media campaign to win back power in Washington for those who truly deserve it (in their minds), the Dhimmicrats.  This week the attention shifts away from President Bush, because their lame but continuous attacks were beginning to work for him.  Instead they are starting to point out to the ignorant boobs out there that the Republicans are really the party of homo values, kiddie porn, dirty talk and probably worse things, like drugs or even (horrors) rock and roll!  They fully expect all right thinking conservatives (particularly those really stupid ones, you know, the Christians) to run away screaming and never support a Republican again. 

<snip>

So, what's the bottom line this week?  This is a week of frantic spin where the DBM and the Dhimmicrats try to frame yet another new "winning argument" to replace their latest "losing argument" (number 974).  Watch for lots of declarations of victory for the forces of Soros that ring increasingly hollow.  The question at this point is how desperate will they be to shut down the investigation if it dares to look at "what the Dhimmicrats knew and when they knew it."  Several senior members of the moonbat left may be seriously at risk over this whole Foley affair.

Woo hoo!  All I have to do to get my post up on Friday night is to take the day off on Friday!  Wait a minute, that's not a viable solution...! 

Anyway, have at it and sleep well in the knowledge that the terror that is Phsstpok isn't responsible for the Sunday awards until sometime in December!!!!!! 


9 posted on 10/06/2006 5:49:11 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Get a grip.

As repugnant as it is, Foley wrote those emails to an adult, by law. There's a difference between IM and e-mail that seems to get lost on all this too.

Beyond that, wait for the facts to come out instead of jumping to conclusions. We hate it when Democrats do it and it's no better when Republicans do it.


10 posted on 10/06/2006 5:52:28 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
I'll probably watch FNS and none of the others, no surprise. I am hoping this will be the end of the Foley surprise and we can address important issues. Maybe not, but I hope so.

I fully expect Brit Hume to be the only person this weekend to understand and comment about Foley and what's going on. Foley is gone, Democrats need to get used to that. The Democrats who had knowledge of what really happened are still there and need to be held accountable.

All of the above could be somewhat moot IF the North Koreans launch a missile tomorrow.
11 posted on 10/06/2006 5:57:28 PM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

I will check in on Fox News Sunday in order to see how much of a turncoat each of those pseudo-Republicans are. Feh.


12 posted on 10/06/2006 6:34:22 PM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver

Good point about the N. Korean missile...but, the dems would just say that Bush told them to...to get the Foley thing out of the news....LOL


13 posted on 10/06/2006 7:35:24 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME----You need FR, you know you do, so how about donating??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Hey...I like it when you do the awards...you always are really sweet and manage to find ONE decent post by me..LOL


BTW..I saw on a Fox show tonight...they are advertising Jack Kingston and Marty Meehan on Sunday.

Marty Meehan...the last time he was on Fox...it was BOR, I believe, and I can't remember the topic...but, I remember that Meehan didn't answer even one of Bill's questions...LOL


14 posted on 10/06/2006 7:37:18 PM PDT by Txsleuth (FREEPATHON TIME----You need FR, you know you do, so how about donating??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And all of this should influence how we vote because????????/

A good question. It seems the Democrat Noise Machine, having decided that references to female homosexuality (aka Mary Cheney in 2004) did not drive us nasty right wing Christian Fundemnatlists running screaming from the Republican Party maybe a story on male homosexuality with a phony child molestation charge worked in would.


15 posted on 10/07/2006 7:30:03 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
will check in on Fox News Sunday in order to see how much of a turncoat each of those pseudo-Republicans

Is kind of a defining moment for our side. Intresting to note once again the DC-Real world divide. The "Conservatives" most in angst and looking for Hastert's head are mostly inside the Beltway people. The ones outside the belt way have seemed better able to resist getting sucked into the Democrat Noise Machine

16 posted on 10/07/2006 7:35:20 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A.Hun; Bahbah; Txsleuth; MNJohnnie; eeevil conservative; Alas Babylon!; Seattle Conservative; ...
TXSleuth informed me that Marty Meehan has been added to the Fox News Sunday lineup, so here's his info

Still no change on the FNS web site and the news outlets haven't posted their show listings yet, nor has Mark Kilmer.  More if anything comes along.

Thanks, sleuth.

17 posted on 10/07/2006 7:57:28 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Wallace admitted Friday they were still working on the lineup so this isn't a surprise, but thanks for the heads up on who it would be.

One guess is more than a few Democrats want to keep a low profile for tomorrow in light of more truth on Foley coming out.


18 posted on 10/07/2006 8:02:21 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
Agreed that the Beltway Boys has gotten so predictable it isn't worth the time, and FNW lacks any smidgen of courage. A real examination of BIG media would be worthwhile, but would end party invitations. When the only interesting comments come from Gabler (a liar and a moonbat), it's over.

But there is the JER:They're real focus is American demographics, like Social Security a controversial topic that everyone simply wants to ignore but one which will clearly affect all of our lives far more than almost anything else on the world stage today.

Every thinking person (unfortunately, there are not enough of them) knows Social Security is doomed unless something is done. The President, wisely, wanted to give people the right to keep a small part of the confiscated funds and see how it would work out in the free market. The dems knew that people would like having ownership of some of their money and watching it grow so they couldn't let that happen. If dems ever take charge (please don't let that happen), you will have a reprise of the Clinton's "I had no idea how bad the situation was, and I have no choice but to raise taxes" refrain. And the clobbering of the citizens' pocketbook will be massive.

19 posted on 10/07/2006 9:07:12 AM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
I think you hit the nail on the head!

Political purists disturb me, because they have to put political thought into little cubicles of activity and substance, despite the fact that in reality, everyone is different, and can't be so easily categorized.

This is how we can get a Harry Bellafonte calling Colin Powell a "house Negro", Clarance Thomas an "Uncle Tom" or Condi Rice "Bush's sex Negress". You see, in the purist's mind, all blacks MUST think alike. They could never, ever be Republican, unless there was something mentally wrong with them, they hated themselves for being born black, or they hate their race. REAL black people are left-wing democrats just like them, with left-wing biases and demands. Tow the line!

The same line of thought applies to many homosexual activists. To wit, you cannot be a homosexual Republican. Republicans hate fags, and therefore want to murder them like Scot Shepard in Wyoming, or go back to the days when Greasers got their kicks beating up queers. So any outing of gay Republicans is perfectly alright, because they're hypocrites who deserve it.

Republicans, in the purist's minds, since they hate fags, but allow some in the party to secretly be fags, must be using homosexuals to get votes they do not deserve. So dirty tricks against them, lies, half-truths, etc, don't matter; all are perfectly allowable in the war against the RepubliNazis.

If smearing some homosexuals as child molesters, and the Republican leadership as secret supporters/enablers of child molesters gets those evil Republicans out of government then that is obviously a good thing. And sticking it to those homosexuals who have the gall to be Republicans or support the ideals of Republicanism is a wonderful thing, akin to St George slaying the dragon.

This is the attitude that many so-called journalists have, and why they report certain stories the way they do. My thought is that these "journalists" are far more dangerous than the purists, as they act as gatekeeprs to what the rest of us learn (however wrongly) or remain in ignorance thereof, because we're never told.

People like you, and the rest of the "Jedi Council", are absolutely essential in showing the truth, especially to those so-called journalists. That you can do so with humor and laughter makes it all the better. The free press is dying because of these reporters, and it is up to us to kick them off their high horses so that they (or others willing to step up to the task) may become once again what a free press is supposed to be--a free, fair, balanced accounter of what is happening in the world.

20 posted on 10/07/2006 9:37:03 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson