Posted on 10/07/2006 12:38:38 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Liberals are experts at framing debates in their favor. Since the Foley fiasco hit the news, the emphasis has been on evils lurking within the Republican Party.
Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years. … But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual no longer seemed to matter."
Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential? Could it be because the Democrat Party embraces legalizing homosexual marriage and inserting homosexual material into public school textbooks designed for children as young as grammar school, as demonstrated in recent efforts by the California Legislature to indoctrinate students? That is the real story behind this media blitz that Democrats want Americans to miss.
While the leftist media focuses on the political ramifications surrounding Foley in an effort to gain points for liberal candidates in the upcoming election, the fact that a homosexual rather than a heterosexual preyed on a young male is being oddly overlooked. Few people are talking about it. And the question is "Why not?" The answer is important because to ignore it is to dismiss the real plight of many homosexuals today and their impact upon our culture, our children and our political scene.
Foley admits that he is a homosexual. Dare the question be asked whether homosexuals commit higher rates of molestation than heterosexuals do? Or are the thought police hard at work silencing the possible implications?
English professor Karla Jay, Ph.D., and well-educated journalist Allen Young, both homosexual activists, conducted the first major survey on homosexuality in America in 1979. Their work is still cited in academic studies and involved over 5,000 homosexuals from all walks of life. Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex, disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.
One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23 percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged 13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this age group." Tragically, 50 percent of the males in their survey experienced their first sexual encounter at age 15 or less.
In spite of the fact that two gay researchers produced "The Gay Report," radical homosexual activists dismiss it as outdated. This is ironic considering they so often cite the much older 1948 "10 percent of society is gay" statistic from the oft-disputed Alfred Kinsey study.
But out of courtesy for their concerns, are there other esteemed elites drawing the same conclusions? Contrary to the homosexual assertion that heterosexual molestations outnumber those committed by homosexuals, Yale and Harvard-connected psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover states that "careful studies show that pedophilia is far more common among homosexuals than heterosexuals." Satinover adds, "The greater absolute number of heterosexual cases reflects the fact that heterosexual males outnumber homosexual males by approximately 36 to 1. Heterosexual child molestation cases outnumber homosexual cases by only 11 to 1, implying that pedophilia is more than three times more common among homosexuals."
So considering the fact that this type of sexual interest is shown by studies to occur more often in homosexual populations, is it any surprise that Mark Foley admitted he himself was molested as a teenager by a clergyman?
According to a report by Gregory Rogers featured on the website for the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, such issues raise "immediate questions … should gay priests be allowed access to Sunday Schools or youth groups?" Instead of asking that question, however, the liberal cohorts shift the spotlight off the homosexuals themselves and onto the church as a whole, just as they're now doing with the Republicans even though they themselves have a stained record in this regard.
While pointing their fingers at Republicans, who may have overlooked gross evil while focusing on political gain, liberals overlook a tremendous evil themselves by ignoring the truth about homosexual behavior. They fail to speak out for the innocent children caught in the path of a rabid homosexual agenda fueled by wounded people who refuse to change.
The truth is that the majority of Republicans oppose same-sex marriage and the insertion of homosexual dogma into schools, while most Democrats support it.
As David Kupelian states in his groundbreaking best seller "The Marketing of Evil," "The end game is not only to bring about the complete acceptance of homosexuality, including same-sex marriage, but also to prohibit and even criminalize public criticism of homosexuality."
And all of this at the expense of our children.
This is the whole crux (pun intended) of their attack on creationism - - they are really frustrated by Genesis, but cannot destroy the axiomatic state of procreant human biology, it does not fit their religious agenda.
Homosexual monogamy advocates seek ceremonious sanctification of their anatomical perversions and esoteric absolution for their guilt-ridden, impoverished egos.
Neither of those will satisfy their universal dissatisfaction with mortality or connect them to something eternal. With pantheons of fantasies as their medium of infinitization, they still have nothing in them of reality, any more than there is in the things that seem to stand before us in a dream.
Homosexual deviancy is really a pagan practice (and a self-induced social psychosis) at war with the Judaic culture over what is written in the book of Genesis (1:27, 2:18).
This is exactly what the National Socialists were at war with... so, when someone uses the term "Gaystapo," they might not realize how close to the truth they really are. (Consider the National Socialist eugenic breeding programs.)
Many will seek ceremonious sanctification and esoteric absolution in some type of marriage rite, but that still fails to give them a connection to the eternal in both a religious and temporal, procreant sense - - the union does not produce offspring.
Dissatisfaction with inevitable mortality only feeds the impoverishment of the ego further. Homosexuals really hate human life; their whole desire is rooted in the destruction of it...
Barney Franks a homo but thats O.K. because he's a democrat.
Beyond that, the very tolerance of unnatural behavior is a threat to the entire organization. According to 1 Corinthians 5:6 "Do you not know that a little yeast leavens all of the dough?"
I'm reminded of this every time I get a prostate exam. How anyone can find such an invasion pleasurable is beyond me.
Fudge Packing is a learned behaviour and a pretty disgusting one at that......................
Ricoshea said: "Larry King said the term pedophile about 6 times the other night about Foley and I thought there is no mention that he is a homosexual as if they are trying to distance him from that."
Excellent point.
That's exactly what they're trying to do. Throw a smokescreen over the whole issue.
And it's a boldfaced lie!
Evidently the research shows that homosexuals commit far higher rates of molestation than heterosexuals do. Apparently pedophilia and homosexuality are very much in bed with each other.
Sheesh! Who wudda guessed?!
NO.... should be..
My observation over my short span of time here on this earth is that liberals know more about RINOs conservatives than RINOs conservatives know about liberals.....
I always wonder who tears down the partitions that separates urinals? Is it homosexuals or pediphiles?
Could be... America is becomeing MORE socialist not LESS socialist.. RINOs are cross dressed democrats(socialists).. Seems many are ignorant that Socialism is Slavery by Givernment.. in every case.. not in some cases..
NAMBLA comes to mind.
No. Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Attraction to adolescents is ephebophilia. If both parties are males, it can be construed pederasty. But pedophilia is an imprecise and somewhat loaded term in this case.
The fact that a majority of people 'accepted' the Clinton's perversion just showed how much people love money. Just like the Bible says.
They weren't willing to rock the rising stock market boat by booting the Clinton administration --- even though the rising market was actually a valuation bubble that was willingly encouraged by lax SEC enforcement.
The SEC looked the other way as bankers and stock analysts conspired to cook the books by giving out unrealistic rosy earnings scenarios, which of course later proved false.
Thus the bubble burst in 2000 - SURPRISE - right at the end of the Clinton administration.
And naturally, the Bush run SEC had to prosecute the wrong-doers from the go-bubble 1990a, like WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, etc. all of which did their deeds in the 90s.
I was often preyed upon by homos. It was because of certain laws that compelled me to leave the pervs unharmed. These studies confirm just how bad it is out there. And with today's glorifying of homosexuality, hell, even celebrated, it must be much worse now.
Thank you for providing the proper definitions and in answer to the earlier poster, there is no doubt that using the 'pedophile' term gives great cover to the males sexually violating male children. Once it is simply 'pedophilia', the specific nature of it is lost. I can't think of a good example...... but it would be akin to someone with herpes claiming that his/her problem was simply a virus and thus was no different than someone who had a common cold. The meaning would be lost by using such a general term.
Language itself is so very important in this discussion and in fact the group that controls the language will ultimately gain control of the agenda. In other posts here, I've been trying to encourage everyone to avoid the trap. Let me give a very simple and specific example. I personally do not believe that there is any such thing as a homosexual - and in fact, the term did not exist until relatively recently. Where has the word come from? Who is behind its usage? How has it become popularized? I would submit that human sexuality is a characteristic that is innate to all - and that the ways that the sexuality manifest itself can be either normal or deviant. However, by falling into the language trap of using the word 'homosexual', this implies that since it exists, it must have some legitimacy and normality about it. That there are human beings on this planet that engage themselves in homosexual activities is not in question since we know that happens. However, they are not homosexuals.... they are just humans who are expressing their God given sexuality in a deviant manner. So instead of using the term 'homosexual', the more appropriate term would to call him/her 'one who engages in homosexual acts'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.