Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: no dems
And I do understand your very astute points, no dems.

To lower ones' self to playing the Dem game, is to lose on scorecard points, but win in the large. Proving the adage that "no good deed goes unpunished".

Negotiating with the FoleyDems is tantamount to appeasement with dictators and feeds the "repubs and democrats are the same party" peeps who are in fact, using this argument to promote their own "political" parties.

But one thing I have learned through the years about those adhering to the "du jour" perception game? They value security more than they do the pro-homosexual party of the Democrats. Most don't want homosexuality to be a topic on the national table whatsoever. Or around their kids, or running their countries. They might not say so to the survey-takers; but they sure as hell say so in private venues.

Dems are anti-US. And now they are trying to forge ahead being "anti-gayness around the babies"? Dems say they are against war, but want a war on "gayness" in the Republican Party?

Sure, some knuckledraggers will be highlighted in MSM venues supporting the Dems Foley-gate, as tho this is a concensus opinion nationwide. But, it's a delusion.

20 posted on 10/12/2006 6:42:03 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Alia
And now they are trying to forge ahead being "anti-gayness around the babies"?

And, if they're not careful, it could backfire on them from their "Gay base support".
26 posted on 10/12/2006 6:51:43 AM PDT by no dems (I'll take a moral Mormon over a demonic Democrat or repugnant RINO anyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson