Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnny7

Between freddie and billie crystal this is why I would never have the "weak-ly standard" in my home.



So freddie there is NOTHING that will change from now until Nov. 7? In that case why don't we cancel the election and give the money we save to Speaker pelosi's favorite charity?



Now that just about every poll has shown that there has been no effect from the foley incident, we are left where we were before.



We have the best economy in our lifetimes- Dow at all time highs, and 401Ks are glowing again. Gas is down and we have not been attacked in 5 years.


I suggest that everyone take a look at the GOP GOTV. It might be helpful. The history of mid term elections shows an average of about 34.2% turn out. In 1994 we kicked it up by 3.5% and made huge gains. In 2004 we got 62 million votes. There is a huge upside available and we know more about how to run a great GOTV now.


15 posted on 10/14/2006 4:57:59 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (DON'T BELIEVE PESSIMISM: FEELINGS ARE FOR LOVE SONGS. FACTS ARE FOR PREDICTING WHO WINS IN NOV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

And here is the Newsweek Headline in 2002. It's too bad we don;t have a ready libray of predictions and polls from all of these sources. Polling is bordering on Fraud. I found one--I'm sure there are hundreds of stories like this one that are media generated.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3068006


Democrats Take the Lead in Midterms
While George W. Bush focuses on building support for war with Iraq, voters say they are most concerned about the economy.



By Jennifer Barrett
Newsweek Web Exclusive
Updated: 7:09 a.m. ET Sept 28, 2002
Sept. 28 - With less than six weeks until the November mid-term elections, Democratic Congressional candidates have taken the lead among voters, according to the latest NEWSWEEK poll.


IF THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS for U.S. Congress were held today, more registered voters say they would vote for the Democratic candidate (47 percent) than the Republican candidate (40 percent) in their district. Thirteen percent say the would vote for another party’s candidate or are undecided. That’s a turnabout from the NEWSWEEK poll taken just after President George W. Bush’s Sept. 12 speech on Iraq to the United Nations, when 43 percent said they would vote for the GOP candidate, vs. 41 percent fot he Democrat.

Democrats need to pick up just six seats in the House of Representatives to gain control. In the Senate, Democrats already have a one-seat majority, and Republicans have more seats to defend.


20 posted on 10/14/2006 5:03:51 AM PDT by pkmaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

We can only hope all GOP voters out there are as motivated as we here are. But not all those polls can be wrong. Things are not looking too good right now. Funny that as the GOP has spent millions on ads their numbers seem to have gone down.

If the Foley "scandal" (what a joke) really is going to depress Republican turn out then the party can only blame itself. Are these voters really so wimpy that they would rather let the far left take over because they somehow were upset an obscure congressman engaged in some raunchy emails?? If that is the case then the party could not have been very strong to begin with.


29 posted on 10/14/2006 5:13:05 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

freddie and billy are faux conservatives whose knees buckle quickly at the slightly sign of trouble. The Weakly Standard is a silly and irrelevant and the National Review. Both are run by a bunch of inbred sissies.


32 posted on 10/14/2006 5:14:30 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
We have the best economy in our lifetimes

Last night on TV I heard a lib pundit mention the "terrible shape" the economy was in. It irks me no end to see comments like that go unchallenged.
I recall a breakdown of public opinion as - ask people how the country is doing- they tend to be pessimistic and follow lib media. Ask them how their state is doing and they are a bit more optimistic- ask them about their town, things are even better- ask them about themselves, and things are great.
70 posted on 10/14/2006 5:56:36 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
We have the best economy in our lifetimes- Dow at all time highs, and 401Ks are glowing again. Gas is down and we have not been attacked in 5 years.

In the end, all politics IS local, and most incumbents will win. I predict we hold by 3. It could go the other way, and Nancy may have a plurality of 1-2. But she would be tearing her hair out trying to keep it together. With 435 members. people get sick and die. The majority could flip often if we were in a situation like that. Not exactly a win for Pelosi. More like a nightmare.

120 posted on 10/14/2006 7:50:10 AM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson