Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banker to poor wins Nobel Peace Prize
AP ^ | 10/14/06

Posted on 10/14/2006 6:49:47 AM PDT by Valin

DHAKA, Bangladesh - The simple yet revolutionary idea of loaning tiny sums to poor people looking to escape poverty by starting businesses won Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank he founded the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday. Yunus' notion - today, known as microcredit - has spread around the globe in the past three decades and is said to have helped more than 100 million people take their first steps to rise out of poverty.

Some bought diary cows, others egg-laying hens. In recent years, money for a single cell phone has been enough to start thriving enterprises in isolated villages without phone lines from East Asia to West Africa. "Lasting peace cannot be achieved unless large population groups find ways in which to break out of poverty," the Nobel Committee said in its citation in Oslo, Norway. "Microcredit is one such means. Development from below also serves to advance democracy and human rights." The 65-year-old economist said he would use part of his share of the $1.4 million award to create a company to make low-cost, high-nutrition food for the poor. The rest would go toward setting up an eye hospital for the poor in Bangladesh, he said. The food company, to be known as Social Business Enterprise, will sell food for a nominal price.

Yunus is the first Nobel Prize winner from Bangladesh, a poverty-stricken Southeast Asian nation of about 141 million people on the Bay of Bengal. "I am so, so happy, it's really a great news for the whole nation," Yunu said after the prize was announced. He was reached by telephone at his home in the Bangladeshi capital, Dhaka. His joy was shared by those his microcredit program has helped. "I can't express in words how happy I am," said Gulbadan Nesa, 40, who five years ago used $90 from the Grameen Bank to buy chickens so she could sell eggs. She's since taken more loans and expanded into selling building materials.

"Not long ago I was almost begging for money to feed my family," she said from Bishnurampur, her village in northern Bangladesh. "Today, I've got my own house and enough money to feed my children and send them to school." Grameen, which means rural in the Bengali language, was the first lender to hand out microcredit, giving small loans to poor Bangladeshis who did not qualify for loans from conventional banks. No collateral is needed for Grameen loans, which average about $200.

But there is social pressure to repay. Recipients form groups of five and members qualify for future loans only if all are current on old ones. The results are hard to argue with - the bank says it has a 99 percent repayment rate. The bank says it has loaned $5.72 billion to 6.6 million Bangladeshi, 97 percent of whom were women, and today provides services in more than 70,000 villages. The success has allowed Grameen to expand its credit to include housing loans, financing for irrigation and fisheries as well as traditional savings accounts.

But Grameen is not without critics, many of whom focus on the bank's high interest rates. Its business loans carry a rate of 20 percent, significantly higher than the 10-15 percent charged by commercial banks. "While the poor pay 20 percent interest for their loan, the rich pay much less. It can't be called social justice," said S.M. Akash, an economics professor at Dhaka University. Reports routinely circulate in Bangladesh's media of people being forced to borrow from second or third sources, often at higher interest rates, to repay Grameen loans. But almost no one is willing put their names to such criticism in Bangladesh, where Yunus was considered a national hero even before the Nobel Prize was announced.

How much impact Grameen has had on Bangladesh's economy also remains an open question. Poverty has decreased since Grameen was founded in 1983. Bangladesh's per capita income has grown from $280 in 1985 to $440 in 2006, according to World Bank figures. While the bank was "a factor" in that success, economists "can't apportion exactly how much credit has to go with Grameen," said Jonathan Morduch, an expert on microfinance at New York University.

And even if per capita income has increased, overwhelmingly Muslim Bangladesh remains one of the world's poorest countries, a land beset by political unrest and the ever-present specter of another military coup. In fact, the spread of Yunus' and Grameen's microcredit schemes around the world - they are now considered a key approach to spurring development - is arguably one of the few bright spots for Bangladesh since it won independence from Pakistan in 1973. Worldwide, microcredit financing is estimated to have helped 92 million families last year alone, according to Jove Oliver, spokesman for the Microcredit Summit Campaign, part of the Washington-based Project Results Educational Fund.

Yunus told The Associated Press in 2004 that his "eureka moment" came while chatting to a shy woman weaving bamboo stools with calloused fingers. Sufia Begum was a 21-year-old mother of three when he met her in 1974 and asked how much she earned. She replied that she borrowed about five taka, the equivalent of nine cents, from a middleman for the bamboo for each stool. All but two cents of that went back to the lender. "I thought to myself, my God, for five takas she has become a slave," Yunus said in the interview. The following day, he and his students did a survey in the woman's village, Jobra, and discovered that 43 villagers owed a total of $27. "I couldn't take it anymore. I put the $27 out there and told them they could liberate themselves," he said, and pay him back whenever they could. The idea was to buy their own materials and cut out the middleman. Over the following year, they all paid him back - day by day.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 2006; bangladesh; billclinton; clinton; grameenbank; highinterestloans; microfinance; muhammadyunus; nobel; nobelpeaceprize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Valin


"Hello, Mama Sheehan? Missed it by THAT much!"
21 posted on 10/14/2006 9:50:02 AM PDT by kenth (There are three kinds of people in the world. Those who can count, and those who can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Did you miss this part, pantload?

Recipients form groups of five and members qualify for future loans only if all are current on old ones. The results are hard to argue with - the bank says it has a 99 percent repayment rate.

Many Asian groups do the same thing here in the USA. Loans get paid back by the those who succeed while the losers are frozen out even as their debts get repaid (although sometimes they must repay their debts within the community). It works extremely well, especially in rural villages and tight-knit ethic communities.

22 posted on 10/14/2006 10:47:51 AM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is never better than knowledge. - Enrico Fermi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

at least they didn't give it to Cindy Sheehan lol


23 posted on 10/14/2006 10:48:55 AM PDT by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

There are lots of stories on the web about the Grameen Bank. You could look some of them up. I understand it's easier to just sit on FR and say "I'm cynical", though. The Grameen Bank has been around - and has been well publicized - for several years. It's apparent that you never heard of it before this week.


24 posted on 10/14/2006 10:49:32 AM PDT by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003
The Grameen Bank has been around - and has been well publicized - for several years.

So has Amway.

25 posted on 10/14/2006 12:31:27 PM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: balrog666


Yeah, yeah, and "the opportunities are unlimited".


26 posted on 10/14/2006 12:32:56 PM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Yeah, yeah, and "the opportunities are unlimited".

So I waaaaas right about the pantload being in your head.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!

27 posted on 10/14/2006 3:01:58 PM PDT by balrog666 (Ignorance is never better than knowledge. - Enrico Fermi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Aren't you clever. I just don't even know where to start to address your stunning and brilliant argument.

Maybe you should get a Nobel prize, too.
28 posted on 10/14/2006 8:14:30 PM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

They have to- to get a loan they have to make sure the other four women they are tied to pay up.

But here’s what I’m curious about- why would a guy running loan program which has a loan repayment rate of 98-99% need US SBA grants and $13 million from the US State Dept?


29 posted on 06/04/2017 4:06:49 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003

Here’s one:

MAY 2012 : (BANGLADESH : INVESTIGATION OF GRAMEEN BANK [see MOHAMMAD YUNUS, CLINTON FOUNDATION]) Membership has its privileges.[http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/25/exclusive-hillary-aides-threatened-prime-ministers-son-with-irs-audit/]
A Bangladesh government commission was investigating multiple charges of financial mismanagement at Grameen Bank, beginning in May 2012. Muhammad Yunus, a major Clinton Foundation donor, served as managing director of the bank.
-—— Did Clintons Try to Shut Down Investigation of Foundation Donor w/IRS Audit?
April 26, 2017 Daniel Greenfield 7


30 posted on 06/04/2017 4:10:08 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pete98
Banks are not known for throwing money away...why would they make this up?

Maybe because the philanthropist and his companies and associates received millions from the US taxpayer and kicked back a hundred thousand or so to a "charitable" Clinton foundation?

31 posted on 06/04/2017 4:14:32 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson