Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/14/2006 10:54:16 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: maquiladora
Just breaking news banner on CNN so far.

North Korea clearly stated they would regard this as a "declaration of war". So lets see if they are as good as the promise here, as they were when they announced they planned a nuclear test.

2 posted on 10/14/2006 10:56:11 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

I'll Drink To That

3 posted on 10/14/2006 10:57:32 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

BFD


4 posted on 10/14/2006 10:57:48 AM PDT by TomServo ("Uh, Donner, party of three please.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

"The language is directed at North Korean leader Kim Jong Il, who has a long, documented record of living a life of luxury while his people wasted away in famine."

This didn't work on Saddam, why would they think it will work on dear leader?


5 posted on 10/14/2006 10:57:56 AM PDT by Felis_irritable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
ruhroh.... Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
6 posted on 10/14/2006 10:57:58 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Islam is the Death Cult of Perpetual Outrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
punish Pyongyang

There is no such thing. There are treaties and there is war. This is an act of war, but the UN is not sovereign, so it is the countries who allied in this act of war who are at war. If N Kor does not respond in a warlike manner, they are incapable of making war.

7 posted on 10/14/2006 10:58:06 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Well, now we'll se what actual impact such sanctions have on NK. Will Russia and China actually participate? I'll be surprised if they do.


8 posted on 10/14/2006 10:58:11 AM PDT by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

I'm sure Kim is scared to death of the mighty UN.....


10 posted on 10/14/2006 11:00:00 AM PDT by ohioWfan (George W. Bush - "Take his character all together, and we shall not look upon his like again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

If enforced, this will be the toughest resolution from the UN since Gulf War I.


12 posted on 10/14/2006 11:00:46 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

I wonder if this is meaningful at all. I can't believe there was any trade with N. Korea. This agreement probably lets humanitarian aid through (which the army will steal) and if Iran was giving them weapons or tech before, I can't believe it was on the up-and-up. Even still, China could be a conduit for anything Lil Kim wants.

What matters is if China really wants to enforce its vote here.


13 posted on 10/14/2006 11:00:52 AM PDT by AmishDude (Mwahahahahahahahaha -- official evil laugh of the North American Union)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Thank You John Bolton!!

Despite the ranting from the Left, and Democrats in general, Bolton has pulled off the impossible; that is, getting China to agree to bring the matter before the Security Council in the first place. For the past 12 years, China has vetoed every attempt by the United States to bring North Korea before the Security Council. It took some persuading for that to change, and it is Bolton who deserves all of the credit for making that happen.

Maybe now we can persuade Senator Lincoln Chaffee, to lift his hold on Bolton's nomination to be permanent Ambassador to the United Nations. Now more than ever, it is vital to have someone with an even hand, and a persuasive voice in the UN. If that madman starts tossing warheads around, someone is going to have to respond. Best that we work with the UN to head things off before we get to that point...


17 posted on 10/14/2006 11:03:12 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

19 posted on 10/14/2006 11:05:29 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
" North Korea clearly stated they would regard this as a "declaration of war".

North Korea is going to take on the whole world? Interesting. They have become proficient at eating bugs for dinner, so I guess finding food as legions of North Koreans march across china, Russia and into Europe. All they need to carry is a bottle of Crisco and a frying pan. They might even be helpful by eating up all the rats in their path.

22 posted on 10/14/2006 11:06:18 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary (Bukhari:V1B1N6 “Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
The U.N. Security Council votes unanimously to impose sanctions on North Korea to punish Pyongyang for its purported nuclear test.

After seeing Bolton's talk, I can anticipate the lib's in Congress to do everything in their power to prevent him from becoming permanent in his position as U.N. Ambassador.

After all, he was fabulous and very pragmatic toward the issues with the PRNK.

He is the best Ambassador we have had since Jean Kirkpatrick!

23 posted on 10/14/2006 11:06:24 AM PDT by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

How soon until the sleeper cells in Japan are activated?

Anyway, this is a rather weak bunch of sanctions. Unfortunately, it seems like it's the best we could do with Russia and China being such pains in the rear.


26 posted on 10/14/2006 11:07:13 AM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

The RATS' likely response: This resolution is another Bush Administration failure. Bush should negotiate directly with NK.


30 posted on 10/14/2006 11:09:25 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora
The U.N. Security Council

Sheeple fear them!

34 posted on 10/14/2006 11:10:09 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Now we will wait to see how the Rats and their MSM lapdogs spin this good news to be something bad they can blame on Bush.


37 posted on 10/14/2006 11:11:28 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

WOW! North Korea is screwed! UN Sanctions, aside from being the most damaging of all weapons, are always ruthlessly enforced. North Korea will soon be on its knees. With these UN Sanctions, North Korea will be hard pressed to do much more than fund its military and its people will struggle just to be fed - they soon will no doubt begin eating tree bark. Finally, we have shown the world that we are serious about stopping nuclear proliferation. From the standpoint of a rogue regime, UN Sanctions are even worse than military strikes. It almost makes me feel bad for Kim Jung Il.


41 posted on 10/14/2006 11:14:24 AM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maquiladora

Double-Secret Probation
44 posted on 10/14/2006 11:17:07 AM PDT by sono ("Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards." Samuel Huntington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson