Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survivor! The GOP Victory
Barrons.com ^ | 10-21-06 | JIM MCTAGUE

Posted on 10/21/2006 7:08:14 AM PDT by veronica

JUBILANT DEMOCRATS SHOULD RECONSIDER their order for confetti and noisemakers. The Democrats, as widely reported, are expecting GOP-weary voters to flock to the polls in two weeks and hand them control of the House for the first time in 12 years -- and perhaps the Senate, as well. Even some Republicans privately confess that they are anticipating the election-day equivalent of Little Big Horn. Pardon our hubris, but we just don't see it.

Our analysis -- based on a race-by-race examination of campaign-finance data -- suggests that the GOP will hang on to both chambers, at least nominally. We expect the Republican majority in the House to fall by eight seats, to 224 of the chamber's 435. At the very worst, our analysis suggests, the party's loss could be as large as 14 seats, leaving a one-seat majority. But that is still a far cry from the 20-seat loss some are predicting. In the Senate, with 100 seats, we see the GOP winding up with 52, down three.

We studied every single race -- all 435 House seats and 33 in the Senate -- and based our predictions about the outcome in almost every race on which candidate had the largest campaign war chest, a sign of superior grass-roots support. We ignore the polls.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.barrons.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barrons; elections; votegop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 10/21/2006 7:08:15 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica

Opps, looks like the Democrats woke up 2 weeks too early.


2 posted on 10/21/2006 7:09:17 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (EeevilCon, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Gun Owning Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Interesting take on elections. Money means everything and ideas and personalities are irrelevant. I will be interested to se how close these guys are come Nov 8.


3 posted on 10/21/2006 7:13:58 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
After listening to some 'cut and run republicans' on Rush yesterday I was pretty disgusted. I've never seen a good excuse to NOT go to the polls. If you have issues than write letters and participate in the 'system'.

IMHO, they are no better than the Dims who want to cuddle with the terrorist. If you haven't noticed, things are kinda critical (scary) right now.

Like I said...IMHO only.

Oh..and if you don't vote you lose your right to complain!

4 posted on 10/21/2006 7:18:09 AM PDT by sweet_diane ("They hate us 'cause they ain't us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweet_diane

As Rush noted yesterday, he really only had 2 callers of the cut-and-run sort, and they were very unconvincing IMO.


5 posted on 10/21/2006 7:19:45 AM PDT by veronica (http://www.freerepublic.com/~starcmc/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sweet_diane

AMEN!!!


6 posted on 10/21/2006 7:20:56 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: veronica; All
If there's one thing I hope the RINO's get out of this scare (if not defeat) is that the conservative voting public is tired of seeing nothing of their agenda being passed. How difficult is it for them to realize that I know how to spend my money better than they do, yet, even controlling the House and the Senate, they barely maintained the tax cut. This Congress has not been a do-nothing Congress...it's been a do-nothing for conservatives Congress and I'm pretty fed up with 'em all.
7 posted on 10/21/2006 7:22:10 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I don't think that is what they are implying. The money raised correlates to the passion of the base, and that's hard to poll. But that passion translates to votes on election day, which is the only poll that really matters, as they say.


8 posted on 10/21/2006 7:22:14 AM PDT by veronica (http://www.freerepublic.com/~starcmc/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: econjack
This Congress has not been a do-nothing Congress...it's been a do-nothing for conservatives...

And so the logic is vote the other side in and they will do even less?? That's just NUTS.

And if nothing else, think of what the current Supreme Court would be like if Kerry had won...

9 posted on 10/21/2006 7:25:33 AM PDT by veronica (http://www.freerepublic.com/~starcmc/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The next Speaker of the House (second in line to the President):

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

10 posted on 10/21/2006 7:26:08 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I agree with the general thrust of this article, that the candidate with the most money generally wins. I wrote an article in the Orlando Sentinel in August, 1992, predicting all 435 House races. My co-author Ed Roeder and I used only two factors in our predictions: relative fund-raising and whether there was an incumbent in the race.

We used FEC data on fund-raising as of reports filed on 31 July. In many states, the primaries had not been conducted, and the general elections were a light-year away. Still, our predictions were 99.5% accurate. We were wrong, as I recall, in only three races.

Since I know my own District, I challenge this article's prediction that Charles Taylor (R) will hang on in the NC 11th District against Heath Shuler (D). But in general, this analysis is accurate on the facts about fund-raising now, and its historical analysis of what that means for electoral success.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "An Open Letter to President Bollinger"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

11 posted on 10/21/2006 7:26:54 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
See my comment earlier in this thread. In 1992 I and a co-author predicted the 435 House races in print in August. As here, we used money raised as the primary indicator of success. We were 99.5% accurate as of November.

John / Billybob
12 posted on 10/21/2006 7:29:21 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Guess your take is correct. I went there and read the entire article. It's a good way of looking at elections given the past predictive ability of their model. I also see they predict my congressman, Charles Taylor, will win based on his fundraising despite the last poll I saw that had him 11 points down.

Thursday was the first day for early voting here in NC. I was at the polls at 9:30 AM to vote and I wasn't even close to being one of the first people there.


13 posted on 10/21/2006 7:30:17 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Interesting basis for analysis. I will be curious to see if it holds true. I can, though, see the argument for it. Given the campaign rules, an individual candidate's finances will be larger with broader support. Those supporters will also be more motivated to show up on election day than the random individual being telephoned in a poll. The 'Rats seem to have money coming in larger chunks from fewer individuals and flowing to the 527's. The 2004 elections showed that strategy to not be as effective as expected. If anything, since the money is coming from the kook-fringe it is functioning to drive the Rat's even more in that direction making them less palatable to the majority. I do believe that the Republicans have weaknesses and a there is a general sense of dissatisfaction ('Rats won't like them anyway and the Republican base is unhappy with the number of RINOs). However, I am thinking that the whole 'Rat strategy of gleefully accepting boatloads of money and their marching orders from the likes of Soros will backfire. Howard Dean will once again end up forking over his lunch money to Karl Rove.
14 posted on 10/21/2006 7:32:28 AM PDT by Armando Guerra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I think someone needs to bookmark all the articles like this. Come November 8, after the only poll that matters, there will be a lot of people either eating crow or patting themselves on the back.


15 posted on 10/21/2006 7:34:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Never fear...I'd rather have a bunch of RINO's in office who can't fog a mirror than any Dimocrat. I'll vote as always, but I'm really starting to think that Boortz has the right idea:

If you pay between $1-$10,000 in Federal income taxes, you get one vote, $10,001-$20,000, two votes...up to $50,000 and 5 votes. After that, you don't get anymore votes. That way, those who are productive contributors to society get to influence what that society does and the non-controbutors have to shut up and simply accept what the largess of the others deem worthwhile.

Like I've often told my students: I'd be a horrible President, but a great Dictator!


16 posted on 10/21/2006 7:34:43 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Veronica, thanks for the informative post. I have been a subscriber to Barrons for many years and would like to give some insight to their past election predictions.

1. In 2002 when the MSM majority opinion was that the Democrats would increase their majority in the Senate, Barron's predicted a GOP takeover and had Sununu, chambliss, and Allard winning while Charlie Cook and others had them losing big.

2. In 2000 and 2002 Barron's predicted the GOP would hold the House also against Charlie Cook and Sabato DEM takeover predictions. The GOP was at a low of 221 seats back then, and Dick Gephardt predicted a DEM pickup of 30 seats on election eve 2000 and 2002.
17 posted on 10/21/2006 7:38:46 AM PDT by Welike ike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Perhaps I'm restating the obvious, but, just get out there and vote!!!


18 posted on 10/21/2006 7:41:00 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I would be content if only those who paid taxes were allowed to vote!

My sister was a liberal until she got a job...


19 posted on 10/21/2006 7:43:23 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I'm agnostic on evolution, but sit ups are from Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sweet_diane

The overwhelming majority of cut-and-run Republicans voted for Kerry enthusiastically in 2004, joined the Republican ranks for a few hours or minutes, then decided against voting their new partisan line but vocally attempt to persuade more long-standing Republicans to join them.

Come Election Day, I seriously doubt if the ranks of "cut-and-run" Republicans who actually voted (mostly) along the partisan line in 2002 and 2004 but decline to vote Republican in 2006 number more than 100,000 nationwide (about 200 per Congressional district). I exclude from this figure the deceased, incarcerated, and disenfranchised, including those military voters who reside in states that effectively exclude them from electoral participation. More Kerry voters will elect Republicans to Congress--but the media cannot find them because the can afford to poll only their own newsrooms.


20 posted on 10/21/2006 7:51:14 AM PDT by dufekin (The New York Times: an enemy espionage agency with a newsletter of enemy propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson