To: ThisLittleLightofMine
It is also refreshing that more scientists are coming forward and finally being honest about the problem Darwinian evolution presents.Cite sources please. And not some creationist screed from an uninformed and biased website please.
57 posted on
10/24/2006 12:35:04 PM PDT by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: RadioAstronomer
I asked Dave to share with us just one reason he thinks the evidence doesn't support evolution. It's been well over a full day now, with no response.
59 posted on
10/24/2006 12:38:44 PM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
To: RadioAstronomer
Under ordinary circumstances, such citations should be from established scientific organizations, but--as you ALREADY KNOW--those organizations are hardly unbiased. Why would they acknowledge that support for their current religious explanation of origins is waning? Creationism is popping up all over the news, with polls of people who support Creationism in large numbers. If the average Joe is increasingly skeptical of Macroevolutionism, surely it is logical that an increasing amount of scientists would be, too?
100 posted on
10/24/2006 8:25:34 PM PDT by
Jedi Master Pikachu
( The r/l thing is Japanese, not pan-Asian, and, in any case, making a mockery of it is rude.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson