I have never read any postings attacking science by those who profess Creationism. Most Creationists respect science and its usefulness and are only questioning the elaborate but flimsy edifice constructed on the vague and gaseous mythic like qualities of Darwinoid assumptions - that human males and females ascended from the earthworm.
It is, in fact, Creationists and ID adherents who are the true scientists here...and Darwinoid evolutionists who cannot bear the scrutiny of their flimsy work. Some science they subscribe to!
Instead of questioning Darwin’s assumption themselves – self-styled evolutionists have erected a personality cult to him and have blocked any and all criticism of the theory while ridiculing those who dare to question. This angry defense of Darwin reminds me of Marxists who deify their materialistic hero…and delight in ridiculing those who do not.
You are wrong. I have been involved in numerous discussions with folks who deny the accuracy of radiometric and radiocarbon dating. I do a lot of radiocarbon dating in my work, and have studied it for a number of years. The "talking points" I see on these threads are all from creationist websites, and consist of misrepresentations, distortions, and outright lies. I can tell the difference.
Why do we not see any scientific points made? Why do we only see creation "science" trying to pass itself off as junk science?
I think people who oppose radiometric dating on these threads are doing apologetics, not science.
If you don't agree, post some of the arguments against radiocarbon dating and I will be happy to respond.
(If I'm still around. The Luddites are getting to me.)
great post & thoughts! Hi there. I was in your "neighborhood" briefly LAST weekend & visited The Mayor & his dear Jul.. was fast & therefore didn't alert others for a bigger 'shindig'