Posted on 10/25/2006 10:22:04 PM PDT by neverdem
Op-Ed Contributor
Stanford, Calif.
DESPITE all the attention given to anthrax and smallpox and potential weapons of mass destruction, pandemic influenza is probably the worlds most serious near-term public health threat. If a strain similar in effect to the 1918 Spanish flu (which killed tens of millions of people worldwide) emerges in the next several years, it is highly likely that an effective vaccine will not be available during the pandemics first wave, that we wont have enough antiviral drugs for large-scale prophylactic use, and that hospitals will be too overwhelmed to treat most cases.
Consequently, as in 1918, we will need to combine medical efforts with voluntary and forced social changes closing schools and churches, canceling public gatherings, keeping workers at home to hinder the flus spread. Our government must draw up a plan for educating the public about effective nonpharmaceutical interventions like hand washing and face protection like masks.
A prerequisite for doing so is determining the biggest culprit in spreading influenza: droplet transmission, in which an infected person sneezes or coughs directly into the mouth, nose or eyes of someone who is susceptible); contact transmission, in which virus is transferred via hands either directly, say, through a handshake, or indirectly through an object like a doorknob; and aerosol transmission, in which evaporated virus-containing particles are inhaled.
Remarkably, this issue has not been resolved: the Department of Health and Human Services Pandemic Influenza Plan states that the relative clinical importance of each of these modes of transmission is not known. As a result, the government enthusiastically endorses frequent hand washing which would reduce contact transmission, and costs nothing but remains noncommittal about face protection. While the government says that it might be beneficial, it doesnt make respirators or masks available. Yet face protection would...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
This is BS; the world's most serious near-term threat is the international illegality of DDT thanks to noted wacko leftist Rachel Carson. During the 20th Century, she is probably #2 on the list of murderers right behind the Commie pair of Mao/Lenin.
It's official. We're all gonna die.
Weren't we all supposed to die from flesh-eating bacteria? It's always something that's going to wipe out mankind, but that "something" keeps changing.
DOOMED!
Amateurs. If you want real up-to-date info on avian flu and any other sort of infectious disease, go here:
http://www.recombinomics.com/whats_new.html
or here:
http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_topics.asp?FID=3
Don't forget SARS.
http://www.recombinomics.com/whats_new.html
or here:
http://www.avianflutalk.com/forum_topics.asp?FID=3
Thanks for your links. I glanced at yours links, but I didn't notice any with practical, public health suggestions. The author has written at least one other interesting article devoted to public health: Got Toxic Milk?
"...the world's most serious near-term threat is the international illegality of DDT..."
DITTO that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.