Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stealth jet quietly slips into history
Toronto Star ^ | Thu. Nov. 2, 2006 | Bill Taylor

Posted on 11/02/2006 4:16:00 PM PST by NucSubs

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: ASOC
" I had heard the F117 HAD to travel in company with a EF-111 jammer platform, as the -117 stuck out like a sore thumb on low band radar..... "

I didn't write that line.

But, anyway, yes, the F-22 is a better plane... is it more stealthy than the F-117 ?
81 posted on 11/02/2006 9:39:34 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Yes, and faster, better sensor suite and so on.

I would not bet the -22 is any more expensive than the 117.

I was at Nellis when they did the roll out. Quite the party.


82 posted on 11/02/2006 9:45:33 PM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector; Hillarys Gate Cult
Actually, it was the B-2 stealth bomber that Carter spilled the beans on. It was a rationalization on why he canceled the B-1, since the B-2 was in the pipeline.
83 posted on 11/02/2006 9:50:01 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

F18 compared to the F14: Range - less Payload - less Speed - less.


84 posted on 11/02/2006 9:53:51 PM PST by 185JHP ( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

Bullsh*t! Golden BB got it.


85 posted on 11/02/2006 10:11:40 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

An experienced operator on an high grade radar system could track one, but it wasn't easy. It barely showed up on the screen when they did. Stealth isn't supposed to be invisible, but difficult to track.


86 posted on 11/02/2006 10:29:05 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
I always thought it was hard to tell the difference between the F-117 and B-2. But these pics make it clear.


87 posted on 11/02/2006 10:33:42 PM PST by phantomworker (If you travel far enough, one day you will recognize yourself coming down the road to meet yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Carter brought the Stealth program up during the 1980 campaign. The B-2 didn't start development until 1981. The F-117 was well underway during his Presidency and was first classified as a bomber.


88 posted on 11/02/2006 10:49:15 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

By chance. The AA missile battery commander admitted he just fired his missiles into the flight path that NATO aircraft had been using.


89 posted on 11/02/2006 10:55:35 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Nope. the B 2 was in the planning stages in the 1970's. I remember it well. So do others:

"The development of the B-2 bomber, for example, was a closely-guarded, black world program back in the 1970s until President Carter decided to discuss it in a speech, as proof that he wasn't weak on national defense. In the matter of a few sentences, the B-2 moved from the black world into the white world, with an official budget "line," public relations hand-outs and all the other trappings of an "official" program. "

http://formerspook.blogspot.com/2006/02/mr-libbys-leak.html

"A handful of officials were aware of another factor in the bomber equation, one that would not be publicly known for several years to come. Carter, after his election, had been told of the Air Force’s supersecret Advanced Technology Bomber project, which in time would lead to the operational B-2 stealth aircraft that would be “invisible” to radar. It was an intriguing idea, but Brown always held that the prospect of acquiring the B-2 was not a factor in Carter’s cancellation of the B-1....

...It was at this delicate moment—in late summer of 1980—that word about the previously deep-black stealth aircraft project was leaked to the press. Snippets of information dribbled into print on several different occasions but without overly dramatic effect.

What came next, however, threw gasoline on the fire.

On Aug. 22, 1980, top DOD officials went public with explicit confirmation of the stealth aircraft program. Brown, at a nationally televised Pentagon briefing, maintained, “Stealth technology enables the United States to build manned and unmanned aircraft that cannot be successfully intercepted with existing air defense systems.” He went on to say, “We have demonstrated to our satisfaction that the technology works.”"

http://www.afa.org/magazine/July2006/0706bombers.asp

BTW, the stealth aspects of flying wing designs were known way back in the late 1940's when Northrop developed its original flying wing jet bomber, the YB-49.
90 posted on 11/02/2006 11:03:44 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the ping. It did its job, and well, but it was for sure one of the ugliest aircraft ever built.


91 posted on 11/02/2006 11:56:14 PM PST by zot (GWB -- the most slandered man of this decade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
the crowd went crazy, pointing and yelling, "Stealth! Stealth!"

I don't know, but this just strikes me as really funny...

Mark

92 posted on 11/03/2006 3:58:54 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

I was attempting to have fun because I liked your login name and wholeheartly agree w/ you and I Cor...the history of posts by FreedomProtector is evidence.


93 posted on 11/03/2006 4:12:17 AM PST by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
I heard there was an F22 test result where they could drop bombs on target from outside the range of any SAM known to the military.

Just to yank your chain, the old Bomarc B (retired in 1971) had a range of 400 miles.

94 posted on 11/03/2006 4:18:34 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The F-117 is too much of a niche aircraft.Range is about average,bare minimum warload & no air to air capability.


95 posted on 11/03/2006 5:11:21 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

96 posted on 11/03/2006 5:16:45 AM PST by Toby06 (Happy camper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs
The retirement is not surprising. The only advantage was stealth. Despite its designation it was used as a bomber, not a fighter, and it was strictly subsonic.
97 posted on 11/03/2006 6:26:39 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector

The F-117 has been detectable by low band search radar since day one; a fact well known to those of us in the EW community. The Brits were tracking them from the Persian Gulf during Desert Shield/Storm.


98 posted on 11/04/2006 11:06:03 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Interesting. Thanks for post. Assuming EW = electronic warfare.


99 posted on 11/04/2006 11:13:09 AM PST by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

On paper, the Nighthawk had the ability to carry the AIM-9 Sidewinder. However, for all intents and purposes it was never a fighter.


100 posted on 11/04/2006 11:15:26 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson