Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetjanet998

What it looks like to me is the Times has been exposed as saying it was "bad" that documents got put out on the internet....BUT, those documents show that Saddam was making plans to rebuild the nuclear/wmd stuff, and would have, had we not taken him out....that's my take on it....and I'd say a few others around here. FWIW. By the way, the Times interviewed Jveritas.....but ignored his research.


241 posted on 11/02/2006 10:38:25 PM PST by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins
well the Times will not print anything that looks good for Bush...I am taking the approach that i am ignorant about Jveritas research and just an average joe....to me that article is talking about pre-1991 programs that the Iraqi's gave the info too the UN in the 1990's and in 2002. not about an active program

it doesn;t really matter anyway...anyone that follows this knows saddam wanted WMD and had every intention of restarting his program If/when the UN left(its in the Kay report) he was also in violation of the cease fire acreement becuase he didn't reveal all his duel use stuff(again in the kay report)

But this is too complicated for the avergere Joe to piece together in part becuase of the dimwits spin...if there isn't a pile of nuclear bombs or chemicals weaopns with a sign on them that says "saddams WMD" ....they won't get it

245 posted on 11/02/2006 10:48:07 PM PST by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson