Skip to comments.
Senator Santorum Comments on Release of Valuable Information in Pre-War Documents Discovered in Iraq
Rick Santorum, U.S. Senate ^
| November 3, 2006
Posted on 11/03/2006 9:04:48 AM PST by Ooh-Ah
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Question Liberal Authority
and the point is
ON TOP OF KERRY"S, PELOSI'S, REID'S AND KENNEDY'S HEAD!
To: Ooh-Ah
I call these release a mistake and expect a new one taking the CORRECT approach where he points out that the friggin' story vindicates every single person who voted for, and still supports, the war.
This release is just a defense to the Casey campaign using the NYT intended talking points perspective of the story... not the way I would have handled it.
22
posted on
11/03/2006 9:20:39 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Republican Red
Why is he blasting the President?This information needs to be out there. This country will not get behind the war effort without this information.
To: Grampa Dave
Why is this a good move by Santorum?
He is NOT stating that Iraq was a year away from a nuke. He IS saying the Bush admin are bumbling idiots for putting the info out.
24
posted on
11/03/2006 9:24:49 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(if you don't want to root for the home team then get the hell out of the stadium)
To: Republican Red
"Disappointing."
I think we should be prepared from more disappointment. Even Hoekstra's camp, who was instrumental in getting the documents out there, isn't jumping for joy. "J" has worked tirelessly on this project and is to be given props for it, but IMO, Bush took a beating on this and despite evidence to the contrary, for some dang reason hasn't been and isn't willing to re-visit this issue, and it looks like others will follow suit. Are they all missing the point of the article, probably not, since it would be so easy to state the obvious, as we see it, instead.
25
posted on
11/03/2006 9:27:42 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This reminds me of my Physics Prof....The math problem covered three blackboards. When he got done, he said "darn", erased the 3 boards except for two lines and started over. When he got to the end, he said "there". Yes, we clapped!!
There aren't a lot of scientists who can decipher "nuclear documents". It might look good on paper....but you might have to go back to the blackboard many times.
27
posted on
11/03/2006 9:29:49 AM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: Republican Red
Santorum is desperate and is whoring for Dem votes. He knows he is about to lose. I expect after he is out of the Senate he will be one of those "true" conservatives who wind up bashing our side at every turn.
To: Ooh-Ah
"The International Atomic Energy Agency declined to comment Friday on the report."
"A spokesman for the chief U.S. envoy to the nuclear agency, Gregory L. Schulte, denied that he was approached by agency officials about the posted documents."
"Ambassador Schulte did not receive any protest or expression of concern from the IAEA on this issue," spokesman Matthew Boland told The Associated Press in Vienna, Austria. "No representative of our mission was approached by a representative of the IAEA on this issue."
If this is true then the NY Slimes lied again and created this issue for political reasons but it looks like it may have backfired on them.
29
posted on
11/03/2006 9:33:41 AM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: over3Owithabrain
I may not understand this Santorum press release but I do not think Santorum is the kind of man that, if he loses, will turn up on CNN as the new David Gergan.
Santorum is a decent, loyal guy. .
30
posted on
11/03/2006 9:33:53 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(if you don't want to root for the home team then get the hell out of the stadium)
To: over3Owithabrain
what a crock of crap your comment is.
IF I had to pick 5 republicans to trust to be true conservatives, Santorum is one of them.
That you can be so off base betrays your ignorance.
31
posted on
11/03/2006 9:34:41 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Republican Red; Grampa Dave
He is NOT stating that Iraq was a year away from a nuke. He IS saying the Bush admin are bumbling idiots for putting the info out. He is saying the Bush admin are bumbling idiots for putting the info out -and- that he had already warned them to not do something like this, but they did so anyway due to apparent carelessness.
So, it's an even more damning attack by Santorum.
32
posted on
11/03/2006 9:35:15 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Republican Red
Not Gergen, more like Scarborough
To: Republican Red
I think Santorum is trying to inoculate himself from charges that his legislation caused the release of this information to the Web. Read it carefully before you jump all over him. There is such a thing as good legislation that gets badly implemented.
34
posted on
11/03/2006 9:35:44 AM PST
by
Dems_R_Losers
(VOTE as if your life depends on it -- because it does!!!)
To: Ooh-Ah
Senator Ricky! The polite thing to do when the Talking Heads and Democrat Hacks declare you deceased is to lie quietly in the casket with your hands folded.
35
posted on
11/03/2006 9:36:25 AM PST
by
WideGlide
(That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
To: FreedomNeocon
True conservatives don't lick Specter's boots. Rick's a typical pol, a reliable vote, but once he is out next week all bets are off.
To: over3Owithabrain
Oh, for God's sake, here we go again. Arlen Specter is the debbil!!! Get over it, man.
37
posted on
11/03/2006 9:37:48 AM PST
by
Dems_R_Losers
(VOTE as if your life depends on it -- because it does!!!)
To: Dems_R_Losers
Relax - I'm simply making an observation. Do you think Arlen is a good conservative? That was my point, save the hyperbole.
To: Republican Red
That's one reason he's behind.. If he had a aide reading this site he would be more informed and know how to spin the story..
To: Question Liberal Authority
I'm sorry, did you say:
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program
Saddam Hussein Had A Nuclear Weapons Program?
Just wanted to make sure I heard you correctly - could you please repeat that? Thanks.
40
posted on
11/03/2006 9:42:05 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson