Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Groups at odds with Pentagon over e-mail ballots
Stars and Stripes ^ | November 5 | Geoff Ziezulewicz,

Posted on 11/05/2006 1:59:43 AM PST by PghBaldy

Army Sgt. Joshua Payne might have voted in the 2004 election. But a deployment to Iraq got in the way.

In the end, the 24-year-old 32nd Signal Battalion member said it just wasn’t worth it.

“Between deployments and everything, it’s too hard,” the Darmstadt, Germany-based soldier said. “Mail was so slow out there, it was kind of pointless.”

Anyone who has worn the uniform knows the difficulties of voting overseas.

So the Defense Department’s Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP), which supervises voting for Americans overseas, shopped a program to stateside election authorities this year that would allow jurisdictions and voters to send ballots and voter information via unencrypted e-mail.

Eight states agreed to receive e-mailed ballots from overseas voters, Dr. David Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in September. But concerns over privacy, personal security and vote tampering have critics crying foul over the DOD-sponsored initiative, warning that voting by e-mail is an unsecure process that could lead to identity theft or vote tampering.

Bob Carey, a senior fellow with the National Defense Committee, a private group that advocates for military voting rights, said he is not surprised that most states rejected the plan.

“It stinks,” he said. “If I were a local election official, I wouldn’t want to use it. You’re basically forcing the servicemember to divulge personal information (in an unsecured e-mail), and you’re giving up the private vote.”

But FVAP officials say voting by e-mail this year is a matter of offering an imperfect system or no alternative at all to paper ballots. And with so many troops in places where a paper ballot might not reach them, this is the best route for now, said Scott Wiedmann, FVAP’s deputy director.

Voters who opt to send a completed ballot by e-mail or fax are warned of the potential security and privacy issues, he said. More states now allow faxing completed ballots, which has been in practice since the Persian Gulf War.

“We do have many citizens who are moving around during this time frame or who are too far remote to receive regular mail service,” he said. “We want to make as many options as possible.”

Previous FVAP initiatives to further the vote-by-e-mail option for military voters also have failed, critics contend. In 2004, a similar program was canceled after an oversight committee raised questions about security. Those same security issues have been raised this year, but the program remains.

“After every election, DOD seems to immediately forget that there is another election coming up, and then it runs to create some new system at the last minute, which is untested and doesn’t work as advertised,” U.S. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., said in a statement. Other lawmakers also expressed concern over the program.

The price of security An independent DOD review in August raised concerns about the security of e-mailing votes, among them identity theft and the possibility of vote tampering.

“The threat should not be underestimated,” the report states. “There are serious vulnerabilities in transmitting personal identification information or voting materials over the Internet. … [The] unecrypted transmission of name, Social Security number, date of birth and address should not be encouraged under any circumstances.”

However, 87 percent of servicemembers surveyed in a focus group said they were likely to vote over the Internet if security were adequate, a Government Accountability Office representative told the Senate Armed Services Committee in September.

If the system for sending ballots by e-mail is not yet secure, the DOD shouldn’t be advocating it, said Susan Dzieduszycka-Suinat, executive director of the Overseas Vote Foundation, a nonprofit group that helps overseas voters.

“[Voters] would assume that if any government agency offers this at any level, then it’s safe,” she said. “This is jumping the gun.”

Today’s technology cannot guarantee the security of a vote e-mailed through conventional channels, said Dr. David Wagner, a computer science professor at the University of California-Berkley who recommended scrapping the similar 2004 program over security concerns and who again issued a report this year with other experts criticizing e-mail voting.

“Voting by e-mail is convenient, but it’s also pretty risky,” he said in an e-mail. “There’s nothing that the states or FVAP can do to make unecrypted e-mail secure. The only solution is to avoid unecrypted e-mail for returning voted ballots.”

Wiedmann said that FVAP will continue to look for ways to make the nonpaper ballot a viable option. Furthering the e-mail voting concept will have to wait until the federal Election Assistance Commission releases its standards for Internet voting, which Wiedmann said he doesn’t expect in time to affect the 2008 election process.

“At this point, there’s sadly not much that officials can do about these problems before the November election, except cross their fingers and hope for the best,” Wagner said.

Stars and Stripes reporter Matt Millham contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elections; fvap; uocava; wot
Website for troops & expats to access voting options: http://www.fvap.gov/

Note that another Democrat complained about this: “After every election, DOD seems to immediately forget that there is another election coming up, and then it runs to create some new system at the last minute, which is untested and doesn’t work as advertised,” U.S. Rep. ***Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y***., said in a statement. Other lawmakers also expressed concern over the program.

1 posted on 11/05/2006 1:59:45 AM PST by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
The military consists of people too stupid to vote. Which is why the Democrats are blocking efforts to allow military personnel to cast their votes in this election.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

2 posted on 11/05/2006 2:01:57 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Could you list the States who agreed to receive e-mailed ballots from overseas voters? Tks.


3 posted on 11/05/2006 2:04:47 AM PST by Alex1977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex1977

From this website (FVAP.Gov) Not sure about what others there are. Will look:

http://www.fvap.gov/index.html

North Carolina Expands Electronic Transmission of Voting Materials by Fax to it’s Citizens Outside the U.S.

Colorado Allows Uniformed Services Members Deployed Outside the U.S. to Vote Absentee by Fax and Email

Special Instructions for Voters in the 16th Congressional District of Florida

Mailing Of Absentee Ballots To UOCAVA Citizens In Mississippi

Iowa To Allow Its Citizens Overseas to Vote Absentee by Fax and Email

Wisconsin Changes Ballot Request And Ballot Return Deadlines

Missouri Authorizes the Faxing and Emailing of Returned Ballots for Military Personnel in Certain Areas.


4 posted on 11/05/2006 2:09:22 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Ah - here is map. People can click on it: Electronic Transmission Alternatives by State http://www.fvap.gov/ivas/fvap_state_menu.html


5 posted on 11/05/2006 2:12:57 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

My state, PA, says it must be POSTMARKED by Monday:
http://www.fvap.gov/pubs/vag/vagerrata.html

"As of July 24, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA

Items IIC and IIIC. First paragraph, should now read as follows:

"Ballot Return Deadline: Voted ballot envelope must be postmarked not later than the day before the election and received in the County Board of Elections office by the seventh day following an election." ------- IIRC, military ballots mailed are NOT necessarily postmarked? Does anyone know if this is true?


6 posted on 11/05/2006 2:26:32 AM PST by PghBaldy (This hominid named Kerry annoys me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson