[Petronski]

Over the years I have observed that the Toesucker shows great analysis but reaches the wrong conclusion (kinda like a calculus problem shown correctly, but with a subtraction error that makes the final result wrong).

This is encouraging. Thank you, Toesucker, for showing your work.

[p[adre29]

Over the years I have observed that the Toesucker shows great analysis but reaches the wrong conclusion (kinda like a calculus problem shown correctly, but with a subtraction error that makes the final result wrong).

Exactly, Morris is very good at reading the goat entrails of a poll, and commenting on a polls bias, but his major conclusions are missing depth. He predicted a Kerry win for instance.

I think the reason for that is a lack of understanding how character and voting based on values means and works.

[EveningStar]

Many of the swing voters are going to tilt to the left this time. We know that. We also know that some of us are going to say, "What the hell. We're going to lose. I'm not voting. I'm just going straight to work."

Of course, we can't do that. We have to vote. If we don't stay home, if we do turn out, we can overcome the swing voters.

[SierraWasp]

"Thank you, Toesucker"

This little piggy went to market...
This little piggy stayed home...
This little piggy had roast beef...
This little piggy had none...
This little piggy went wee wee wee, all the way home!!!

[Irene Adler]

"Over the years I have observed that the Toesucker shows great analysis but reaches the wrong conclusion..."

Yes, yes, YES! This is my own observation, exactly! How can he be such an interesting analyst, and have had such a successful career as a campaign pollster and strategist and end up so wrong in his conclusions? This happens again and again with him. Quite the puzzle.

[USS Alaska]

Just shut up and suck.