Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pundits on McLaughlin Group, Beltway Boys & Inside Washington Issue Predictions
Newsbusters.org ^ | November 5, 2006 | Brent Baker

Posted on 11/06/2006 6:32:08 AM PST by meg88

On shows aired Friday and Saturday, the journalists and political pundits on the McLaughlin Group, FNC's Beltway Boys and Inside Washington, a local Washington, DC program, made predictions for what will occur in Tuesday's elections. All presumed that Democrats will win enough seats to takeover the House and most forecast that Democrats will win a majority of the most-contested Senate seats.

Below is a rundown of the specific predictions issued by columnist Pat Buchanan, Newsweek writer Eleanor Clift, Washington Times editorial page Editor Tony Blankley, Democratic political veteran and television producer Lawrence O'Donnell, John McLaughlin, Weekly Standard Executive Editor Fred Barnes, Roll Call Executive Editor Morton Kondracke, columnist Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post editorial writer Colby King, columnist and PBS analyst Mark Shields and NPR reporter Nina Totenberg.

Those who forecast that Democrats will take control of the Senate: Clift, O'Donnell, McLaughlin, Kondracke and Shields. Those who think Republicans will retain their Senate majority, if barely: Buchanan, Barnes, Blankley, Krauthammer, King and Totenberg.

Now, the rundown:

McLaughlin Group:

Maryland Senate:

Pat Buchanan: Cardin Eleanor Clift: Cardin Tony Blankley: abstained Lawrence O'Donnell: Cardin John McLaughlin: Cardin

New Jersey Senate:

Buchanan: Menendez Clift: Menendez Blankley: Menendez O'Donnell: Menendez McLaughlin: Menendez

Ohio Senate:

Buchanan: Brown Clift: Brown Blankley: Brown O'Donnell: Brown McLaughlin: Brown

Pennsylvania Senate:

Buchanan: Casey Clift: Casey Blankley: abstained O'Donnell: Casey McLaughlin: Casey

Rhode Island Senate:

Buchanan: Whitehouse Clift: Whitehouse Blankley: Whitehouse O'Donnell: Whitehouse McLaughlin: Whitehouse

Missouri Senate:

Buchanan: Talent Clift: McCaskill Blankley: abstained O'Donnell: McCaskill McLaughlin: McCaskill

Montana Senate:

Buchanan: Burns Clift: Tester Blankley: Burns O'Donnell: Tester McLaughlin: Tester

Tennessee Senate:

Buchanan: Corker Clift: Corker Blankley: Corker O'Donnell: Corker McLaughlin: Corker

Virginia Senate:

Buchanan: Allen Clift: Webb Blankley: Webb O'Donnell: Webb McLaughlin: Allen

FNC's Beltway Boys:

Virginia Senate:

Fred Barnes: Allen Morton Kondracke: Webb

New Jersey Senate:

Barnes: Menendez Kondracke: Menendez

Tennessee Senate:

Barnes: Corker Kondracke: Corker

Missouri Senate:

Barnes: Talent Kondracke: McCaskill

Montana Senate:

Barnes: Burns Kondracke: Tester

Maryland Senate:

Barnes: Cardin Kondracke: Cardin

Ohio Senate:

Barnes: Brown Kondracke: Brown

Rhode Island Senate:

Barnes: Whitehouse Kondracke: Whitehouse

Pennsylvania Senate:

Barnes: Casey Kondracke: Casey

Connecticut Senate:

Barnes: Lieberman Kondracke: Lieberman

Senate overall:

Barnes: Democrats pick up 4 seats, Republicans hold Senate by one Kondracke: Democrats pick up 6 seats, Democrats takeover by one

House overall:

Barnes: Democrats pick up 22 seats Kondracke: Democrats pick up 30 seats

Inside Washington, a weekly half hour produced by ABC's Washington, DC affiliate, WJLA-TV channel 7 which airs it on Sunday morning after it has aired Saturday night on the affiliate's all-news cable channel, NewsChannel 8, and Friday night on DC's PBS station, WETA-TV channel 26:

Charles Krauthammer:

House: Democrats win 21 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Colby King:

House: Democrats gain “at least” 20 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Nina Totenberg:

House: Democrats pick up 20 to 25 seats Senate: 50-50 or Republicans hold by one

Mark Shields:

House: Democrats will win more than 35 seats Senate: Democrats will win control


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: idiotsinmedia; talkingheads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2006 6:32:09 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meg88

Didnt read it and don't want to


2 posted on 11/06/2006 6:33:51 AM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

I could really care less what the DC bubble crowd thinks. They have been wrong so many time before and tomorrow will be no different.


3 posted on 11/06/2006 6:34:37 AM PST by Dane ("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Nina Totenberg reminds me of Lilly Tomlin's telephone operator character so much I've never been able to take her seriously.


4 posted on 11/06/2006 6:35:15 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Republican, atheist, pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bookmarked for Wednesday


5 posted on 11/06/2006 6:35:27 AM PST by ClarenceThomasfan (It's like a plantation - and you know what I mean!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Is this going to be their last "prediction"?

Because I'm ready to make up my scorecard for Tuesday night.

6 posted on 11/06/2006 6:37:14 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter (Sign at World Series in St. Louis, October 27, 2006 "The Experts are Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

For what it's worth, Kondracke nailed 1994 in his final predictions, when no one else predicted the GOP tsunami.

I hope he's wrong this time.


7 posted on 11/06/2006 6:41:34 AM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Never will forget watching Washington Week in Review the weekend before the 1980 election. Two of the four panelists picked Carter to defeat Reagan. Couldn't believe it at the time.


8 posted on 11/06/2006 6:42:19 AM PST by IndyTiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Columns and rows with headers are your best friends.


9 posted on 11/06/2006 6:45:43 AM PST by Utah Binger (Southern Utah, where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Fox News had Dan Blather on this Saturday talking about Saddam.

Since FNC put a traitor like that on and took him seriously, I no longer trust any of their talking heads to know anything about politics. They only know DNC talking points.

If FNC thinks we should still believe they are fair and balanced, they've got another thing coming.

Now, I no longer have any television news to watch. Guess I'll keep in touch through Free Republic.

10 posted on 11/06/2006 6:51:46 AM PST by Last Laugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

More predictions from the know-nothings that up and down (INCLUDING FOX) had written off '04 even all the way up to and on election night.


11 posted on 11/06/2006 6:54:20 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

"Charles Krauthammer:

House: Democrats win 21 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Colby King:

House: Democrats gain “at least” 20 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one

Nina Totenberg:

House: Democrats pick up 20 to 25 seats Senate: 50-50 or Republicans hold by one"

Hate to say it but I actually agree with these predictions, especially Charles Krauthammer's. GOTV!


12 posted on 11/06/2006 6:54:44 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
I just don't see it happening for the Rats in either the House or Senate. Of all the races that are at least toss-ups held by House Republicans there are only about a dozen then 8-10 lean Rat or heavy Rat which would mean that the Rats would have to sweep every race but history shows the incumbent win over 50% of the time of those that are at least toss-ups. The most I see the Rats gaining in the House is 11 seats and more than likely only about 8 seats.
13 posted on 11/06/2006 6:56:18 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

I think the Dems House gain may be less than 15 after Kerry's comments dominated the news cycle after last week,


14 posted on 11/06/2006 6:58:59 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: meg88

C'mon Meg; we've got momentum and a little hope. Why are you posting this crap; to try and discourage us?


15 posted on 11/06/2006 7:01:25 AM PST by no dems (Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

I thought it was a McLaughlin vs. Beltway Boys debate. That would've been good.


16 posted on 11/06/2006 7:03:51 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

And why does Blankley prostitute himself sitting on a panel with O'Donnell and Clift? To say nothing of McLaughlin....uh. Not one worth the time.


17 posted on 11/06/2006 7:09:58 AM PST by OldFriend (VOTE AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDED UPON IT.......IT DOES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The the pundits are assuming that Dem's have no lossess and that all the seats lost are those of Republicans...

Just remember, if a Dem incumbent loses one seat, the Dems have to win one seat to maintain it and another to gain ground...so I'm having trouble with these wild 20 to 30 seat gains claims!


18 posted on 11/06/2006 7:14:40 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Save the Republic! Mess with the polling firms' heads!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
For what it's worth, Kondracke nailed 1994 in his final predictions, when no one else predicted the GOP tsunami.

Hmmm... he's currently predicting Kondracke: Democrats pick up 6 seats in the Senate, 30 seats in the House

19 posted on 11/06/2006 9:36:20 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

The problem is that few, if any, Dem incumbents are in any danger of losing.


20 posted on 11/06/2006 9:37:30 AM PST by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson