Skip to comments.
Pundits on McLaughlin Group, Beltway Boys & Inside Washington Issue Predictions
Newsbusters.org ^
| November 5, 2006
| Brent Baker
Posted on 11/06/2006 6:32:08 AM PST by meg88
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
11/06/2006 6:32:09 AM PST
by
meg88
To: meg88
Didnt read it and don't want to
2
posted on
11/06/2006 6:33:51 AM PST
by
dforest
(be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
To: meg88
I could really care less what the DC bubble crowd thinks. They have been wrong so many time before and tomorrow will be no different.
3
posted on
11/06/2006 6:34:37 AM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: meg88
Nina Totenberg reminds me of Lilly Tomlin's telephone operator character so much I've never been able to take her seriously.
4
posted on
11/06/2006 6:35:15 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, atheist, pro-life)
To: All
5
posted on
11/06/2006 6:35:27 AM PST
by
ClarenceThomasfan
(It's like a plantation - and you know what I mean!)
To: meg88
Is this going to be their last "prediction"?
Because I'm ready to make up my scorecard for Tuesday night.
6
posted on
11/06/2006 6:37:14 AM PST
by
A Citizen Reporter
(Sign at World Series in St. Louis, October 27, 2006 "The Experts are Idiots")
To: meg88
For what it's worth, Kondracke nailed 1994 in his final predictions, when no one else predicted the GOP tsunami.
I hope he's wrong this time.
To: meg88
Never will forget watching Washington Week in Review the weekend before the 1980 election. Two of the four panelists picked Carter to defeat Reagan. Couldn't believe it at the time.
8
posted on
11/06/2006 6:42:19 AM PST
by
IndyTiger
To: meg88
Columns and rows with headers are your best friends.
9
posted on
11/06/2006 6:45:43 AM PST
by
Utah Binger
(Southern Utah, where the world comes to see America)
To: meg88
Fox News had Dan Blather on this Saturday talking about Saddam.
Since FNC put a traitor like that on and took him seriously, I no longer trust any of their talking heads to know anything about politics. They only know DNC talking points.
If FNC thinks we should still believe they are fair and balanced, they've got another thing coming.
Now, I no longer have any television news to watch. Guess I'll keep in touch through Free Republic.
To: meg88
More predictions from the know-nothings that up and down (INCLUDING FOX) had written off '04 even all the way up to and on election night.
11
posted on
11/06/2006 6:54:20 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: meg88
"Charles Krauthammer:
House: Democrats win 21 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one
Colby King:
House: Democrats gain at least 20 seats Senate: Republicans hold by one
Nina Totenberg:
House: Democrats pick up 20 to 25 seats Senate: 50-50 or Republicans hold by one"
Hate to say it but I actually agree with these predictions, especially Charles Krauthammer's. GOTV!
12
posted on
11/06/2006 6:54:44 AM PST
by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: meg88
I just don't see it happening for the Rats in either the House or Senate. Of all the races that are at least toss-ups held by House Republicans there are only about a dozen then 8-10 lean Rat or heavy Rat which would mean that the Rats would have to sweep every race but history shows the incumbent win over 50% of the time of those that are at least toss-ups. The most I see the Rats gaining in the House is 11 seats and more than likely only about 8 seats.
13
posted on
11/06/2006 6:56:18 AM PST
by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: moose2004
I think the Dems House gain may be less than 15 after Kerry's comments dominated the news cycle after last week,
14
posted on
11/06/2006 6:58:59 AM PST
by
meg88
To: meg88
C'mon Meg; we've got momentum and a little hope. Why are you posting this crap; to try and discourage us?
15
posted on
11/06/2006 7:01:25 AM PST
by
no dems
(Duncan Hunter for Prez / Tony Snow for VEEP in '08)
To: meg88
I thought it was a McLaughlin vs. Beltway Boys debate. That would've been good.
16
posted on
11/06/2006 7:03:51 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: meg88
And why does Blankley prostitute himself sitting on a panel with O'Donnell and Clift? To say nothing of McLaughlin....uh. Not one worth the time.
17
posted on
11/06/2006 7:09:58 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(VOTE AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDED UPON IT.......IT DOES)
To: tobyhill
The the pundits are assuming that Dem's have no lossess and that all the seats lost are those of Republicans...
Just remember, if a Dem incumbent loses one seat, the Dems have to win one seat to maintain it and another to gain ground...so I'm having trouble with these wild 20 to 30 seat gains claims!
18
posted on
11/06/2006 7:14:40 AM PST
by
mdmathis6
(Save the Republic! Mess with the polling firms' heads!)
To: ConservativeDude
For what it's worth, Kondracke nailed 1994 in his final predictions, when no one else predicted the GOP tsunami. Hmmm... he's currently predicting Kondracke: Democrats pick up 6 seats in the Senate, 30 seats in the House
19
posted on
11/06/2006 9:36:20 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: mdmathis6
The problem is that few, if any, Dem incumbents are in any danger of losing.
20
posted on
11/06/2006 9:37:30 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson