Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread - California General Election - 7 November 2006

Posted on 11/07/2006 7:06:48 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture

Welcome to the live thread for the California Primary Election. Polls are open until 8pm tonight. If you are a registered voter, it is your duty to vote and defend your rights and civil liberties, protect your pocketbook, and vote the bums out where applicable.

Feel free to discuss issues key to your local area that others may be interested in. Post your polling place experiences if you like. And post numbers as they come in later tonight.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: angelides; bonds; bowen; brown; bustamante; calelection; calelections; chiang; cigarettetax; corrigan; eminentdomain; feinstein; garamendi; gastax; jessicaslaw; kennard; lockyer; mcclintock; mcpherson; moonbeam; mountjoy; november7; oiltax; parentalnotification; parrish; philtheatyerwheaties; poizner; poochigian; prop1a; prop1a1b1c1d1e; prop1b; prop1c; prop1d; prop1e; prop83; prop84; prop85; prop86; prop87; prop88; prop89; prop90; schwarzenegger; sexoffenders; strickland; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-407 next last

Statewide Initiatives

YES NO Proposition 1A.
Transportation Funding Protection

Should the California Constitution be amended to further protect the state sales tax revenues for transportation purposes from general-purpose use and require any funds borrowed to be repaid to the transportation fund?
YES NO

Proposition 1B.
Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security

Should the state sell $19.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund state and local transportation improvement projects to relieve congestion, improve movement of goods, improve air quality, and enhance safety and security of the transportation system?

YES NO

Proposition 1C.
Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of 2006

Should the state sell $2.9 billion in general obligation bonds to fund housing for lower-income residents and development in urban areas near public transportation?

YES NO

Proposition 1D.
Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities

Should the state sell $10.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund repair and upgrade of public schools, including kindergarten through grade 12, community colleges, and state universities?

YES NO

Proposition 1E.
Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention

Should the state sell $4.1 billion in general obligation bonds to finance disaster preparedness and flood prevention projects at the state and local levels?

YES NO

Proposition 83.
Sex Offenders. Sexually Violent Predators. Punishment, Residence Restrictions and Monitoring

Should California amend existing laws relating to violent and habitual sex offenders and child molesters to increase penalties and monitoring?

YES NO

Proposition 84.
Water Quality, Safety and Supply. Flood Control. Natural Resource Protection. Park Improvements

Should the state issue $5.4 billion in bonds for a wide variety of projects related to water safety, rivers, beaches, levees, watersheds, and parks and forests?

YES NO

Proposition 85.
Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy

Should the California Constitution be amended to require notification of the parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated pregnant minor at least 48 hours before performing an abortion?

YES NO

Proposition 86.
Tax on Cigarettes

Should the state impose an additional tax of $2.60 per cigarette pack to fund new and expanded health services, health insurance for children, and expand tobacco use prevention programs?

YES NO

Proposition 87.
Alternative Energy. Research, Production, Incentives. Tax on California Oil Producers

Should California establish a $4 billion Clean Alternative Energy Program to reduce California's oil and gasoline consumption by 25 percent through incentives for alternative energy, education, and training?

YES NO

Proposition 88.
Education Funding. Real Property Parcel Tax

Should the California Constitution be amended to levy an annual $50 real property tax on most parcels with the funds allocated to five K-12 education programs?

YES NO

Proposition 89.
Political Campaigns. Public Financing. Corporate Tax Increase. Campaign Contribution and Expenditure Limits

Should eligible candidates for state elective offices receive public campaign funding that is supported by new taxes on corporations and financial institutions, and should contribution limits be imposed on those candidates that do not receive public campaign funding?

YES NO

Proposition 90.
Government Acquisition, Regulation of Private Property

Should the California Constitution be amended to require government to pay property owners for substantial economic losses resulting from some new laws and rules, and limit government authority to take ownership of private property?


1 posted on 11/07/2006 7:06:49 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Statewide Races

Governor
Arnold Schwarzenegger
(R-Inc.)

Phil Angelides (D)
  • Edward C. Noonan, American Independent
  • Art Olivier, Libertarian
  • Peter Miguel Camejo, Green
  • Janice Jordan, Peace and Freedom
  • James E. Harris, Independent (Write-in)
  • Vibert Greene, Independent (Write-in)
  • Elisha Shapiro, Independent (Write-in)
  • Donald "Dr Don" Etkes, Independent (Write-in)
  • Robert C. Newman, II, Republican (Write-in)
  • Dealphria Christina Tarver, Independent (Write-in)


Lieutenant Governor
Tom McClintock (R)
John Garamendi (D)
  • Jim King, American Independent
  • Lynnette Shaw, Libertarian
  • Donna J. Warren, Green
  • Stewart A. Alexander, Peace and Freedom


Controller
Tony Strickland (R)
John Chiang (D)
  • Warren Mark Campbell, American Independent
  • Donna Tello, Libertarian
  • Laura Wells, Green
  • Elizabeth Cervantes Barron, Peace and Freedom


Treasurer
Claude Parrish (R)
Bill Lockyer (D)
  • E. Justin Noonan, American Independent
  • Marian Smithson, Libertarian
  • Mehul M. Thakker, Green
  • Gerald Sanders, Peace and Freedom


Attorney General
Chuck Poochigian (R)
Jerry Brown (D)
  • Kenneth A. Weissman, Libertarian
  • Michael S. Wyman, Green
  • Jack Harrison, Peace and Freedom


Secretary of State
Bruce McPherson (R-Inc.)
Debra Bowen (D)
  • Glenn McMillon, Jr., American Independent
  • Margie Akin, Peace and Freedom
  • Gail K. Lightfoot, Libertarian
  • Forrest Hill, Green


Insurance Commissioner
Steve Poizner (R)
Cruz Bustamante (D)
  • Jay Earl Burden, American Independent
  • Dale F. Ogden, Libertarian
  • Larry Cafiero, Green
  • Tom Condit, Peace and Freedom


U.S. Senate
Richard "Dick" Mountjoy (R)
Dianne Feinstein (D-Inc.)
  • Don J. Grundmann, American Independent
  • Michael S. Metti, Libertarian
  • Todd Chretien, Green
  • Marsha Feinland, Peace and Freedom
  • Lea Sherman, Independent (Write-in)
  • Jeffrey Mackler, Independent (Write-in)
  • Kent P. Mesplay, Green (Write-in)
  • Connor Vlakancic, Independent (Write-in)

2 posted on 11/07/2006 7:07:40 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Regional/Key Local Races

(feel free to add your own local races and measures)


3 posted on 11/07/2006 7:09:07 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

JUDICIAL
California State Supreme Court (Yes/No) 
•	Joyce L. Kennard 
•	Carol A. Corrigan 
California State Court of Appeal; District 1; Division 1 (Yes/No) 
•	James J. Marchiano 
•	Sandra Margulies 
California State Court of Appeal; District 1; Division 2 (Yes/No) 
•	James A. Richman 
•	Paul R. Haerle 
California State Court of Appeal; District 1; Division 3 (Yes/No) 
•	Peter Siggins 
•	William R. McGuiness 
California State Court of Appeal; District 1; Division 4 (Yes/No) 
•	Patricia K. Sepulveda 
•	Maria P. Rivera 
•	Ignazio John Ruvolo 
California State Court of Appeal; District 1; Division 5 (Yes/No) 
•	Barbara Jones 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 1 (Yes/No) 
•	Robert M. Mallano 
•	Frances Rothschild 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 2 (Yes/No) 
•	Roger W. Boren 
•	Victoria M. Chavez 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 3 (Yes/No) 
•	Richard D. Aldrich 
•	Patti S. Kitching 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 4 (Yes/No) 
•	Norman L. Epstein 
•	Nora M. Manella 
•	Steven Suzukawa 
•	Thomas L. Willhite 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 5 (Yes/No) 
•	Richard M. Mosk 
•	Sandy R. Kriegler 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 6 (Yes/No) 
•	Arthur Gilbert 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 7 (Yes/No) 
•	Laurie D. Zelon 
•	Fred Woods 
•	Dennis M. Perluss 
California State Court of Appeal; District 2; Division 8 (Yes/No) 
•	Candace D. Cooper 
•	Madeleine Flier 
California State Court of Appeal; District 3 (Yes/No) 
•	Fred K. Morrison 
•	Tani Cantil Sakauye 
•	Cole Blease 
•	Kathleen Butz 
California State Court of Appeal; District 4; Division 1 (Yes/No) 
•	Judith L. Haller 
•	Richard D. Huffman 
•	Cynthia G. Aaron 
•	Joan K. Irion 
•	Judith McConnell 
•	Patricia D. Benke 
California State Court of Appeal; District 4; Division 2 (Yes/No) 
•	Douglas P. Miller 
•	Jeffrey King 
•	Betty A. Richli 
•	Art W. McKinster 
California State Court of Appeal; District 4; Division 3 (Yes/No) 
•	Kathleen E. O'Leary 
•	Raymond J. Ikola 
California State Court of Appeal; District 5 (Yes/No) 
•	Brad R. Hill 
•	Thomas A. Harris 
•	Stephen J. Kane 
•	Rebecca A. Wiseman 
•	Betty L. Dawson 
California State Court of Appeal; District 6 (Yes/No) 
•	Conrad L. Rushing 
•	Nathan D. Mihara 
•	Richard J. McAdams 
•	Wendy Clark Duffy 

4 posted on 11/07/2006 7:09:49 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Thanks CCC! Nice to have a CA thread to keep track of things.

Being in the 50th Dist. I'm not worried about Francine "You don't need papers to vote" Busby taking the seat away from Brian Billbray.

Praying hard today for McClintock!

5 posted on 11/07/2006 7:15:13 AM PST by CAluvdubya (What's so hard to understand about the word illegal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

ping for future.
6 posted on 11/07/2006 7:15:26 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( http://www.freerepublic.com/~jedimasterpikachu/ The tables should be frozen in place, now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; ...
California: Smoking Mad About Prop 86

I stopped to drop off a carton of cigarettes for a disabled veteran at a nursing home. They have a bleak area outside where they can enjoy a cigarette at fixed intervals. He was reading an absentee ballot about Proposition 86.

He said, “This is crazy! We can’t afford $70 for a carton of cigarettes. That’s the most prejudiced, hateful proposition I ever read.”

What I really thought was, the trail of their whole life is littered with their victims. If they could eliminate every smoker on earth, they would just channel another fanatical, inflictive vendetta. It’s their drug of choice. They can’t quit.  

7 posted on 11/07/2006 7:15:30 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Kind of late to be having the primary, isn't it? :)


8 posted on 11/07/2006 7:16:53 AM PST by nhoward14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhoward14

(embarrassed)

I've notified the overworked moderators. :-D


9 posted on 11/07/2006 7:19:00 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
To relive old memories...
Live Thread - California Primary Election - 6 June 2006
10 posted on 11/07/2006 7:20:47 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

BTTT


11 posted on 11/07/2006 7:39:31 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
In Los Angeles county: Proposition H [as in Hell no!]

Would you like a parcel tax added on to your property tax bill? If so, vote yes on Prop H. You'll not only get to pay for your own housing, but you'll get to subsidize the housing of others.

Prop. H Stands For Housing, Tax Hike On Property

To win, the measure must secure two-thirds of the vote, making Proposition H a test of whether affordable housing has become a top priority of local voters.

The largest individual contribution, $200,000, came from Jerry Perenchio, the reclusive Univision founder who is one of the largest political donors in the nation.

snip

12 posted on 11/07/2006 8:03:29 AM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Is that a REAL pic of Bowen?..what a schnozzola...

BTW..Lt. Gov Tom McClintock..it sounds so good saying that..

13 posted on 11/07/2006 8:27:23 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

I enhanced the schnozzola (as well as eyebrows)... though I didn't have to enhance the schnoz too much :-)


14 posted on 11/07/2006 8:32:26 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
This is the unaltered pic of Debra Bowen
15 posted on 11/07/2006 8:36:29 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Mrs. Lurkin and I walked to the local polling place and voted. We were the only voters there at the time.


16 posted on 11/07/2006 9:07:12 AM PST by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

We only get to vote yes or no on the judges. I've lost my notes, but before I voted, I knew which governor had appointed each Judge. I don't expect that any of Gray's appointees will actually lose, but I tried.

As far as I know, the last incumbent judge that lost an election was Jerry Brown's Rose Bird.


17 posted on 11/07/2006 12:54:57 PM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Thanks CCC ....

I voted here in El Dorado County (N. CA foothills) earlier today. Officals report a heavy turnout, LOTS of people arriving while I was there!

El Dorado is a solid RED county; hoping the 'Rats think the 'wave' means they won't have to vote .... :)

Will tune in from time to time...gonna be a loooooong nite. ;)

~GCR~

18 posted on 11/07/2006 1:03:23 PM PST by GoldCountryRedneck (Think of Pelosi as Speaker, then hold your nose if you must, and vote Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
JUDGE INFO:

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/19863.html

Radical Judges On California Ballot

November 02, 2006 04:38 PM EST

California may be in more trouble than New Jersey, however. The most radical group of liberal judicial activists in the history of any one state election is now on the ballot on November 7, 2006. Will Californians go down the same destructive path that New Jersey and Massachusetts have? Only a miracle will stop this madness. Let the miracle begin with an educated analysis of those good and bad judges on the upcoming California ballot.

November 7, 2006: Will The Voters Of California Affirm The Most Radical Group Of Judges In United States History? Here Are The Judicial Choices On The Nov. Ballot:

California Supreme Court: Vote NO!

Joyce L. Kennard - A radical liberal, Republican appointee, Joyce L. Kennard has already stated that she approves of same-sex marriages. Kennard's grievous rulings on behalf of the abortion industry seem to know no boundaries. She voted to throw out the Parental Notification law, thus depriving parents of the right to know if their minor daughters are getting abortions. Vote No!

Carole A. Corrigan - The Gay and Lesbian Times stated that Corrigan is perhaps the first lesbian appointed to California's Supreme Court when liberal Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger appointed her to the state's highest court in January of 2006. Both Corrigan and Kennard voted with the majority on the Calif. Supreme Court in a recent 7-0 vote to uphold a Berkeley, Calif. city ordinance that ordered the Sea Scouts to accept homosexuality around their little boys or vacate their charity status in the city. Vote No!

Associate Justice Court of Appeals - Fourth Appellate District

Divison One - Presiding Justice Judith McConnell

Vote NO:

Judith McConnell - McConnell is perhaps, the single most radical justice in California. Originally appointed by leftist Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, McConnell was recommended to the Fed. Court of Appeals by Pres. Bill Clinton and nominated by Sen. Barbara Boxer. In 2001, Gray Davis nominated her to the Court of Appeals. McConnell is simply a radical, pro-homosexual judicial activist who made one of the most notorious anti-family rulings in U.S. history. In the case of Betty Lou Batey, a born-again Christian mother who divorced her husband for being involved in homosexuality: McConnell granted child custody to the homosexual partner of Batey's husband after he died of AIDS. When Batey's husband died, Judge McConnell granted custody of their daughter to the deceased husband's living gay lover instead of Mrs. Batey because Mrs. Batey told the court that she felt homosexuality was a sin

(http://www.flashreport.org/blog0a.php?postID=2006101314115045&authID=2005091915442370). Voters must Vote NO on returning McConnell back to the Court of Appeals.

Division One - Seat One - Patricia D. Benke

Vote NO:

Patricia D. Benke - Another radical, pro-abortion liberal appointed to the Appellate Court by former Republican Gov. Deukmejian. Benke ruled against pro-lifers in one of the most notorious San Diego abortion cases in U.S. history

(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36787). Benke ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood attorney James McElroy to force USJF pro-life attorneys to pay nearly $100,000 in bogus fees when the pro-life attorneys filed a lawsuit to protect young girls who were getting abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics

(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37440). Benke must be rejected by voters on November 7, 2005. Vote NO!

Division One - Seat 2 - Richard D. Huffman

VOTE YES!

Richard D. Huffman - Justice Huffman, appointed by former Gov. Deukmejian, has made a recent ruling that was very favorable for pro-life and traditional family values. In the recent case of Benitez v. North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. et al., Justice Huffman, in a 3-0 ruling, ruled that doctors at the clinic did not have to impregnate a lesbian under their treatment

(http://www.casp.net/benitez.html). In supporting the religious views of the doctors, Huffman and the appellate court supported the physicians' right to deny impregnating unmarried couples because it violated their Biblical beliefs. Justice Huffman's support for Christian values in this case is a clear reason to reelect him to the court on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote YES!

Division One - Seat 3 - Judith Haller

Vote NO:

Judith Haller - One of the most radical and liberal supporters of abortion in the California judiciary. Appointed by former liberal Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, Haller ruled against pro-lifers in one of the most notorious San Diego abortion cases in U.S. history (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36787). Haller ruled in favor of Planned Parenthood attorney James McElroy to force USJF pro-life attorneys to pay nearly $100,000 in bogus fees when the pro-life attorneys filed a lawsuit to protect young girls who were getting abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37440). All voters must reject Haller's reelection to the appellate court. Vote NO!

Division Three - Seat 4 - Cynthia G. Aaron

Vote NO:

Cynthia G. Aaron - Another radical appointment by former Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, Cynthia G. Aaron was recently honored by the radical liberal group, the American Jewish Committee, whose board of trustees include radicals Bob Filner, Lynn Shenk and gay pride participant Sheriff Bill Kolender, as well as lesbian boardmember Bonnie Dumanis. This group lists as speakers for its leadership program, leftist Congresswoman Susan Davis, embryonic stem cell advocate Joe Panetta of BIOCOM, and radical San Diego City Councilman Scott Peters (http://www.ajcsandiego.org). The American Jewish Committee has been fighting aggressively for the removal of the Ten Commandments from public squares and is a major proponent of the illgotten "separation of church and state" ideology (http://www.ajc.org/site/c.ijITI2PHKoG/b.836823/k.76DA/ChurchState_Relations.htm). Aaron has already made a major ruling in a lesbian libel case and will continue to be a dangerous judge making rulings hostile to traditional family values. All voters must reject Cynthia G. Aaron. Vote NO!

Division One - Seat 5 - Joan K. Irion

Vote NO:

Joan K. Irion - Appointed by Democratic former Gov. Gray Davis, Irion is sure to continue the radical rulings for abortion and gay rights that other Davis appointees have been handing down. Voters should reject Irion on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote NO!

Divsion Two - Seat 1 - Art W. McKinster

Vote NO:

Art W. McKinster- Appointed by former Gov. Deukmejian, on surface McKinster is not that radical, until a deeper review of his rulings is demonstrated. McKinster's ruling to uphold a $1.4 million jury verdict on behalf of a strip club in 1993 demonstrates that this justice is not interested in protecting society from the adult entertainment industry. The case involving The Flesh Club in San Bernardino, was notorious for the court intervening in the right of a local government to restrict businesses it deems a public nuisance. McKinster, in siding with the strip club, ruled that laws restricting adult entertainment, are unconstitutional (http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/FSCView.asp?coid=865). This perverted-minded judge should be voted down on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote NO!

Division Two - Seat 2 - Betty A. Richli

Vote YES:

Betty A. Richli - Appointed by Gov. Pete Wilson, Justice Richli has mostly been conservative in her rulings. Recent rulings to protect student's and parent's privacy by declaring a state law unconstitutional which had allowed the names of minor students to be publicly disclosed when the student is expelled from school was a fair ruling to protect parental/child rights. Richli has also ruled in favor of the strength of marijuana drug laws. She has ruled that police officers cannot sue for defamation of character when they are falsely accused, a ruling not too favorable with law enforcement. Overall Justice Richli should be returned to the bench on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote YES!

Division Two - Seat 3 - Jeffrey King

Vote NO:

Jeffrey King - Appointed by liberal Gov. Gray Davis, King gave $450 to radical, abortion-extremist Democrat Congressman Joe Baca in 2002 for his congressional campaign (http://herndon2.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00325449/68240/sa/11A1). King should be soundly rejected for reelection on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote NO!

Division Two - Seat 4 - Douglas P. Miller

Vote NO:

Douglas P. Miller - As a recent appointment to the Appellate Court by Gov. Schwarzenegger, there is no confidence in any Schwarzenegger appointment with regards to abortion or homosexual issues. Schwarzenegger has not appointed anyone who supports a pro-life or pro-traditional marriage inclination. Additionally, Miller spent a great deal of his educational and teaching history with BYU, thus his prejudicial tempremant towards Mormonism could be a problem for those who are strict Christian traditionalists. Vote No on Miller on Nov. 7, 2006. Vote NO!

Division Three - Seat 1 - Kathleen O'Leary

Vote NO:

Kathleen O'Leary - Appointed by former California Democratic Governor Gray Davis, there is no doubt that O'Leary will rule in favor of the radical abortion and gay lobbies whenever those issues come before her court. O'Leary should be soundly rejected by voters. Vote NO!

Division Three - Seat 2 - Raymond J. Ikola

Vote NO:

Raymond J. Ikola - As an apointee to the Appellate Court by Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, Ikola has made controversial rulings on illegal immigrants and video camera survelliance issues vs. free speech. Ikola has the potential to make very dangerous rulings and should be rejected by voters. Vote NO!

By James Hartline, publisher of the James Hartline Report.

19 posted on 11/07/2006 1:09:23 PM PST by Doomonyou (Moderate Bumper Sticker: Bush Lied, Terrorists Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

Thanks for the list.


20 posted on 11/07/2006 1:11:38 PM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-407 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson