On second thought I did have a swingin' time on the High Line with a young babe many moons ago so maybe it is just that!
I like the fact that you make no sense to me... :)
Well if these remaining 70K of votes go better, maybe some good news.
Sorry but we lost.
At least, we won in Tennessee.
Now we have 49 Senators plus Ben Nelson would continue the war in Iraq, from what I assume.
Especially since Chafee is out of the way.
Looks pretty good, but I think you're a bit too optimistic about Yellowstone.
Anything is possible considering that WA Gov race a while back.
In the Flathead we went 58% for Burns and 38% for Tester. We did our part.
Burns finished at 51.28% in 2000 (about 7.7% lower than Bush in 2000). That translated into 2700 more votes than the Dem.
http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/elections/results/ares1100/
Bush did get about 2.7% more of the vote in 2004 (61.7%) than in 2000 (59%). And the voters totaled 8k higher in 2004 than in 2000.
http://www.co.yellowstone.mt.gov/elections/results/ARES1104/default.htm
So the +7,100 estimate you have for 2006 may be high, but even if it is cut in half and the other counties break close to what you have Burns should still come out on top...in a squeaker.
Looks like some of Yellowstone's been counted per cnn, but not the MN sos. Where are you getting the counted data for Meagher county?
Links for Secretary or State site please.
Do you know when Yellowstone is expected to be in?
Hell... with that title...I thought this was a suggestion that we should all move there. ;^)
Burns is a loser. He is practically Abramhoff's butt boy. And his opponent was a conservative white male. Its not like he was running against Cindy Sheehan.