Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spot-on report describes 3-missile attack (on TWA 800)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 9 November 2006 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 11/09/2006 9:04:16 AM PST by Hal1950

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-286 next last
To: dinoparty
Imagine, for instance, the number of people who would have to be in on it. First you've got the FBI investigators, then you've got anyone from the CIA who uncovered any evidence of said plot at a later date. Then you've got everyone in the NTSB investigation. Then, if it was a failed U.S. missile test as some fruit loops here maintain (or an intentional military shootdown, as some even fruitier fruit loops maintain) you've got people on the vehicle that fired the missile (which would almost certainly have to be a ship) and everyone in a position to know the vehicle came back missing a missile. For example, USS normandy was in the area, but she came back to port with full magazines.

We're looking at hundreds, maybe thousands of people, and none of them are speaking up. Simply not possible.

81 posted on 11/09/2006 10:41:34 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Thanks for accusing the Prez of covering up a terroist attack, moonbat.


82 posted on 11/09/2006 10:42:22 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Here's a little ditty to add to the conspiracy/coverup theory. FWIW, I was chatting with someone recently who said that the HAARP project had something to do with TWA 800. Supposedly, someone who worked at HAARP at the time said that they had really screwed up. What that means, I don't know.


83 posted on 11/09/2006 10:43:59 AM PST by Chena ("LET'S ROLL!!!!!!!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

"I don't believe that anyone in the military would shot down a passenger airline (excepted one controlled by terrorist). And if they believed that is what they were doing, they would not keep it a secret."

I happened to be an observer a few years ago when two Navy missiles were fired from Wallops Island for the purpose of hitting a drone off the east coast of the U.S. Perhaps flight 800 was in the wrong place at the right time. That would explain the presence of other military assets in the area that night.

If there were a missile test for the purpose of testing SDI technology for example, you can be assured that it would be classified so highly no one would talk about it.

I'm not saying I believe that's what happened (I tend to believe it was a terrorist hit), but that is a plausible explanation as to how the military could have been involved.


84 posted on 11/09/2006 10:44:53 AM PST by rwt60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

The internet is truly amazing. I decided to search for any information that included TWA 800 and HAARP. What I found is basically what this person was saying.

Here's the link: http://www.dudeman.net/siriusly/0/sup/twa800.shtml

IF HAARP had anything to do with it, it wouldn't be so surprising that it would have been covered up due to classified information.


85 posted on 11/09/2006 10:49:56 AM PST by Chena ("LET'S ROLL!!!!!!!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight
Are any of you willing to give me an estimate of how many people would have to know about this and keep quiet? People in the investigation and in the government?

It would have to be at least hundreds. The Toon and friends couldn't even keep word about his fickle pickle from leaking out, or keep the lid on the stuff Gary Aldrich put in Unlimited Access, but they can shut up hundreds of people, many of whom had no love for the Toon, I'm sure?

Get a grip on this: Conspiracy theories such as this require the silence of hundreds of people who have zero incentive to be silent. It's crap. The center tank exploded (similar thing happened to a KC-135 while I was working them) and when the nose came off the burning rear half looked like a missile trail. End of story.

86 posted on 11/09/2006 10:53:12 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I'm not sure what you mean by conspiracy theories--the possible missile strike or the alleged cover-up, but virtually every terrorist strike that occurs is a conspiracy. The 9/11 incident was a conspiracy. The first WTC bombing was a conspiracy. The government typically charges terrorists with conspiracy along with other things when they're caught. Terrorist strikes by nature must be carried out through the coordinated action of numerous individuals--a conspiracy by definition.

Now, it is much harder to envision our own government officials being involved in a conspiracy, but it isn't impossible. Implausible but not impossible. That may be what you're saying.


87 posted on 11/09/2006 10:53:38 AM PST by rwt60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rwt60
Now, it is much harder to envision our own government officials being involved in a conspiracy, but it isn't impossible. Implausible but not impossible. That may be what you're saying.

You said it much better. I danced around it. It's interesting [if true] how this so closely mirrors the kind of conspiracy theory I ref'd to, the most common one being that GWB engineered the WTC attacks to incite a 'war for oil.'

But I'm sure that malarky is NOT welcome here.
88 posted on 11/09/2006 10:57:21 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Thanks for accusing the Prez of covering up a terroist attack, moonbat.

Actually, it was the Clinton administration which covered it up. The Bush administration's motive in letting things lie is preserving the integrity of the presidency. That's what the New Tone is all about.

89 posted on 11/09/2006 10:59:52 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Why not, especially if it brings out the truth?

I am fed up with people who keep avoiding the truth.


90 posted on 11/09/2006 11:01:23 AM PST by B4Ranch (Illegal immigration Control and US Border Security - The jobs George W. Bush refuses to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
That would put the launch site on or near Fire Island. There would certainly be some witnesses to the missle launches on a July evening.

Exactly. Sure, there are eywitnesses who say they saw missile trails, but no one who saw a launch. The fact that the rear half of the plane shot up and left a fire trail explains the "missile trail" sightings. The lack of a missile launch sighting cannot be explained.

91 posted on 11/09/2006 11:02:48 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Some people actually think Bush engineered the attack on the WTC and this war. I'm assuming you weren't talking about that.

Think about it: why is it farfetched to think the media would 'hide' any complicity of Bill Clinton's involvement in the TWA flight going down? The MSM protect Dems all the time, so as infuriating as it would be, it doesn't surprise.


92 posted on 11/09/2006 11:05:03 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

Doesnt Iran have anti-aircraft missiles on its navy ships and submarines?


93 posted on 11/09/2006 11:07:04 AM PST by XBob (Jail the employers of the INVADERS !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwt60

I don’t believe the military fired the missile. I don’t think that could be covered up.

I doubt that American enlisted servicemen would keep a secret like shooting down an American commercial airline. Some of them would talk long before now.


94 posted on 11/09/2006 11:08:12 AM PST by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: rootntootn

A few years back under clinton, we had extensive discussions of this here on FR. Alamo Girl made a whole fantastic compilation, which she put on the web (link on FR main page - or at least there was), and I do remember that there was some famous person on board, who had just escaped from another crash/attack. In fact there were several other 'people of special interest' too.


95 posted on 11/09/2006 11:16:04 AM PST by XBob (Jail the employers of the INVADERS !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

34 - "Some will say I am crazy, but I am almost positive someone showed on a news channel the radar data that showed TWA 800 and something intersecting with it, then both disappeared on one of the news shows shortly after it happened?"

===
Relax, you are not crazy. I saw it too, found it on the net, and had a copy (until my hard drive crashed), and as you said, it 'disappeared' from the web, and I could never find it again, anywhere, and I really searched. But I still have a picture in my mind of that scope, the two tracks intersecting and then both disappearing.


96 posted on 11/09/2006 11:25:53 AM PST by XBob (Jail the employers of the INVADERS !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: reagandemo
Just curious. When the IslamoNazi's do a terrorist act they always brag about it. Why have they not done so in this case? I mean I can't remember hearing any claims from them.

Claims were made at the time. I can't remember who it was right off the top of my head, but I recall seeing information about this several times. IIRC, the FBI initially mentioned a couple of groups claiming responsibility, then... nothing...

From what I've read of this incident, it was a missile.

The Bush administration covered up all the clinton's crimes.

97 posted on 11/09/2006 11:30:59 AM PST by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place. (http://www.zprc.org/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Parmenio

I'm a skeptic, too. But I don't think there's anything wrong with simply challenging the version of events presented by the government. Certainly, there are difficult questions about that version. If the investigators already had hatched a theory to include a specific culprit without solid evidence I would join you in equating them with the left. The left's wild conspiracy theories always start with the premise that "the government" or Bush or the CIA did it. Here, people like Lahr are saying, let's figure out what happened before assigning responsibility. I don't think they're the same.


98 posted on 11/09/2006 11:34:04 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

BTTT. I love this freaky crap!


99 posted on 11/09/2006 11:36:31 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I remember that, too, but I've never seen it reliably verified.


100 posted on 11/09/2006 11:37:07 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson