Posted on 11/09/2006 1:12:21 PM PST by peggybac
Rep. Nancy Pelosi plans to sideline colleagues who are hawkish on national security in the Democratic leadership in the House.
Democratic Party sources said as House Speaker, Ms. Pelosi plans to block moves that would place hawks into important chairmanships. The sources said a key casualty would be Rep. Jane Harman, a six-term member of Congress who has cooperated with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee.
"Nancy Pelosi wants total party discipline," a source in the Democratic Party leadership said. "If you played ball with the Republicans during this session, then you're not going to be given an important chair in the next session."
As the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Ms. Harman was expected to become chairman of the powerful committee. But Ms. Pelosi is expected to pass over Ms. Harman for either Rep. Alcee Hastings of Florida or Rep. Silvestre Reyes of Texas, the second-and third-ranking Democrats on the intelligence panel.
The 42-member Congressional Black Caucus has been pushing for Mr. Hastings, an impeached federal judge, to become chairman. Earlier this year, the caucus was upset by Ms. Pelosi's decision to expel Rep. William Jefferson from the committee after he was accused of accepting bribes.
"There is no seniority on the Intelligence Committee," Ms. Pelosi said. "The leader or the speaker can appoint a whole new set of people."
The sources said the 61-year-old Ms. Harman, regarded as the best informed House Democrat on intelligence and technology issues, angered the liberal Ms. Pelosi by supporting the Bush administration’s policies on defense issues, particularly the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act. They said Ms. Pelosi has rebuffed lobbyists in the pro-Israel community and defense industry that sought a chairmanship for Ms. Harman.
"If Nancy Pelosi's apparent determination to deny Jane Harman the chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee to appease the Black Caucus is any indication, Democratic control is not going to be good news for those who believe in competent oversight of the national-security apparatus," said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute.
Ms. Harman, who helped the Democrats draft a national security agenda for the campaign, said she hoped to remain a leading voice on defense issues. She said her California constituents want her to be on the House Intelligence Committee.
"House Intelligence Committee activities are directly relevant to the major concerns of my constituents," Ms. Harman said.
Hardly. This next session of Congress will be bloody and dysfunctional.
Good for us in 2008.
Jane Harmon is a HAWK??? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH!! That's the BEST the left can come up with? DIsgusting!
Agreed. It would be worse for us if they exhibit common sense. Let them coronate the loonies.
Go here:
http://bernie.house.gov/website/leavesite.asp?url=http://cpc.lee.house.gov/
to see who will be running the House of Reps.
It's strange that the actual site is down, but you can go to Bernie Sanders, Socialist from VT, site to see a mirror site of it. Maybe he didn't get the word?
Yeah - the dems publicly F their own who reach across the isle and the republicans celebrate our traitors like McCain.
When are the republicans going to grow some balls and eliminate the RINOs - they are dragging the party down.
On another note: Hastings to chair Intelligence? If that convicted felon, impeached judge were not a member of Congress, he would not be able to even read a federal document classified higher than FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY. Giving him full access to the nations secrets? As a convicted felon, he would not be able to obtain a security clearance for even lowly CONFIDENTIAL documents, much less SECRET, TOP SECRET, CRYPTO TOP SECRET, ETC. Pelosi, of all people, should know this, as a former chairman of Intelligence.
Everything is going according to plan!
2008 will be ours.
Ha! Ha!
FMCDH(BITS)
It's that hard to take power from an incumbent, esp. a DEM incumbent, because they are so sleazy and they will stop at nothing to keep power. True, the Republicans squandered an incredible amount of good will and advantages, but beating people like Dorgan and Durbin is going to be VERY difficult in 2008. And no senate, no judges.
It's all Pelosi's fault!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.