If we get our A game up and recruit even better than we did in 2002 and 2004, then we could do well in the Senate.
We could be competitive in seats in Ark, LA, South Dakota, Montana, and even Michigan and West Virginia.
Think about it, at this point in 2004 if you would have told me that the Dems would have won in PA, Montana, Virginia, Ohio, etc...
I would have laughed!
The dems realize that they had to act like no seat was out of bounds, so do we!
"The dems realize that they had to act like no seat was out of bounds, so do we!"
The Democrats contest *every* seat, and dont give up, and dont mind the long shot races.
When we discussed the Senate races in a thread, someone declared that the seat was not winnable. Hogwash. Montana this year proves that every race is winnable; and that wasnt even a good candidate. (Dems dont seem to mind voting for 2nd rate dunderheads.)
Your choice of targets is about right... we should be able to take MT, ND, LA, and possibly Ark and WV with good candidates. Also MI is a good possibility.