Skip to comments.
Al-Qaeda 'planning for nuclear attack'
The Scotsman ^
| November 14, 2006
| Staff
Posted on 11/13/2006 11:51:01 PM PST by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
1
posted on
11/13/2006 11:51:04 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...
2
posted on
11/13/2006 11:51:18 PM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: MadIvan
OK, Nancy, you've told us W has been doing it wrong for five years--where's YOUR plan to fight Al Qaeda?
3
posted on
11/13/2006 11:52:27 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, atheist, pro-lifer, stranded in Blue Boston)
To: Darkwolf377
OK, Nancy, you've told us W has been doing it wrong for five years--where's YOUR plan to fight Al Qaeda? There's nothing to worry about. Reports like this are just the neocons using their "scare tactics"!
To: Darkwolf377
she doesn't answer to "nancy" any more...you have to call her madame speaker to get a response
5
posted on
11/13/2006 11:58:38 PM PST
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: Darkwolf377
One thing we have been doing is setting up radiation monitors at ports. etc.
I was at a place where they were testing them (big things that container trucks drive under. The guy had a paper cup of liquid, would get in his car and drive through, get out and tweak some dials - drive through again, etc. It was amazing that this stuff that he was carrying (bare hands, street clothes, etc.) was enough to set off the sensors.
6
posted on
11/14/2006 12:00:37 AM PST
by
geopyg
(If the carrot doesn't work, use the stick. Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
To: Darkwolf377
Surrender! The Democritters have been telling us all along that this is their plan. Amazing that now the election is over, the MSM is reporting the truth about what Freeper's have known all along. The Muslims want to kill us.
7
posted on
11/14/2006 12:00:56 AM PST
by
DISCO
To: Darkwolf377
OK, Nancy, you've told us W has been doing it wrong for five years--where's YOUR plan to fight Al Qaeda? The Dr. Doolittle approach?
You know, "Talk to the animals...."
8
posted on
11/14/2006 12:02:47 AM PST
by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
To: DISCO
Yea and the ecomony is so good there aren't enough skilled workers for all the jobs available as reported tonight on the radio !
To: MadIvan
"Rise early and slay them first."
10
posted on
11/14/2006 12:03:14 AM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: geopyg
That's fascinating, thanks for sharing that. I have no idea how this kind of technology works or how sensitive it is so any hard info is interesting.
I wonder if Nancy thinks this is overkill, since Al Qaeda isn't really that big a deal.
11
posted on
11/14/2006 12:05:08 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Republican, atheist, pro-lifer, stranded in Blue Boston)
To: MadIvan
Some unidentified person says Al Quaeda wants to bomb us. Now that's what I call News.
To: Cementjungle
Re #4
This could be all settled if she and other liberal women join the harem of Bin Laden(or whoever is in charge now.) Nuke for liberal harem, sounds like a bargain to me.
To: MadIvan
NANCY! FORGET ABOUT BUSH! ....SAVE US!!!
14
posted on
11/14/2006 12:12:04 AM PST
by
Dallas59
(Muslims Are Only Guests In Western Countries)
To: Dallas59
The American people have long ago put 9/11 behind them. It will take another "big" event to get their attention again. Sadly, if these Muslim terrorists are indeed able to pull off a nuclear explosion of some sort or a chemical attack, say a large qty of saran gas introduced in a sky scraper air-handler system, 9/11 will appear insignificant.
To: MadIvan
Well,
they aint getting any WMDs from Iraq anytime soon thats for sure!
To: snoringbear
9/11 will appear insignificant.What concerns me is that even after a >9/11 attack, who would we attack? Is there a possiblity that our hands would be tied because we couldn't pinpoint a responsible nation? Al Queada is in many countries - if a cell in London pulls it off, are we going to bomb London? Personally, I'd like to get rid of all of these creeps, but I am afraid we would take that attack and hold more memorial services, especially if Dims are in charge.
17
posted on
11/14/2006 12:33:15 AM PST
by
radiohead
(Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking, guts you coward.)
To: kingattax
you have to call her madame speaker to get a response You mean "Shrieker of the House"?
18
posted on
11/14/2006 12:40:31 AM PST
by
blondee123
(Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
To: MadIvan
that future terror attacks in Britain could involve weapons of mass destruction. Interesting, cause "BLAIR SAYS IRAN AND SYRIA CAN BE 'PARTNERS FOR PEACE'..."
19
posted on
11/14/2006 12:44:15 AM PST
by
blondee123
(Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
To: Darkwolf377
Her plan is clear; Withdraw the troops, leave Iraq, Iran, N.Korea, and terror alone, and die happily thereafter. But not before some daily fundraisers to boost Hillary Presidential campaign first.
20
posted on
11/14/2006 1:06:17 AM PST
by
Screamname
(Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson